• In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 756 on Tue Mar 19, 2024 3:41 am

Why is this book a classic on the literature circuit ?

#44: Feb. - Mar. 2008 (Fiction)
User avatar
DWill

1H - GOLD CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
16
Location: Luray, Virginia
Has thanked: 2262 times
Been thanked: 2470 times

Why is this book a classic on the literature circuit ?

Unread post

I liked the phrase used by another member to describe this novella's status. And I wondered what others would say after some days of discussion mainly of issues of controversy and theme. These are fine topics, but do they tell us that much about why this book is still read?

I had some things to say about the novella that might have sounded negative, so I wanted to be sure to say that on the matter that really counts, I think this is a great work. There was not a page--hardly a paragraph--where I didn't wonder at Conrad's mastery of language. He is a virtuoso; he can really "bring it!" His talent doesn't stop at that level, but it is probably what most impresses me. Anyone else have an opinion of Conrad as an artist?
User avatar
Ophelia

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
Oddly Attracted to Books
Posts: 1543
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:33 am
16
Location: France
Been thanked: 35 times

Unread post

DWill wrote:
I wondered what others would say after some days of discussion mainly of issues of controversy and theme. These are fine topics, but do they tell us that much about why this book is still read?

To be irreverent, I'll say that, yes, those topics are why the book is still read.

I remember grumbling to myself as a college student when somebody -- often the lecturer by himself-- would discuss why Milton's Areopagetica
was still read in the early 1980's. Simple: the professor who was in charge of seventeenth century English literature at the Sorbonne University had put it on the list -- sometimes the same professor had written the introduction to the French edition, or the translation into French.

:)


As I was reading about this book, I realized that it was often set reading for high school and college student in the US, so that is how many readers first experience Heart of Darkness.
Is this also the case in the UK Penelope?

I wondered what impression it made, how much the complexity of the language could discourage an average seventeen-year-old. If this difficulty could be overcome, I imagine young people that age would be interested.

Then, for high school teachers as for busy Booktalk readers, the book's being short is an advantage.


Finally (to go on with heresy) , the theme: which other books in English literature were written at that time about the colonization of Africa by the Europeans, giving themes and an interesting story?


Naturally, what you write about the beauty of the language is absolutely true.



Next, I wondered what made the book popular among people like us, who don't have to read it. (I'm sure Mr P will catch up soon).

The informal discussion we had about Heart of Darkness showed that everybody had read it many years before, in high school or at college, and was eager to read it again.
The discussion has been a success-- this is due to the fine minds of the participants naturally, but I think it must say something about the book.

Perhaps some of the new members who have joined us as we were discussing Heart of Darkness chose Booktalk because the novella was the current fiction discussion.


The one thing that didn't much work for me was the story about Mr Kurtz. I did not feel much anticipation before meeting him, and then even less seemed to be revealed than I had ancipated.
Perhaps this is an element in the book I need to go back to.
Ophelia.
User avatar
Penelope

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
One more post ought to do it.
Posts: 3267
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:49 am
16
Location: Cheshire, England
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 679 times
Gender:
Great Britain

Unread post

Please Miss, Ophelia said:-

The one thing that didn't much work for me was the story about Mr Kurtz. I did not feel much anticipation before meeting him, and then even less seemed to be revealed than I had ancipated.
Perhaps this is an element in the book I need to go back to.


Ophelia, I agree with you absolutely - Kurtz was supposed to be this tremendously charismatic character....but Conrad did not convey this in his (wonderful) writing. So Why? He knew what he was doing....I am sure....now why did he write Kurtz like this? Was it perhaps to show us the shallowness of 'Glamour'? We can all sit around nodding in agreement - which doesn't achieve anything - and we can become blinded by 'public opinion' - 'spin doctoring' - 'media rhetoric' - could this be why he gave us such a tenuous picture of this character?

I never heard of Joseph Conrad at school......I heard of 'Lord Jim' in later life......We were more likely to have been given 'Masterman Ready' by Captain Marryat - we were still taught - Rule Brittania - Land of Hope and Glory - and 'Aren't We Great' - in the 1950's. But my Son, in the late 1980's and early '90's did HD as a syllabus book.
User avatar
DWill

1H - GOLD CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
16
Location: Luray, Virginia
Has thanked: 2262 times
Been thanked: 2470 times

Unread post

Yeah, there was a great build-up for the entrance of Kurtz. By the time he comes on stage, I guess he's too wasted away to be able to show us his stuff. But I felt this as an anti-climax, too. Conrad keeps Kurtz pretty shadowy. I wonder if he did this in order to try to give him an air of mystery. He may have thought he could never describe Kurtz in such a way as to substantiate Marlow's awe of him, so he didn't even try. We just have Marlow telling us over and over what a powerful effect this guy had on him. Marlow even says that what was truly impressive about Kurtz was his voice, so of course Marlow wouldn't be able to convey that effect to his audience.

