Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Dec 08, 2019 2:51 pm





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 246 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 1, 5.00 on the average.Evaluations: 1, 5.00 on the average.Evaluations: 1, 5.00 on the average.Evaluations: 1, 5.00 on the average.Evaluations: 1, 5.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17
The Case Against the Historic Jesus Christ 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 5832
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 2289
Thanked: 2216 times in 1675 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post Re: The Case Against the Historic Jesus Christ


That lady really looks like she is struck by the spirit of the Lord, and pretty hard too. There is something about evangelical worship that often creates a slightly cross-eyed and addled appearance, especially in pastors. Its like if you try to talk sense to them they just can't hear. Perhaps it is from too much believing stuff that just ain't so, per Mark Twain's definition of faith. Its like the synapses just fuse. Lets pray for her soul youkrst. I hope her brain has not irrecoverably melted down. There is still hope.


_________________
http://rtulip.net


Sat Jan 30, 2016 2:02 am
Profile Email WWW
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
One with Books

Silver Contributor

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2751
Thanks: 2298
Thanked: 731 times in 626 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: The Case Against the Historic Jesus Christ
well it sure is amazing what a few bad ideas can do to someone.

just a simple idea like... you are born in sin.

it can then take root and grow in your psyche

just a simple idea like... Satan is a fallen angel, a conscious intelligent malevolent spiritual being.

it takes root in the psyche, it grows

these ideas choke out reason and truth until a person becomes a deformed caricature, the psyche is all bent out of shape and wont function properly. the person is trapped in their own metaphor.

but the truth is powerful and as long as there is a part left inside to respond to it healing can ensue. Somewhere inside the psyche is a sick thing that is proud and would rather see the gainsayer pay for his insolence but somewhere in the psyche is a worthy aspect that says, will God really condemn these beautiful atheists to separation? Did He not make them so?

my aim is always to provoke a chance for the worthy aspect to prevail against it's enemies but that's the sort of high drama i go for, i'm a mythologist.

someone else might simply say, let truth and reason win the day to set men free from mind forged manacles.



The following user would like to thank youkrst for this post:
geo, Robert Tulip
Sat Jan 30, 2016 2:36 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Likes the book better than the movie


Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 841
Thanks: 36
Thanked: 470 times in 359 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: The Case Against the Historic Jesus Christ
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opncVf-eKec



The following user would like to thank DB Roy for this post:
youkrst
Fri Feb 05, 2016 3:19 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Just realized BookTalk.org is awesome!

Silver Contributor

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 791
Location: Florida
Thanks: 311
Thanked: 464 times in 359 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: The Case Against the Historic Jesus Christ
DB Roy wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=opncVf-eKec


:lol:



The following user would like to thank Taylor for this post:
youkrst
Fri Feb 05, 2016 5:51 pm
Profile Email
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
One with Books

Silver Contributor

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2751
Thanks: 2298
Thanked: 731 times in 626 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: The Case Against the Historic Jesus Christ
many a true word spoken in jest indeed :lol:



Fri Feb 05, 2016 7:10 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Nutty for Books


Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 1581
Location: Dublin
Thanks: 832
Thanked: 704 times in 604 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Ireland (ie)

Post Re: The Case Against the Historic Jesus Christ
Flann 5 wrote:
youkrst wrote:
Quote:
Paul never mentions Galilee or Nazareth, or Pilate or Mary or Joseph, or any miracles Jesus did or any miraculous powers he is supposed to have displayed . . . or anything about the life of Jesus not in the Gospels. Paul never references any event in Jesus’ life as an example to follow (beyond the abstractions of love, endurance and submissiveness), and never places anything Jesus said in any earthly historical context whatever. So far as these letters tell us, no Christian ever asked Paul about these things, either. Nor did any of these things ever become relevant in any dispute Paul had with anyone. Not one of his opponents, so far as Paul mentions, ever referenced a fact about Jesus’ life in support of their arguments. And no one ever doubted anything claimed about Jesus and asked for witnesses to confirm it or explain it or give more details. The interest Tacitus showed in Pliny’s father is never exhibited by any of them, nor is Pliny’s eagerness to talk about his father ever exhibited by Paul in his eagerness to talk about Jesus— and yet Paul talks obsessively and repeatedly about Jesus. That’s all simply bizarre. And bizarre means unexpected, which means infrequent, which means improbable. Accordingly, historicists have to explain why in Paul’s letters there are no disputes about what Jesus said or did, and why no specific example from his life is ever referred to as a model, not even to encourage or teach anything or to resolve any disputes, and why the only sources Paul ever refers to for anything he claims to know about Jesus are private revelations and hidden messages in scripture (Element 16), and why Paul appears not to know of there being any other sources than these (like, e.g., people who knew Jesus). Whatever explanation historicists devise for these curiosities has to be demonstrably true, and not something they just make up to explain away the evidence.
All that from Carrier's book.

