• In total there are 8 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 7 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 789 on Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:08 am

The Signature of All Things

Share your current reading list, your impressions of the books, and whether you'd recommend them to fellow community members. Authors, please do NOT post in this forum.
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.

All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
User avatar
DWill

1H - GOLD CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
16
Location: Luray, Virginia
Has thanked: 2262 times
Been thanked: 2470 times

The Signature of All Things

Unread post

I read this one on a friend's recommendation. It's by Elizabeth Gilbert, a writer I recognized only by her memoir Eat. Pray, Love. Never read the book, but carried a prejudice against it anyway as an example of privileged navel-gazing. I might read it now, because Gilbert's a wonderful writer as evidenced by this sweeping story of a fictional mid-19th Century botanist who independently formulates a theory of species change very much like Darwin's. The catch is that, like Darwin, she was reluctant to publish because she wasn't absolutely sure of her theory's soundness. What prevented her from publishing in 1854 is that her theory of "competitive advantage" couldn't account for human altruism, she believed. So Darwin, spurred by Wallace's concurrent discovery of natural selection, publishes first, and Alma Whittaker remains an obscure expert on mosses (bryology). In the end, though, she meets Alfred Russell Wallace and shows him her manuscript, getting intense satisfaction from Wallace's declaration that she was second (before Wallace himself) to figure out how species develop.

I don't think that altruism really is inconsistent with natural selection, but despite that disagreement I really enjoyed this longer novel. It wasn't as good in the second half as in the first, but still was pretty compelling because of the vivid and credible characterization. One difference about it, compared to other books about Victorians, is that Alma Whittaker's strong sexual desires are given attention, though she remains a virgin throughout her life.
User avatar
Harry Marks
Bookasaurus
Posts: 1920
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
12
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 2335 times
Been thanked: 1020 times
Ukraine

Re: The Signature of All Things

Unread post

What an interesting story! Who would have thought of inventing a character in such a position? I don't think it is so inconsistent that she would have had trouble with squaring altruism with natural selection. There were many such puzzles, around music and art and hermits and people raising other people's children, and if I recall my Darwin-lore, he put a lot of trouble into sketching some sort of attempt to explain these phenomena that were not "bred out" of us by natural selection.

I have more trouble with strong sexual desires combining with remaining a virgin, though I suppose there are some possible explanations having to do with the implications of sexual relations for her intellectual life.
User avatar
DWill

1H - GOLD CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
16
Location: Luray, Virginia
Has thanked: 2262 times
Been thanked: 2470 times

Re: The Signature of All Things

Unread post

What I was thinking, Harry, is that if the development of strong empathy could be called a key to humans' ability to form groups that pushed survival (I'd claim that, at least), then the existence of altruism almost follows naturally. Altruism doesn't by a long shot cancel out the primary urge to ensure the survival of the individual and his/her kin. So what could altruism be called in evolution-speak--a spandrel? Alma Whittaker might have thought that every trait needed to tie into the individual's ability to survive, but apparently that's not how it works. If the suite of traits does the job, the species can thrive. In terms of the fiction, though, it's not far-fetched that the character would see altruism as a dilemma.

As for sex, Alma was a large, unattractive woman. She never attracted a mate. She didn't in the book reflect on the Darwinian logic of men not wanting her.
Post Reply

Return to “What are you currently reading?”