Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Tue Dec 10, 2019 3:12 pm





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
Critical review of Haidt 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Book Aficionado

BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor 2

Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 1774
Thanks: 154
Thanked: 733 times in 551 posts
Gender: Male

Post Critical review of Haidt
I was looking for some critical reviews, I thought this one was pretty good:
http://readingsubtly.blogspot.com/2012/ ... athan.html

He addresses some of the points we have discussed already. I thought this was a good point, responding to Haidt's argument that "liberals" have too narrow a view of morality (the reviewer wants to defend liberalism and reason):

"the need to consider diverse beliefs—the pluralism that Haidt extolls—is precisely the impetus behind the efforts ethicists make to pare down the list of moral considerations."

He also reminded me that Kahneman's book, Thinking, Fast and Slow, would be a good follow-up read, that was on my list.

Quote:
Kahneman uses the metaphor of two systems to explain the workings of the mind. System 1, intuition, does most of the work most of the time. System 2 takes a lot more effort to engage and can never manage to operate independently of intuition.



The following user would like to thank Dexter for this post:
DWill
Mon Jul 16, 2012 9:27 pm
Profile Email
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Getting Comfortable


Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 8
Location: San Tan Valley, AZ
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 8 times in 5 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States Minor Outlying Islands (um)

Post Re: Critical review of Haidt
This review is well done and should be useful in this discussion. It also highlights some of the problems Haidt faces in trying to bring together the liberal and conservative sides in the division that is his book's primary focus. The reviewer seems to feel Haidt, a self confessed liberal, is disingenuous when he argues for the merits of conservative moral foundation values at the expense of liberal values. This may be correct but illustrates that no solution will be found by threatening either side.

My position is that both sides are human and are, therefore, subject to the same irrational reasoning flaws. We must both acknowledge doubt in regard to the certainty of our beliefs and reframe the discussion to focus upon finding a solution to the problems that threaten all of us.



The following user would like to thank scotchbooks for this post:
DWill
Mon Jul 16, 2012 11:57 pm
Profile Email
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Platinum Contributor

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6367
Location: Luray, Virginia
Thanks: 1850
Thanked: 2038 times in 1543 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Critical review of Haidt
I thought the review was well done, even though unlike both of you, I've only read the first section and so can't comment on how Haidt translates his insights into politics. The reviewer (whose name I couldn't find) tells us that later in the book Haidt comes out as pro-intuition to an extent and critical of liberals who refuse to honor intuitions (while being forced by human nature to respond to them nevertheless). The flavor I get from the first part is that he's describing what is, not that he's saying we should try to act more on our intuitions. Malcolm Gladwell does that in much of his popular book Blink. But clearly Haidt wants to recognize the validity of the conservative mindset, so he needs to find a way to favor those who don't try to resist their intuitions as much as he says liberals try to.

A sentence the reviewer quoted from the end of part one points out to me one problem with Haidt's presentation. "Anyone who values truth should stop worshipping reason." The very next sentence is not quoted but adds a twist: "We all need to take a cold hard look at the evidence and see reasoning for what it is." For one thing, the word "worshipping" is a bit inflammatory. JH again is digging at the New Atheists, who he says trash worship but in fact are worshipping their own idol, reason. I might believe this if he backed it up with quotations from any of those writers, who clearly do value reason, but worshipping is quite another matter and isn't a word that does Haidt's argument much credit. For another thing, in the next sentence, JH pulls a shift on us by saying that "reasoning" is the problem, a category that simply means what people offer up as justifications for their beliefs, whether sound or not. Haidt has already told us that reasoning evolved in order to give us a tool to protect our social standing and reputation, not as a way of finding the truth. Often, at least when it's morality or politics we're talking about, that rings true and is supported by research. But isn't reasoning used a great deal for non-suspect purposes? And unless Haidt is saying there is no truth and we shouldn't bother with it, don't we find truth through reason? We might also "experience" truth in a more intuitive manner; I think we do. It's not one or the other.



The following user would like to thank DWill for this post:
Robert Tulip
Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:03 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chris OConnor and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Site Resources 
HELPFUL INFO:
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!

IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

PROMOTE YOUR BOOK!
Advertise on BookTalk.org
How To Promote Your Book





BookTalk.org is a thriving book discussion forum, online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a community. Our forums are open to anyone in the world. While discussing books is our passion we also have active forums for talking about poetry, short stories, writing and authors. Our general discussion forum section includes forums for discussing science, religion, philosophy, politics, history, current events, arts, entertainment and more. We hope you join us!


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSOUR BOOKSAUTHOR INTERVIEWSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICYSITEMAP

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism Books

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2019. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank