• In total there are 2 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 2 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 789 on Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:08 am

Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told

#155: Oct. - Dec. 2017 (Non-Fiction)
User avatar
Chris OConnor

1A - OWNER
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 17016
Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 2:43 pm
21
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 3509 times
Been thanked: 1309 times
Gender:
Contact:
United States of America

Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told

Unread post

Astrophysics for People in a Hurry
by Neil deGrasse Tyson

Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told
Please use this thread to discuss this chapter.
User avatar
Harry Marks
Bookasaurus
Posts: 1920
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
12
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 2335 times
Been thanked: 1020 times
Ukraine

Re: Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told

Unread post

It's a little bit awkward to see this treated as a "story" - the inferences drawn are based mainly on theory. Even later in the book we get to some possible problems with the "story." But there is some evidence behind it. The evenness of the cosmic background microwave radiation (CBMR? I think) [Edit: Cosmic Microwave Background, or CMB. Nice to have a little time to check Wikipedia.] seems to be the oddest bit. Unlike matter, which clumps in galaxies, the CBMR is astonishingly evenly distributed.

The aspect that I think gave me the most trouble, studying this long ago in my astronomy class, is that the universe expands including its space, not "within" space. I kept wanting to know where the center is. Nope. No center. Just one big "loop" (in three dimensions) within which everything is getting further and further from everything else (unless gravity is making it clump locally.)
Last edited by Harry Marks on Sat Oct 28, 2017 4:22 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Penelope

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
One more post ought to do it.
Posts: 3267
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:49 am
16
Location: Cheshire, England
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 679 times
Gender:
Great Britain

Re: Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told

Unread post

It seems that the beginning of everything was infinitesimally small. Even smaller than atoms and electrons? Is it still matter? Is it a thing? Or is it just a wave or vibration? We are all, everything is just vibration, is it not? That's why music affects us so much, and Hindu temples have gongs and bells which make your brain vibrate and feel refreshed. Roman Catholic Churches have bells too. Drums are used to great effect in many temples and times.

I've just visited Classical Greece where 3000 years ago, they designed theatres using Fibonacci mathematics, so that you could hear a pin drop on the back row.

It is wonderful and exciting. But when does a vibration become matter? Mass and matter can neither be created nor destroyed, I was told in my physics class. I am wondering??
Only those become weary of angling who bring nothing to it but the idea of catching fish.

He was born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world is mad....

Rafael Sabatini
User avatar
Robert Tulip

2B - MOD & SILVER
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6498
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:16 pm
18
Location: Canberra
Has thanked: 2718 times
Been thanked: 2661 times
Contact:
Australia

Re: Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told

Unread post

Harry Marks wrote:It's a little bit awkward to see this treated as a "story" - the inferences drawn are based mainly on theory. Even later in the book we get to some possible problems with the "story."
A story about the where the cosmos came from is known as a cosmogony. Science is just about facts, while stories are about what people consider important and why. Tyson jumps between science and story to make the astronomy interesting and lively. That is why Tyson introduces Biblical allusions, first with this chapter title and then explaining that the creation of hadrons prevented the ultimate let there be light scenario.

In the beginning with his preface he says the book aims to explain our place in the universe. My experience with astronomers is that they lacks interest in really doing that, since explaining our place brings in issues of philosophical values and significance that are outside astronomy.
User avatar
Harry Marks
Bookasaurus
Posts: 1920
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
12
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 2335 times
Been thanked: 1020 times
Ukraine

Re: Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told

Unread post

Penelope wrote:It seems that the beginning of everything was infinitesimally small. Even smaller than atoms and electrons? Is it still matter? Is it a thing?
Mass and matter can neither be created nor destroyed, I was told in my physics class. I am wondering??
Very pertinent questions. There are people working on possibilities, but I haven't been impressed with any I have heard about. The fact is cosmologists are just scrolling backwards on a "video" that we have a small, thin slice of. They assume that things before worked as they do now, for good reason, except that when you get to the first micro-mili-femto-second, you can't scroll back anymore. We have so few clues where all that Big Bang came from that theorists are free to make stuff up within very wide parameters. And they do.