Does anyone grasp why Marlow so admires the last utterance of Kurtz? To me, the relationship is quite an enigma. Marlow tells the Intended that he knew Kurtz as well as any man could know anyone. Can this be true? Marlow feels a responsibility for Kurtz, but he doesn't even know why he feels it. He visits the Intended in the end without knowing why he's doing that, either. Incidentally, Marlow appears to be a bit psychotic at that point, still suffering from his illness, having some hallucinations.

I liked the things about the book that seemed absurd, such as the clerk in the starched collars in the middle of the jungle, the "pilgrims" with their staves, the Russian sailor in the parti-colored costume, the two women in black knitting in the antechamber like Greek Fates (I guess). Maybe part of the absurdity was also the role Marlow found himself playing, as he said, "the nightmare of my choice," when any choice of action would have been a nightmare. This quality could be something that links Conrad to modernism.

I do think I can defend his decision to lie to the Intended. Earlier in the story, he flashes forward to the scene and says that the reality of Kurtz's world just didn't belong in his fiance's world, that it would have been shattering for her to hear what Kurtz really said. And then, of course, Marlow would have to explain what the words meant. Right, I'm sure I would have ducked that one, too!
User avatar
Robert Tulip

2B - MOD & SILVER
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6497
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:16 pm
18
Location: Canberra
Has thanked: 2717 times
Been thanked: 2659 times
Contact:
Australia

Unread post

Promise and disappointment is a big theme in imperialism. Kurtz seems to share in the mystique of royalty, in that the idea is greater than the reality. Japanese Emperor Hirohito never appeared in public before Macarthur made him do so after the war. Like all imperialism (eg the Iraq war) lofty ideals such as freedom and justice have a major disconnect with their incompetent and compromised implementation. The trouble with Kurtz is that the 'redeeming idea' is so flagrantly at odds with the sordid reality that a rather gross deflation is inevitable on the slightest examination. I think the horror is what Kurtz has done to other human beings to get ivory.
User avatar
Ophelia

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
Oddly Attracted to Books
Posts: 1543
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2007 7:33 am
16
Location: France
Been thanked: 35 times

Unread post

Robert wrote:

"Promise and disappointment is a big theme in imperialism. Kurtz seems to share in the mystique of royalty, in that the idea is greater than the reality. Japanese Emperor Hirohito never appeared in public before Macarthur made him do so after the war. Like all imperialism (eg the Iraq war) lofty ideals such as freedom and justice have a major disconnect with their incompetent and compromised implementation. The trouble with Kurtz is that the 'redeeming idea' is so flagrantly at odds with the sordid reality that a rather gross deflation is inevitable on the slightest examination. I think the horror is what Kurtz has done to other human beings to get ivory."



Hello Robert,

Just a note to say that I sometimes don't answer your postings about HD for the very good reason that... everything is so well put that I have nothing to add! :)

So this mustn't be mistaken with ignoring you.

I like the reference you make here to Emperor Hirohito.
Ophelia.
User avatar
Penelope

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
One more post ought to do it.
Posts: 3267
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:49 am
16
Location: Cheshire, England
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 679 times
Gender:
Great Britain

Unread post

Well Robert, I think the horror is what Kurtz has done to himself, to get Ivory........

He gained the whole pile of Ivory....but he had lost his own soul....

well, I don't really believe a soul can be lost....but he certainly lost his way.

It is a bit like the Wizard of Oz when we meet Kurtz isn't it?
User avatar
Robert Tulip

2B - MOD & SILVER
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6497
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:16 pm
18
Location: Canberra
Has thanked: 2717 times
Been thanked: 2659 times
Contact:
Australia

Unread post

Penelope wrote:Well Robert, I think the horror is what Kurtz has done to himself, to get Ivory........ He gained the whole pile of Ivory....but he had lost his own soul.... well, I don't really believe a soul can be lost....but he certainly lost his way. It is a bit like the Wizard of Oz when we meet Kurtz isn't it?


No, no, non!! You are unwittingly falling for the Eurocentric fallacy
User avatar
Penelope

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
One more post ought to do it.
Posts: 3267
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:49 am
16
Location: Cheshire, England
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 679 times
Gender:
Great Britain

Unread post

I thought we were discussing what Kurtz meant by his exclamation.

I thought his exclamation about the horror....was his realising how he had wasted his life. I don't think Kurtz would have given the cruelties he had wreaked on the Africans a second thought.

I wasn't sympathising with Kurtz - just surmising as to what his last words meant.
User avatar
Robert Tulip

2B - MOD & SILVER
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6497
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:16 pm
18
Location: Canberra
Has thanked: 2717 times
Been thanked: 2659 times
Contact:
Australia

Unread post

Conrad is a master of ambiguity! Both meanings are very much there in Kurtz's last statement - a surface egocentric meaning of 'poor me' and a deeper objective meaning of 'what have I done to these people'.
Post Reply

Return to “Heart of Darkness - by Joseph Conrad”