Much - Yes! Concepts were derived at that I would have never come up with. Thanks for your astute observation.

brother bob wrote:Much - Yes! Concepts were derived at that I would have never come up with. Thanks for your astute observation.

Did you add your god as one of the authors of the book? Does it say so on the cover? If not, isn't that plagiarism?

The book will tell you the purpose for your. That society and I have never derived at before. Many concepts that men want answers to are provided. Proving God off of a blank sheet of paper. Proving all religions are wrong, right or one is right. What it is like to be in the presence of God and hell in two minutes explanation where of the 300 (over 85% knew nothing about God), only one disagreed with the concept presented. Is there a hell? What is it like? Why would a God die for something I did wrong? Why does God not intervene in rape, war, pestilence and famine? What did God say about slavery, stoning, genocide and eating of certain foods? These and a ton more questions are answered.

I didn't put my name of the cover of the book.

brother bob wrote:The book will tell you the purpose for your. That society and I have never derived at before. Many concepts that men want answers to are provided. Proving God off of a blank sheet of paper. Proving all religions are wrong, right or one is right. What it is like to be in the presence of God and hell in two minutes explanation where of the 300 (over 85% knew nothing about God), only one disagreed with the concept presented. Is there a hell? What is it like? Why would a God die for something I did wrong? Why does God not intervene in rape, war, pestilence and famine? What did God say about slavery, stoning, genocide and eating of certain foods? These and a ton more questions are answered.

You make an enormous number of grammatical mistakes in your posts on this site. Did you make sure your book was clean of mistakes before publishing?

And what about crediting your god with authorship? Did you do that? In your response to me, you didn't mention an answer to that.

EDIT: I see that you didn't put your name on the cover. So who did you credit with authorship? Anybody?

If you read the preface it states I make no claim for the profound material that is ultimately declared truth by the many I have interviewed and discussed the concepts with.

Yes, You can pick on my grammar as it is porous in nature.

I only placed my name on the spine and picture in the book so someone would not impersonate me. But thanks for your observations again.

Maybe you should be more worried about finding truth instead of shooting the messenger. I lay much blame at my feet during the book. Tks

brother bob wrote:If you read the preface it states I make no claim for the profound material that is ultimately declared truth by the many I have interviewed and discussed the concepts with.

That sounds good, actually.

So are you going to read it or just make snide remarks? Put your money where your mouth is. You might learn something. I had to.

brother bob wrote:So are you going to read it or just make snide remarks? Put your money where your mouth is. You might learn something. I had to.

I was being serious when I said "that sounds good, actually".

I've heard fifty billion pro-theist arguments in the past and none of them impressed me, so please forgive me, but I won't be reading your book.

bob, have you thought of doing a basic english course?

i mean if Yahweh is going to use you to communicate these truths it might be an idea to at least get a basic grasp of how english works.

you can just see Yahweh up there thinking, ok, i'm going to communicate with english readers, now who shall i pick.... oh there he is, brother bob!

seriously though bob, it might not be wise to credit God with the book because people might get the idea english isn't his first language.

DWill, the irony of the title of the book.

Come on MAN, Speak English to ME about GOD

bob wrote:What method has changed gain a scientific fact?
Just because one stands in a garage, no matter how long, is still not a car!
The age of the earth is discussed in a manner I have not found as evidence never provided.
- brother bob

actually i find bob's use of english a laugh riot, i have had tears of mirth streaming from my eyes as i have seen what bob can do with a sentence, one of my favourite bobisms

bob wrote:If I did not know these concepts and then they were made known to me by know one else (humanely speaking)

i like bob, sure he came in like a hurricane to school us unbelieving heathen but i sense his genuine concern.

so what if there are a crowd of english teachers with pitchforks gathering outside his home, i still love him.

so what if he is to english what Atilla the Hun was to democratic process, it's all good.

i do feel sorry for that Kirkus reviewer though, can you imagine

page one, WTF! is this english?, oh well give him a go..
page two, holy shit, what have i got myself into...
page three, i'm in hell ...

i thought the Kirkus reviewer did really well to keep it sweet, indeed i felt they deserved a hug after going through that.

"passionate but flawed"

honestly someone has to try to get bob enrolled in an english course.

you usually find just reading a lot will fix most problems.