Just started perusing the site and to be honest, he's not off to a good start. I quote:>Most of today's "accepted" astronomy/cosmology is a>set of deductively arrived at hypotheses precariously>based on two false assumptions :>1 Electrical fields, currents, and plasma discharges are>not important in space. Only gravitational and magnetic>fields are important.> 2 ...Astrophysicists tend to use 'electromagnetic' fields, as do most physicists beyond high school. The magnetic field being a relatavistic effects of the propogation of changes in the electric field.& this is in the intro so it doesnt bode well...

The subject of red shift can be pursued in a book byHalton Arp, SEEING RED. Arp's website and that of Tony Perratt as well can be found in the Links section at www.electric_cosmos.org Halton Arp believes that red shift equals age and notdistance. A true voice in the wilderness.

The subject of red shift is explored in a book by Halton Arp, SEEING RED. Arp contends that red shiftequals age and not distance. His website is found inthe links section at www.electric_cosmos.org.