Please "check in" here if you plan to participate in Darwin's Dangerous Idea!
Everybody benefits by knowing who else is planning to read and discuss the book so please make a brief post here checking in and letting us know of your intention to join this book discussion.
-
In total there is 1 user online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 1 guest (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 851 on Thu Apr 18, 2024 2:30 am
Please "check in" here if you plan to participate in Darwin's Dangerous Idea!
- Chris OConnor
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 17024
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 2:43 pm
- 21
- Location: Florida
- Has thanked: 3513 times
- Been thanked: 1309 times
- Gender:
- Contact:
- DWill
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 6966
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
- 16
- Location: Luray, Virginia
- Has thanked: 2262 times
- Been thanked: 2470 times
Re: Please "check in" here if you plan to participate in Darwin's Dangerous Idea!
I plan to participate but may be skipping around in the book--just to give warning of what might seem an ADD approach. When I think about any book discussion I've been in, the book is never discussed in its entirety; rather, it always happens that a certain few topics grab the attention of the group. Keeping to chapter sequence usually doesn't work.
- geo
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
- 15
- Location: NC
- Has thanked: 2198 times
- Been thanked: 2200 times
Re: Please "check in" here if you plan to participate in Darwin's Dangerous Idea!
I'll be participating. Looking forward to it.
-Geo
Question everything
Question everything
- Chris OConnor
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 17024
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 2:43 pm
- 21
- Location: Florida
- Has thanked: 3513 times
- Been thanked: 1309 times
- Gender:
- Contact:
Re: Please "check in" here if you plan to participate in Darwin's Dangerous Idea!
I'm going to read the chapter Bully for Brontosaurus first myself. I'm guessing this book can be read out of order without too much of an issue.
- LevV
-
- Agrees that Reading is Fundamental
- Posts: 275
- Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:45 pm
- 13
- Location: Nova Scotia, Canada
- Has thanked: 117 times
- Been thanked: 202 times
Re: Please "check in" here if you plan to participate in Darwin's Dangerous Idea!
I'm in. I expect to have my copy any day now.
For the record, I'm just now completing the last chapter of the Bryson book after taking a number of detours through chapters of "Cosmos", "Origins Reconsidered" and "Sapiens" for more info on favorite topics.
I expect to be dipping further into Harari's "Sapiens" as I get into Dennett's book.
For the record, I'm just now completing the last chapter of the Bryson book after taking a number of detours through chapters of "Cosmos", "Origins Reconsidered" and "Sapiens" for more info on favorite topics.
I expect to be dipping further into Harari's "Sapiens" as I get into Dennett's book.
- Robert Tulip
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 6502
- Joined: Tue Oct 04, 2005 9:16 pm
- 18
- Location: Canberra
- Has thanked: 2721 times
- Been thanked: 2665 times
- Contact:
- DWill
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 6966
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
- 16
- Location: Luray, Virginia
- Has thanked: 2262 times
- Been thanked: 2470 times
Re: Please "check in" here if you plan to participate in Darwin's Dangerous Idea!
Well why not start there, then? When is this discussion set to start, Chris?Chris OConnor wrote:I'm going to read the chapter Bully for Brontosaurus first myself. I'm guessing this book can be read out of order without too much of an issue.
- Dexter
-
- I dumpster dive for books!
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:14 pm
- 13
- Has thanked: 144 times
- Been thanked: 712 times
Re: Please "check in" here if you plan to participate in Darwin's Dangerous Idea!
I'm going to make a sincere effort to read the whole thing, I want to get the full background, I'm not sure how independent the chapters are. I see there is some material on morality towards the end, I happened to be reading a bit on meta-ethics, so I'm very interested in what he has to say, as it seems to me you've got to bring in evolution to have a complete discussion of the subject.
- Harry Marks
-
Bookasaurus
- Posts: 1920
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
- 12
- Location: Denver, CO
- Has thanked: 2335 times
- Been thanked: 1020 times
Re: Please "check in" here if you plan to participate in Darwin's Dangerous Idea!
I will be participating. I have comments already for Ch. 1.
I have read a good part of Ch. 10, and find it to be distressingly badly written. Rather than sorting out what the issues are and doing his best to resolve them, Dennett accuses Gould of switching the grounds for "debate" and then proceeds to demonstrate in lurid detail that he cannot himself decide what is at issue. Well, maybe I will skip over to comment on Ch. 10 quite soon.
However, I think it is important to try to put it in the context of his philosophical points, and I have not read those yet. The issue of "telos" (roughly, purpose or goal) is a crucial one for philosophy, with many widely varying claims being made about it, some of them mutually incompatible. Arguably it is the reason for reading Dennett's book. I am really only interested in his back and forth with Gould to the extent that it sheds any light on how we should approach the issue of "telos".
And, since I did not get back to the "which book should we read" thread quickly enough to reply, let me say that I have no reason to believe that "punctuated equilibrium" has been discredited. Although there seem to have been points on which Gould has been shown to have claimed too much for it, the basic idea of stasis and the math behind the challenge by Mayr, Gould and Eldredge to a gradualistic idea of genetic change and speciation seem to be pretty solid. I think it would be great if more light got shed on that question, as it is pretty interesting to my mind.
I have read a good part of Ch. 10, and find it to be distressingly badly written. Rather than sorting out what the issues are and doing his best to resolve them, Dennett accuses Gould of switching the grounds for "debate" and then proceeds to demonstrate in lurid detail that he cannot himself decide what is at issue. Well, maybe I will skip over to comment on Ch. 10 quite soon.
However, I think it is important to try to put it in the context of his philosophical points, and I have not read those yet. The issue of "telos" (roughly, purpose or goal) is a crucial one for philosophy, with many widely varying claims being made about it, some of them mutually incompatible. Arguably it is the reason for reading Dennett's book. I am really only interested in his back and forth with Gould to the extent that it sheds any light on how we should approach the issue of "telos".
And, since I did not get back to the "which book should we read" thread quickly enough to reply, let me say that I have no reason to believe that "punctuated equilibrium" has been discredited. Although there seem to have been points on which Gould has been shown to have claimed too much for it, the basic idea of stasis and the math behind the challenge by Mayr, Gould and Eldredge to a gradualistic idea of genetic change and speciation seem to be pretty solid. I think it would be great if more light got shed on that question, as it is pretty interesting to my mind.
- Dexter
-
- I dumpster dive for books!
- Posts: 1787
- Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:14 pm
- 13
- Has thanked: 144 times
- Been thanked: 712 times
Re: Please "check in" here if you plan to participate in Darwin's Dangerous Idea!
Re-reading the first 2 chapters of this book, I think it is some brilliant writing, putting some context in the history of thought, then illustrating the importance of Darwin.
But some of the reviews point out his digressions into debating with Gould and others. There may be some interesting issues there, hopefully it doesn't get bogged down too much.
I've read and listened to Dennett's debate on free will with Sam Harris, and I found that Dennett was uncharitable and even disingenuous. So while I expect to learn from him, I will definitely be reading his opinions with a critical eye.
But some of the reviews point out his digressions into debating with Gould and others. There may be some interesting issues there, hopefully it doesn't get bogged down too much.
I've read and listened to Dennett's debate on free will with Sam Harris, and I found that Dennett was uncharitable and even disingenuous. So while I expect to learn from him, I will definitely be reading his opinions with a critical eye.