Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Nov 18, 2019 5:04 am





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
Ch. 4: What are things made of? 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

BookTalk.org Owner
Diamond Contributor 3

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 16170
Location: Florida
Thanks: 3493
Thanked: 1326 times in 1045 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

 Ch. 4: What are things made of?
Ch. 4: What are things made of?

Please use this thread to discuss the above chapter.



Wed Apr 10, 2013 3:59 pm
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

BookTalk.org Moderator
Platinum Contributor

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4384
Location: NC
Thanks: 1861
Thanked: 1931 times in 1446 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: Ch. 4: What are things made of?
In Ch. 4, Dawkins presents an overview of atoms. Early cultures concluded that matter is composed of four basic elements: air, water, fire, and earth. But one Greek—Democritus—came closer to the truth with the idea that if you cut something up into smaller and smaller pieces, you would eventually reach a piece that was so small that it couldn't be cut further. The Greek word for 'cut' is tomos, so 'atomic' means it can't be cut further.

As many of us know from high school chemistry, there are about 100 different kinds of atoms—the real elements—identified by their atomic number. This was a good overview of atoms, molecules, crystals, and the difference between solids, gases, and liquids—why we can walk through gases, swim through liquids but cannot move through solids.

We can't actually see atoms because they are so small. We surmise their existence by creating models and testing them to see if our predictions turn out correct. To me, this is where the discussion of atoms gets so strange. The world of the very small is so bizarre and not easily imagined. Dawkins says that's why there are no myths or legends that try to explain the world at an atomic level because early cultures would have no way of knowing that it even existed. I thought this would be an uncontroversial chapter, but in the final two paragraphs, Dawkins segues into a why our "holy books" don't include information about atoms and the universe. Here are the last couple of sentences:

Quote:
In fact, unsurprisingly, the stories in holy books don't contain any more information about the world than was known to the primitive peoples who first started them! If these 'holy book' really were written, or dictated, or inspired, by all-knowing gods, don't you think it's odd that those gods said nothing about any of these important and useful things?


So when we first started reading THE MAGIC OF REALITY, I wondered if Dawkins would show the anti-religion slant for which he is so famous—more so than that of his role as a science educator. To some extent there probably needs to be some delving into the realm of religious belief. And I do think the question he ends with here is valid, especially since he does begin most chapters with a myth that segues into how things really are.

At the same time, I hate that the conversation gets dragged down to a Creationist mindset. It should be assumed that the readers of this book do not accept a literal interpretation of the Bible. Perhaps Dawkins should focus entirely on the magic of reality and leave out such editorializing. It's possible that Dawkins enjoys the controversy. He certainly knew that these last couple of paragraphs would send Creationists and their apologists into a tizzy.


_________________
-Geo
Question everything


Sun May 19, 2013 12:47 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

BookTalk.org Moderator
Platinum Contributor

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 4384
Location: NC
Thanks: 1861
Thanked: 1931 times in 1446 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: Ch. 4: What are things made of?
By the way, I don't know if there's a discussion leader for this book. I'm just tossing out my own comments as I read along. Since I'm the first one commenting, I include an overview of the chapter as well. Hope I'm not stepping on anyone's toes.

It's a great little book by the way. I keep thinking the younger version of me would have loved it.


_________________
-Geo
Question everything


Sun May 19, 2013 1:10 pm
Profile
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Platinum Contributor

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6346
Location: Luray, Virginia
Thanks: 1843
Thanked: 2028 times in 1536 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Ch. 4: What are things made of?
He just can't bite his tongue! I'm not too sure that having anti-religious designs is much better than having religious ones, but he's the boss. My own opinion: if you're doing science with young people, hit them with the cool factor and with that alone. That's what will bring them over. I imagine Dawkins does follow that approach in the book in general. He doesn't need to anti-proselytize.



The following user would like to thank DWill for this post:
geo
Sun May 19, 2013 7:26 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Site Resources 
HELPFUL INFO:
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!

IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

PROMOTE YOUR BOOK!
Advertise on BookTalk.org
How To Promote Your Book





BookTalk.org is a thriving book discussion forum, online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a community. Our forums are open to anyone in the world. While discussing books is our passion we also have active forums for talking about poetry, short stories, writing and authors. Our general discussion forum section includes forums for discussing science, religion, philosophy, politics, history, current events, arts, entertainment and more. We hope you join us!


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSOUR BOOKSAUTHOR INTERVIEWSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICYSITEMAP

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism Books

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2019. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank