Ch. 7: The Shadow Brain ("Good Thinking" - by Guy P. Harrison)
Please use this thread to discuss the above chapter.
-
In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 871 on Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:00 am
Ch. 7: The Shadow Brain ("Good Thinking" - by Guy P. Harrison)
- Chris OConnor
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 17033
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 2:43 pm
- 22
- Location: Florida
- Has thanked: 3520 times
- Been thanked: 1313 times
- Gender:
- Contact:
-
-
- One with Books
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:30 am
- 13
- Has thanked: 2280 times
- Been thanked: 727 times
Re: Ch. 7: The Shadow Brain ("Good Thinking" - by Guy P. Harrison)
i hope to read chapter 7 once i've recovered from my piano addiction
- geo
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
- 15
- Location: NC
- Has thanked: 2200 times
- Been thanked: 2201 times
Re: Ch. 7: The Shadow Brain ("Good Thinking" - by Guy P. Harrison)
I just finished Ch. 7. This chapter is about our tendency (Harrison says compulsion) to find meaningful patterns in the background noise, which sometimes contributes to cognitive errors. He uses an excellent example of coin-tossing. If you flip a coin and get heads five times in a row, you may expect that you're due to get tails on the sixth toss. But every toss is fifty-fifty, no matter what came before. There's a reason why you can't beat the house.
Michael Shermer, science historian and founding publisher of Skeptic magazine, calls it “patternicity,” which he defines as follows: The tendency to find meaningful patterns in both meaningful and meaningless data. 19 My minor quibble with that is that the word tendency makes this seem way too passive and infrequent. After many years of listening to people on six continents tell me about their miracles, visions, magical healings, and paranormal encounters, I would describe pareidolia as nothing less than a full-blown universal compulsion. It's as natural as breathing, I suspect.
-Geo
Question everything
Question everything
-
-
- One with Books
- Posts: 2752
- Joined: Thu Dec 30, 2010 4:30 am
- 13
- Has thanked: 2280 times
- Been thanked: 727 times
Re: Ch. 7: The Shadow Brain ("Good Thinking" - by Guy P. Harrison)
a great quote geo and a fantastic point.
so often these seemingly simple points when meditated upon show incredible and far reaching implications.
so often these seemingly simple points when meditated upon show incredible and far reaching implications.
- Harry Marks
-
Bookasaurus
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
- 13
- Location: Denver, CO
- Has thanked: 2341 times
- Been thanked: 1022 times
Re: Ch. 7: The Shadow Brain ("Good Thinking" - by Guy P. Harrison)
I just finished admonishing Interbane for imposing the "pattern" of knowledge assessment on the process of religion. I think what Interbane sees is an inaccurate picture of the matter, created more by his "compulsion" to examine facticity issues in detail and to ignore social process issues than by the actual reality of religion.geo wrote:This chapter is about our tendency (Harrison says compulsion) to find meaningful patterns in the background noise, which sometimes contributes to cognitive errors.
"Michael Shermer, science historian and founding publisher of Skeptic magazine, calls it “patternicity,” which he defines as follows: The tendency to find meaningful patterns in both meaningful and meaningless data."
I would describe pareidolia as nothing less than a full-blown universal compulsion. It's as natural as breathing, I suspect.
So yeah, I think pareidolia is pervasive, Harrison himself is subject to it, as he himself insists, and the best we can do is be on the lookout for confirmation bias induced by it.
Let a hundred flowers bloom, I say. You see one thing, I see another, and by discussing the matter, we assist the truth in emerging.
- DWill
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 6966
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
- 16
- Location: Luray, Virginia
- Has thanked: 2262 times
- Been thanked: 2470 times
Re: Ch. 7: The Shadow Brain ("Good Thinking" - by Guy P. Harrison)
Obviously our species would have been doomed without the endowment of being able to detect patterns in events and phenomena, so patterns are bound to crop up all over the place, even when we're creating dots that aren't really there to connect. It could be another instance of evolution favoring profligacy as the safest route to take.
- geo
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
- 15
- Location: NC
- Has thanked: 2200 times
- Been thanked: 2201 times
Re: Ch. 7: The Shadow Brain ("Good Thinking" - by Guy P. Harrison)
Beautifully said.Harry Marks wrote: Let a hundred flowers bloom, I say. You see one thing, I see another, and by discussing the matter, we assist the truth in emerging.
I'm reminded of the two Gorgon sisters who shared one eye and one tooth. We need each other's viewpoints because every one of us is afflicted with the Dunning–Kruger effect to some degree.
-Geo
Question everything
Question everything
- Harry Marks
-
Bookasaurus
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
- 13
- Location: Denver, CO
- Has thanked: 2341 times
- Been thanked: 1022 times
Re: Ch. 7: The Shadow Brain ("Good Thinking" - by Guy P. Harrison)
Now that I have finished the chapter, I have some doubts about this presentation. Sure, seeing things that are not there is mostly pareidolia, but that is supposed to be created by the shadow brain, the "Fast Thinking" in "Thinking, Fast and Slow." But then Shermer and Harrison sneak it into use in declaring that less instantaneous perception of patterns (such as, "I was desperate, I prayed, and God opened up a parking spot") are the same phenomenon as seeing a tiger in the shadows of the forest when none is there.DWill wrote:Obviously our species would have been doomed without the endowment of being able to detect patterns in events and phenomena, so patterns are bound to crop up all over the place, even when we're creating dots that aren't really there to connect. It could be another instance of evolution favoring profligacy as the safest route to take.
