III- Narrative technique.
Conrad uses the device of a story-within- a story. An unnamed narrator recounts Marlow's recounting of his journey (Wikipedia).
What do you think of this device as used in HD?
Does it make the story different, or better than it would be with a traditional narrative?
-
In total there are 2 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 2 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 871 on Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:00 am
HD III- Narrative technique.
- Penelope
-
- One more post ought to do it.
- Posts: 3267
- Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:49 am
- 16
- Location: Cheshire, England
- Has thanked: 323 times
- Been thanked: 679 times
- Gender:
This is the telling of a Nightmare - and I think could only be effective told in the first person.
I found an intimacy in the use of language....short phrases as though the narrator is uttering his train of thought, rather than telling a story, and whispering in your ear:-
e.g. ....but there....there you could look at a thing monstrous and free. It was unearthly and the men were....No, they were not inhuman. Well, you know that was the worst of it - this suspicion of their not being inhuman. It would come slowly to one. They howled and leaped and spun and made horrid faces; but what thrilled you was just the though of their humanity - like yours - the thought of your remote kinship with this wild and passionate uproar. Ugly. Yes it was ugly enough:
I find this style of writing so intimate - I don't think I have ever read a book before with such an intense feeling of the author whispering it to you directly.
HD - Penguin Classics - Page 69
I found an intimacy in the use of language....short phrases as though the narrator is uttering his train of thought, rather than telling a story, and whispering in your ear:-
e.g. ....but there....there you could look at a thing monstrous and free. It was unearthly and the men were....No, they were not inhuman. Well, you know that was the worst of it - this suspicion of their not being inhuman. It would come slowly to one. They howled and leaped and spun and made horrid faces; but what thrilled you was just the though of their humanity - like yours - the thought of your remote kinship with this wild and passionate uproar. Ugly. Yes it was ugly enough:
I find this style of writing so intimate - I don't think I have ever read a book before with such an intense feeling of the author whispering it to you directly.
HD - Penguin Classics - Page 69
- DWill
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 6966
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
- 16
- Location: Luray, Virginia
- Has thanked: 2262 times
- Been thanked: 2470 times
An added dimension
I like the way Conrad's narrative adds depth to the story. The unnamed narrator strarts things off with a marvelous evocation of the Thames as night comes on. Perhaps this is even meant to contrast with the typical way Marlowe interprets scenery. But the first narrator also gives us little views of Marlowe himself from an objective point of view. He sits like an idol, he holds his hands outstretched like a buddha. This adds something to the great deal that Marlowe reveals to us about himself in his own story.
I also wonder if to Conrad, it was important to separate Marlowe from the "writing" of the story. That is left to the unnamed narrator, so that Marlowe can be only the sailor-raconteur.
I also wonder if to Conrad, it was important to separate Marlowe from the "writing" of the story. That is left to the unnamed narrator, so that Marlowe can be only the sailor-raconteur.
-
-
Genius
- Posts: 759
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:09 am
- 16
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 13 times