KindaSkolarly wrote:You would think that Democrats in America would be pleased today that President Trump isn't a Russian puppet. But that's not the case.
Actually I have heard quite a few say exactly that. But it's hard to blame them for reacting to veiled threats and obvious dishonesty by Dear Leader. The idea that the Dems have led in post-Mueller ungraciousness is quite humorous.
KindaSkolarly wrote:For the past two years the Left has said that it was pursuing Trump/Russia connections for the good of the country. They said they were patriots and so on.
Of course it would not have been a bi-partisan effort if not for the smoke of all the henchmen with connections to Russia, and all the denials (many blatantly untrue) about it. His campaign chairman was a Russian tool from years back. He falsely denied hotel or other projects in the works with the Russian government. Simple patriotism demanded an investigation, and of course Dear Leader tried to put the fix in, so it had to be a special prosecutor.
KindaSkolarly wrote: They supported the investigatory team headed by Clinton henchman Mueller and made up exclusively of Democratic Party hacks as it ate up two years investigating and probing.
Does it ever bother you to lie so blatantly about people? I mean, you might give a moment's thought to your credibility, now and then.
KindaSkolarly wrote: And now that team has said there is no Trump/Russia connection. And instead of being happy, Democratic Leftists are angrier than ever.
"Anger" kinda depends on who, and also on how things unfold next. I, for one, am angry about the vicious character assassination that goes on without stop from Dear Leader and his Foxes. After you have been lied to with a straight face enough times, you just despise the liars.
KindaSkolarly wrote:The U.S. Constitution came through once again. It saved the nation.
I would tend to agree with you about that. It remains to be seen whether Republicans are willing to join in safeguarding our elections from similar foreign machinations in the future.
KindaSkolarly wrote:While Mueller and his band of Leftists bankrupted people with legal fees, illegally leaked classified information, and used the media to spread the wildest conspiracies their fevered minds could concoct, the constitution's checks and balances prevented the coup d'état from succeeding.
I don't remember Kenneth Starr being shy about the legal fees of his targets, or about pursuing wild conspiracy theories. But in the case of the current administration, I have heard nothing of conspiracies but only crime after crime after crime. We know Dear Leader misrepresented his assets to banks, a crime, and we have good reason to believe that his henchmen, including in the family, have been engaged in money laundering for rich assassins. We know he directed his son to lie, his lawyer to lie, his lawyer to violate campaign finance laws, his FBI director to corruptly derail an investigation that might have featured national security concerns, his Acting AG to put a loyalist in charge of an investigation the man had already recused himself from, everyone in sight to hint about offers of pardon, and is now threatening retaliation for the probe as well as claiming exoneration by an investigation that explicitly stated he was not exonerated, probably making such a provocative and unusual statement precisely because of the dubious theory that a sitting "President" may not be indicted. If our Dear Leader was anything like an innocent man, he would be cooperating with the investigation in an effort to clear his name, but instead tosses around Mafia Don talk about rats and tough guys.
KindaSkolarly wrote:Now we need a reckoning. Failed coup plotters used to be summarily executed, or they fell on their swords. But this bunch of hateful anti-Americans won't dispatch themselves.
There is no evidence of anything remotely resembling a coup. At one point I was hearing this accusation about the suggestion of wearing a wire so Americans would know what their Dear Leader is like. That would be what brought down Richard Milhous Nixon, who was so paranoid he taped his own executive conversations, (mostly secretly from the other participants,) then directed his secretary to try to erase incriminating parts when the existence of the tapes became known. Know what Trump said about Nixon? He should have resisted with more toughness. Just what any innocent man, anyone concerned about the good of the country and the faithful execution of the laws of the land would say. The man is a walking assault on the rule of law.
KindaSkolarly wrote:So we need to do it. We need to do it by never voting Democratic again. My votes have been split evenly Dem/Rep in the past, voting for the best candidate, but never again.
I kind of like the idea that your paranoid rants will only attack Dems from now on. It sort of makes the point of moderate Democrats for them, without much more needing to be said about the party you are now backing.
KindaSkolarly wrote:The Democrats tried to overthrow a duly elected president, and they are unrepentant. They have attacked their own home. They are insane. They will keep attacking their home until they destroy it and all who are inside.
Presumably that's the way you felt about the Kenneth Starr investigation, and the Republicans who rejected the first special counsel investigation for not finding the wrong-doing they knew was there? So were you voting only Democrat for a while there?
I am not quite sure why you can't see that the attacking is being done by Dear Leader, who reached his party's nomination precisely by attack dog behavior and divisiveness that Putin can't help but love. I'm not sure why you can't see that Democrats love their country, including the people with pre-existing conditions. I really, really can't make sense of you. Whatever it is, I hope you are one day blessed by relief from this condition.