Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Fri Apr 10, 2020 3:30 am





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
10th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism: Tree of evolution is not in evidence 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Tenured Professor


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3564
Location: Michigan
Thanks: 1321
Thanked: 1151 times in 844 posts
Gender: Male

Post 10th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism: Tree of evolution is not in evidence
10th in the series is the video which caught my attention in the first place, and was the genesis of the
"Yes. Evolution." thread.

yes-evolution-t8939.html

Part 10 is listed below.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MXTBGcyNuc


_________________
In the absence of God, I found Man.
-Guillermo Del Torro

Have you tried that? Looking for answers?
Or have you been content to be terrified of a thing you know nothing about?

Are you pushing your own short comings on us and safely hating them from a distance?

Is this the virtue of faith? To never change your mind: especially when you should?

Young Earth Creationists take offense at the idea that we have a common heritage with other animals. Why is being the descendant of a mud golem any better?

Confidence being an expectation built on past experience, evidence and extrapolation to the future. Faith being an expectation held in defiance of past experience and evidence.


Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:06 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Tenured Professor


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3564
Location: Michigan
Thanks: 1321
Thanked: 1151 times in 844 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: 10th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism: Tree of evolution is not in evidence
I have commented extensively on this video in the "Yes. Evolution." thread.

I find this to be a compelling and interesting bit of knowledge. Why don't they teach us this stuff in school? haha.

This is exactly the argument you would have to have with someone who doesn't believe in our common ancestry with animals.

"My grammy wern't no dernd monkey!"

"Well, here's how we prove that she was. Was she alive?"

"She were! Afore she upndied!"

"That means she was of the class biota. Meaning all things that live. One comparison of shared traits she had with all living things on the planet, our most intrinsic relationship, and damning evidence that she shared at least that much in common with monkeys, though the correct terminology is apes."

"SHE WERNT NO APE NUTHER!"

"She had differentiated cell structures, though. That made her eukaryotic. Just like all her ancestors, all the way back to this point in the chain, she was also an opisthacant. She reproduced and the gamete cell involved had a single posterior flaggelum. That's the sperm cell."

"So!"

"Well, that means she is related to all animals who share that trait. there are many others with entirely different plans that have flagellum at the head and pull themselves through material, or along the sides and do sort of a rowing motion.

She had to eat in order to live, correct? She didn't photo-synthesize?"

"Of course!'

"That's the definition of metazoa. The animal kingdom. Animals must ingest and digest other organisms in order to survive. Your grandmother was an animal. And because your mother was her descendant, and in turn you are your mother's descendant, you too are an animal. You do that trick with a tubular internal digestive tract, which makes you a colemate. She was also bilaterally symetrical. As in, her right side was a mirror image of her left side, as opposed to radially symetrical organisms like trees."

"... yeah."

"She had a spinal chord, skull, backbones and a jaw?"

"Yuh."

"that categorically makes her a chordate, craniad, vertebrate, gnathostome, which means she shares heredity not only with apes, which have all of this, but also fish of most variety. At least she wasn't an arthropod. Those are disgusting."

"Nuh-uh! She didn't have no fins, or gills!"

"She had structures in her fetal development that were indistinguishable from gills in fetal fish. They went away as she developed, but they were there. No, she wouldn't have fins, because the kinds of fish she was related to were sarcopterygii. The kinds of fish that had lobe-like extrusions on their bodies. These lobey extrusions were proto-limbs which would one day come in handy to get themselves out of the water. Using a base of four of those, just like your grandmother some of those organisms became tetrapods, or four limbed creatures.

Do you see where i'm going with this? I am describing the cellular basis of your grandmother all the way up to the structure of her limbs and that is refining, and refining her description until we eventually get to Ape, which is irrefutably on the end of this list.

Denying that your grandmother was an ape is as futile as denying that she was a tetrapod. Humans are categorically apes. That's what it means to be human."

I could and would follow this progression all the way to our the utter explanation of every detail of our anatomy, but the point should have been made by then.


_________________
In the absence of God, I found Man.
-Guillermo Del Torro

Have you tried that? Looking for answers?
Or have you been content to be terrified of a thing you know nothing about?

Are you pushing your own short comings on us and safely hating them from a distance?

Is this the virtue of faith? To never change your mind: especially when you should?

Young Earth Creationists take offense at the idea that we have a common heritage with other animals. Why is being the descendant of a mud golem any better?

Confidence being an expectation built on past experience, evidence and extrapolation to the future. Faith being an expectation held in defiance of past experience and evidence.


The following user would like to thank johnson1010 for this post:
Frank 013, Robert Tulip
Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:32 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Worthy of Worship


Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2021
Location: NY
Thanks: 560
Thanked: 171 times in 118 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: 10th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism: Tree of evolution is not in evidence
Nicely laid out… however no matter how far you follow this logic, there are still some people who will remain “blind” to what you are saying. :lol:

Later


_________________
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.


The following user would like to thank Frank 013 for this post:
johnson1010
Fri Jan 28, 2011 5:16 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Tenured Professor


Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3564
Location: Michigan
Thanks: 1321
Thanked: 1151 times in 844 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: 10th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism: Tree of evolution is not in evidence
of course you are right, Frank. As we have seen on this website there are people who cannot be swayed by logic, reason, or the evidence all around them, no matter how abundant.

It is a good tool for those who deny out of ignorance, though, rather than blind devotion to a previous postion.


_________________
In the absence of God, I found Man.
-Guillermo Del Torro

Have you tried that? Looking for answers?
Or have you been content to be terrified of a thing you know nothing about?

Are you pushing your own short comings on us and safely hating them from a distance?

Is this the virtue of faith? To never change your mind: especially when you should?

Young Earth Creationists take offense at the idea that we have a common heritage with other animals. Why is being the descendant of a mud golem any better?

Confidence being an expectation built on past experience, evidence and extrapolation to the future. Faith being an expectation held in defiance of past experience and evidence.


Sat Jan 29, 2011 10:24 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Worthy of Worship


Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 2021
Location: NY
Thanks: 560
Thanked: 171 times in 118 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: 10th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism: Tree of evolution is not in evidence
Quote:
Johnson
It is a good tool for those who deny out of ignorance, though, rather than blind devotion to a previous position.

Absolutely… I love just how coherent the logic of that topic really is… You just need to know your facts and its slam dunk city! :D

It really is irrefutable and only ignorance or unreasonable willful blindness to the facts can leave a person unconvinced.

Later


_________________
That which can be asserted without evidence can be dismissed without evidence.


Sat Jan 29, 2011 4:25 pm
Profile Email
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Site Resources 
HELPFUL INFO:
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!

IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

PROMOTE YOUR BOOK!
Advertise on BookTalk.org
How To Promote Your Book





BookTalk.org is a thriving book discussion forum, online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a community. Our forums are open to anyone in the world. While discussing books is our passion we also have active forums for talking about poetry, short stories, writing and authors. Our general discussion forum section includes forums for discussing science, religion, philosophy, politics, history, current events, arts, entertainment and more. We hope you join us!


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSOUR BOOKSAUTHOR INTERVIEWSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICYSITEMAP

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism Books

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2019. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank