Page 1 of 1
Ch. 6: Refuting God
Posted: Tue Oct 14, 2008 10:18 pm
by Chris OConnor
Ch. 6: Refuting God
Please use this thread for discussing this chapter.
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 3:06 pm
by realiz
Rather than refuting God, it seems to me that Dan is refuting the bible as the literal word of God. Proving bible passages about God's nature to be erroneous does not prove that no god exists, it proves that the people who wrote it were wrong or untruthful or mislead. It was the way they perceived god or wanted others to perceive god.
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 4:38 pm
by Interbane
The bible is the clay mold that most people use to believe in God. If and once removed, they still have God. The question is, should the existence of God be questioned since the mold originally used is faulty? I think so.
Posted: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:26 pm
by seespotrun2008
The question is, should the existence of God be questioned since the mold originally used is faulty?
Yes. Definitely. I think it is very important to stay humble as well and realize that we will probably never know anything for sure.