Going Clear - by Lawrence Wright
Chapter 2: Source

Please talk about Chapter 2: Source in this thread.

What a long chapter! But I guess you need the background to figure out how he came up with all of this.

Wright wants to show that Hubbard was remarkable in some ways, and Wright demonstrates this. Clearly he was a brilliant man, with some qualities you could call admirable. He wasn't deterred by failure, only seemed to grow more determined and convinced of his specialness. But from another angle, sociopathy seems evident in his disregard for others and his outrageous lying. He also appeared to be a coward, for all of his bravado. He seems to be a peculiarly American type of self-inventor, not unlike Fitzgerald's Jay Gatsby. You also might have seen the late Philip Seymour Hoffman play a character modeled after Hubbard in "The Master," which also is about a religious fraud.

Found a book presentation for the book with Lawrence Wright presenting it is very good. http://www.c-span.org/video/?316330-3/b ... oing-clear. I actually liked the second link I am providing here better though.http://www.c-span.org/video/?310573-1/b ... oing-clear

I saw that movie "The Master"

I thought it was bad.

I'm on Ch. 2, I'm going to try to get back to the book (I shouldn't commit to anything, I always end up putting it off, it's like buying a book and then leaving it on your shelf).

in the meantime, here's an NBC segment on it

This chapter depicts a man who was a lot worse than the one described in the HBO doc. As I recall, the film didn't delve deeply into Hubbard's craziness. He's a megalomaniac and entirely delusional. His shrewdness was what made him really so threatening, though. He knew where the money was.

I can't find the quote, but early in this chapter Wright observes that writing science fiction is similar to constructing theology. Interesting. I wonder whether that applies to the type of SF that Hubbard wrote, rather than SF in general. Anyone ever read Hubbard's fiction? I would expect his characterization to be pretty poor, but I don't really know.

It's fascinating to see almost firsthand the development of a religion, with Scientology and Mormonism being recent enough to have origins not buried in the distant past, as with Christianity. We can see how religions develop in response to the facts on the ground, as Robert Wright showed us in The Evolution of God.

I think this book is going to be a bit of a challenge to digest and discuss - there is so much mania, madness, abuse, and downright lunacy!

Just listing a few tidbits from this chapter so far:
p. 26 - A failed manic film expedition. How did LRH fancy himself qualified to do this?
p. 29 - LRH has a near death experience in a dentist chair and believes the secrets of the universe have been revealed to him.
p. 30 - LRH writes a small book about this experience. "Hubbard sent excited telegrams to publishers in New York, inviting them to meet him at Penn Station where he would auction off a manuscript that would change the world." Wow, breathtaking mania.
p. 33 - Another failed overblown voyage, the "Alaskan Radio Experimental Expedition".
p. 45 - LRH explores black magick in the manner of Aleister Crowley. Hubbard works on a ceremony called the "Babalon Working", attempting to create a "moonchild" who becomes the Antichrist. When he hears of these activities, Crowley states "I get fairly frantic when I contemplate the idiocy of these goats." Wow, when you get a reaction like that from Mr. Crowley, there's your ticket for the Clue Bus!
p. 45 - LRH's son L. Ron Hubbard Jr. states "Black magic is the inner core of Scientology - and it is probably the only part of Scientology that really works."

And we're just barely getting warmed up!

It's a small item in a local paper, but even so Hubbard can't help himself, his arrogance and mania come through. Although as Wright states elsewhere, qualities such as these and the con-artist would almost be required in anyone who starts a new religion. Joseph Smith and many other cult leaders had these qualities. The Gautama Buddha might be one exception.