However, as best I can verify from the perspective of an interested lay observer who has mainly kept up his Scientific American subscription and mainly read the cosmology articles, the stuff Tyson is laying out has pretty good reason to be accepted. We will probably find out, at some point, that much of the story of the early events has to be revised due to added learning about, oh, maybe how gravity and quantum mechanics interact, (or something,) but there is a decent chance that it all happened just as he stated it.

My reason for suspicion goes back to something said to me by a tenured physics prof at U Michigan (i.e. no slouch) which was that any time a singularity appears in physics, something is wrong with the theory. A singularity is anything where infinity gets treated as a quantity because something (like width or temperature) is going to zero. An example is an infinitely dense concentration of matter at the center of a black hole. It turns out, due to relativistic effects at the "event horizon" (from the beyond of which we cannot get any information) the infinitely dense concentration isn't. The matter is still falling (from our perspective) and still can leak out by quantum fluctuations (Hawking radiation).

So the fact that scrolling backward just gets us to a singularity means there is probably something we don't yet know about how the process works. Let's see. Something we don't yet know about matter/energy at quadrillions of times the energy levels of anything we have any way of learning about. How could that possibly be the case? LOL.
Penelope wrote:I've just visited Classical Greece where 3000 years ago, they designed theatres using Fibonacci mathematics, so that you could hear a pin drop on the back row.
I love that stuff. The demonstration was pretty awesome.
User avatar
Penelope

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
One more post ought to do it.
Posts: 3267
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:49 am
16
Location: Cheshire, England
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 679 times
Gender:
Great Britain

Re: Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told

Unread post

Robert, you say that science is just about facts. It isn't, it is about theory and most likely 'meaning/outcome, based on the accumulation of facts, don't you think? Isn't this why the author is calling it a story?

They get things wrong sometimes. Well....a bit wrong. I think it seems a bit like making a jigsaw puzzle and sometimes science gets a piece in the wrong place so we can't make sense of the whole picture.

Of course, it isn't so drastic when we get the sums wrong as to 'how' we are here, but when we start to make up stories as to 'why' we are here.....and then start fighting and killing one another as to whose story is the truth......Trouble is, there might not be a reason why and that thought, is freeing to some people, but unbearable to others of us.

.....the truth is so often disconcerting....

Rafael Sabatini
Only those become weary of angling who bring nothing to it but the idea of catching fish.

He was born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world is mad....

Rafael Sabatini
User avatar
Harry Marks
Bookasaurus
Posts: 1920
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
12
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 2335 times
Been thanked: 1020 times
Ukraine

Re: Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told

Unread post

Penelope wrote: you say that science is just about facts. It isn't, it is about theory and most likely 'meaning/outcome, based on the accumulation of facts, don't you think?

Well, that's always good for a lively discussion. Among wonks, anyway. Facts without a theoretical structure to give them meaning are, quite literally, random. But in science, the "meaning" comes from better ability to construct a (mental) model and figure out what the next questions are, and eventually to be able to make bridges and airplanes and skyscrapers and sewage treatment plants.
Penelope wrote:when we start to make up stories as to 'why' we are here.....and then start fighting and killing one another as to whose story is the truth......Trouble is, there might not be a reason why and that thought, is freeing to some people, but unbearable to others of us.
Well, that's why we have epistemology, and why people should always put persuasion ahead of imposition, when it comes to moral and mystical truth. The problem comes when religion gets involved in ethnic solidarity, so that economics comes into play. Then you can even get Buddhists to kill people (as in Myanmar today). But it isn't really for the sake of "religious truth" and you should never believe anyone who says it is.
User avatar
Penelope

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
One more post ought to do it.
Posts: 3267
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2007 11:49 am
16
Location: Cheshire, England
Has thanked: 323 times
Been thanked: 679 times
Gender:
Great Britain

Re: Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told

Unread post

Here in England during the Reformation thousands of people were burned at the stake just for being Protestant and then later, thousands of Catholic suffered the same fate, or worse, not having done anything wrong except practice their faith the way they had been taught.

At least scientists can't be accused of such. However, I don't think a scientific mind, a religious mind, or an artistic mind are mutually exclusive. They need to be approached differently. I find it more difficult to think scientifically but I can certainly see the benefit in attempting to do so and in doing so lose the bias in my character towards the spiritual or intuitive.

So I am struggling on with this book. I don't even know whether I am comprehending what I'm reading. I am, however, trying. I can't help visualising this first chapter as a kind of cosmic firework display.
Only those become weary of angling who bring nothing to it but the idea of catching fish.