Some work remains to be done. Specifically, there must be some requirements which distinguish the kinds of patterns which we continue to see because we perceived them once, as opposed to the ones we see fleetingly because we have a hair-trigger need to recognize a threat.
The difference is surely going to involve both the difficulty of "looking more closely" as we would for a tiger, and some process which makes us **want** to continue seeing Jesus in the grilled cheese sandwich, or whatever it is.
- geo
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
- 15
- Location: NC
- Has thanked: 2200 times
- Been thanked: 2201 times
Re: Ch. 7: The Shadow Brain ("Good Thinking" - by Guy P. Harrison)
In his Buddhism and Modern Psychology class, Robert Wright talks about a study by Jesse Prinz and Angelika Seidel that shows how the shadow brain is wired to look for danger and be able to react with a hair-trigger, but also highly influenced by emotions and expectations. Participants were shown a series of ambiguous pictures that looked like this:
Before seeing the pictures, the participants were exposed to one of three different stimuli 1) no music 2) happy music or 3) scary music. Depending on what they heard, the participants saw different things. Here are the results as seen in the study.
The happy music didn't have a very pronounced effect, but the scary music did. So, for example, with the last image, about 30 percent saw a snake when they were exposed to no music, but about 70 percent saw the snake after hearing the scary music.
The take away from this, according to Wright, is that it shows how our emotions clearly influence our perceptions. Our feelings aren't necessarily an accurate guide to reality, but most of the time they serve us well. Let's say we recently heard that someone was bitten by a poisonous snake. And so next time we go for a walk in the woods, we're going to be in a heightened state of awareness. We will be more likely to perceive anything remotely snake-like to be a snake. The cost of a false positive is very low. We jump when we see a stick on the ground and laugh it off. But if we don't jump and it turns out to be a snake, we might have just removed our genes from the gene pool.
I think this kind of pareidolia or pattern recognition is different from our face recognition tendencies. Our brains are finely tuned to recognize faces and look for vital clues that pertain to both social sphere and environment. Seeing fear or joy or disappointment in someone's face, for example, gives us a good clue as to how we should act. Run, hide, attack, look for food, have sex, etc. Seeing Jesus in a grilled cheese sandwich may be just a different kind of false positive akin to seeing a snake in coil of rope. But also is obviously very much influenced by our prevailing cultural beliefs and expectations.
Before seeing the pictures, the participants were exposed to one of three different stimuli 1) no music 2) happy music or 3) scary music. Depending on what they heard, the participants saw different things. Here are the results as seen in the study.
The happy music didn't have a very pronounced effect, but the scary music did. So, for example, with the last image, about 30 percent saw a snake when they were exposed to no music, but about 70 percent saw the snake after hearing the scary music.
The take away from this, according to Wright, is that it shows how our emotions clearly influence our perceptions. Our feelings aren't necessarily an accurate guide to reality, but most of the time they serve us well. Let's say we recently heard that someone was bitten by a poisonous snake. And so next time we go for a walk in the woods, we're going to be in a heightened state of awareness. We will be more likely to perceive anything remotely snake-like to be a snake. The cost of a false positive is very low. We jump when we see a stick on the ground and laugh it off. But if we don't jump and it turns out to be a snake, we might have just removed our genes from the gene pool.
I think this kind of pareidolia or pattern recognition is different from our face recognition tendencies. Our brains are finely tuned to recognize faces and look for vital clues that pertain to both social sphere and environment. Seeing fear or joy or disappointment in someone's face, for example, gives us a good clue as to how we should act. Run, hide, attack, look for food, have sex, etc. Seeing Jesus in a grilled cheese sandwich may be just a different kind of false positive akin to seeing a snake in coil of rope. But also is obviously very much influenced by our prevailing cultural beliefs and expectations.
-Geo
Question everything
Question everything
- Harry Marks
-
Bookasaurus
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
- 13
- Location: Denver, CO
- Has thanked: 2341 times
- Been thanked: 1022 times
Re: Ch. 7: The Shadow Brain ("Good Thinking" - by Guy P. Harrison)
Very cool illustrations.geo wrote:In his Buddhism and Modern Psychology class, Robert Wright talks about a study by Jesse Prinz and Angelika Seidel that shows how the shadow brain is wired to look for danger and be able to react with a hair-trigger, but also highly influenced by emotions and expectations.
Yes, I think that is what I had in mind. Pattern recognition is a general ability of our nervous system, and a product of the shadow brain, but the "instantaneous" aspect of it is only relevant to the fact that the shadow brain can, in case of an emergency, act on its own without "vetting" its perceptions with "the boss."geo wrote:Seeing Jesus in a grilled cheese sandwich may be just a different kind of false positive akin to seeing a snake in coil of rope. But also is obviously very much influenced by our prevailing cultural beliefs and expectations.
If we thought we saw something that our conscious mind can verify to be probably impossible, then we do a double-take and realize that the perception was an illusion. So why do some perceptions resist such double-checking? Obviously culture plays a strong role.