He was born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world is mad....

Rafael Sabatini
User avatar
Robert Tulip

2B - MOD & SILVER
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6498
Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:16 pm
18
Location: Canberra
Has thanked: 2718 times
Been thanked: 2661 times
Contact:
Australia

Re: Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told

Unread post

Penelope wrote:Robert, you say that science is just about facts. It isn't, it is about theory and most likely 'meaning/outcome, based on the accumulation of facts, don't you think?
Hi Penelope. Scientific theory, such as the theory of gravity or the theory of evolution or the theory of relativity, is closely linked to factuality, with the observation that no factual evidence exists that contradicts these theories and abundant evidence confirms them. Scientific theories are factual, even if all predictions involve probability.
Your phrase “most likely 'meaning/outcome” is quite condensed. Many people regard meaning as related to human concerns, which is where stories get interesting, but the objective nature of scientific information disconnects its meaning from relevance to human life.
Penelope wrote: Isn't this why the author is calling it a story?
I think he is calling it a story in order to claim that the astronomical explanation of the universe is a greater story than the story of Jesus Christ, which is the origin of his chapter title, The Greatest Story Ever Told. Christianity tells the story of creation in Genesis to explain why human beings are important and why we are immoral. But Tyson aims to replace the Christian fantasy with scientific knowledge. It is just quite hard, as Carl Sagan noted in his book Pale Blue Dot, to explain the story of why humans are significant in objective terms when the universe is so big and old.
Penelope wrote: They get things wrong sometimes. Well....a bit wrong. I think it seems a bit like making a jigsaw puzzle and sometimes science gets a piece in the wrong place so we can't make sense of the whole picture.
Yes, the jigsaw puzzle piece in the wrong place is a good analogy for scientific theories that have anomalies. The hope of science is that the universe will prove to comply with elegant beautiful consistent mathematical laws, but the current state of astrophysics does not yet have such a theory of everything. I am more concerned where the jigsaw pieces are out of place in topics that matter to human concern, such as religion, climate change and politics. If we could somehow base our views on these topics on the objective truths of astronomy we might start to be more systematic.
Penelope wrote: Of course, it isn't so drastic when we get the sums wrong as to 'how' we are here, but when we start to make up stories as to 'why' we are here.....and then start fighting and killing one another as to whose story is the truth......Trouble is, there might not be a reason why and that thought, is freeing to some people, but unbearable to others of us. .....the truth is so often disconcerting.... Rafael Sabatini
We can’t really avoid the why question. Even saying there is no reason or that we can’t know is still an explanation of sorts. I prefer to say as an answer to why we are here that in scientific thought the universe reflects upon itself in symbols, and that this complex activity means human flourishing is intrinsically good.
User avatar
Harry Marks
Bookasaurus
Posts: 1920
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
12
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 2335 times
Been thanked: 1020 times
Ukraine

Re: Ch. 1: The Greatest Story Ever Told

Unread post

Penelope wrote:Here in England during the Reformation thousands of people were burned at the stake just for being Protestant and then later, thousands of Catholic suffered the same fate, or worse, not having done anything wrong except practice their faith the way they had been taught.
The idea that all the killing was just about abstract issues of religious belief is not tenable. Yes, many of the burnings of heretics (of both categories) were just about conscience, but mostly they were caught up in the fights about who could determine legitimacy of an heir, whether Rome or London had authority over the church, and whether the wealth of monasteries could be confiscated.

I don't mean to suggest that religion never becomes the cause of horrible doings, only that people who neglect the underlying economic tensions are fooling themselves.
Penelope wrote:However, I don't think a scientific mind, a religious mind, or an artistic mind are mutually exclusive. They need to be approached differently. I find it more difficult to think scientifically but I can certainly see the benefit in attempting to do so and in doing so lose the bias in my character towards the spiritual or intuitive.

An interesting partition. It might interest you to know that a sociologist of religion has (roughly) identified the three categories you present with the Christian intuitions of
Father (=science: authority of the immovability of fact),
Son (=religion: authority of devotion to the common good), and Holy Spirit (=arts: authority of inner experience and its communal meaning).
Post Reply

Return to “Astrophysics for People in a Hurry - by Neil deGrasse Tyson”