Richard Carrier and Earl Doherty build much of their hypothesis on the book of Hebrews. There it talks about Christ entering into heaven itself as a high priest and his blood making atonement for sins there.
We are told in Hebrews that the earthly temple in Jerusalem was patterned on the heavenly one as revealed to Moses.

But Carrier goes a giant step further to argue that everything on earth was believed to have a corresponding reality in this heavenly realm including cats. They supposedly believed in effect in a parallel world in some sublunar zone.

This concept is not found in the Jewish O.T. but some elements of it may be found in pseudepigraphal writings such as 2 Enoch and The Ascension of Isaiah on which he builds a great deal of his hypothesis.

Carrier is quite correct to insist that Paul maintains that much of what he preaches came to him by revelation from Christ and not from man.
And apologists don't give due weight to his argument here. It does seem unlikely that he was entirely ignorant of the beliefs of the religion he was persecuting,and he was present at the stoning of Stephen in Jerusalem according to the writer of Acts.
Nonetheless granting Carrier his premise of revelation he still has a major problem which is that Paul in his teachings does in fact place Christ on earth.
For example in Ephesians 4:9 he says that; "Now this "he ( Christ) ascended"-what does this mean but that he also first descended into the lower parts of the earth?"

Paul also says in 1 Corinthians 12:23-24; For I received of the Lord that which I also delivered to you:that the Lord Jesus on the same night in which he was betrayed took bread: and when he had given thanks he broke it and said, "Take, eat this is my body which is broken for you:do this in remembrance of me."

One has to ask did he take bread in the sublunar realm and who was he talking to when he said it is broken for you?

This could hardly have been the demons of Doherty and Carrier's thesis and are we to suppose that there are some mysterious beings who are breaking bread in the sublunar zone in remembrance.

Carrier says Jesus is saying this to Paul in a vision and it's referring to the believers on earth in Paul's time who are the ones he gives the bread and wine.

But the passage is plainly saying that it was on the night he was betrayed he said this to his disciples and gave them the bread and wine. And the Christians in Paul's time are repeating this in remembrance as indicated.
More bad Carrier exegesis.

It's quite absurd of course to read it that way, but that what their thesis necessitates.

Now you can if you like, maintain that Paul believed there were wheat fields and vineyards and an entire populace of parallel humans up there, but clearly Paul is writing to Christians on earth about their doing this in remembrance.

In first Peter he refers to the stone that was laid in Zion and rejected by the builders which became the chief cornerstone.

Again it would be very strained to interpret this as the demons being the builders referred to here.
http://www.biblehub.com/1_peter/2-7.htm

And in 1 John referring to Christ, John uses language including "that which our hands have handled" which just goes way beyond hallucinations. http://www.biblehub.com/1_john/1-1.htm

So not just Paul but Peter and John also are speaking of an earthly material Christ, rejected by the builders who are the religious leaders in Israel.
All this aside from the other well known references to his humanity and genealogy. http://www.bede.org.uk/price7.htm

In Hebrews Jesus is of the tribe of Judah and the convoluted explanation by Doherty of his having a "Judaic nature" is a desperate measure to escape the obvious.

Carrier gives his own absurd explanation,that Paul and the apostles believed in a cosmic sperm bank in the sublunar realm where David's seed was stored!

I marvel at the acclamation of Carrier's work lavished on him by his supporters on his book's thread here.

We also have Carrier's strange use of Philo. In Zechariah Joshua the high priest is not in heaven but on earth and is obviously human not angelic. Furthermore Joshua is not himself the branch but another one is,who is said to be yet to come. And it's not even clear that Philo is referring to Joshua at all.

He talks about euhemerization and Islam. But Mohammed did not euhemerize Allah at all.


And on it goes. He has a conspiracy theory that the later mysterious writers of the gospels euhemerised the celestial apparition in order to "control doctrine."

So these are rejecting the original Celestial being believers accounts, and there isn't anyone around to say "That's not what Peter,John and Paul told us,or my dad or uncle!"

These same 'conspirators' accepted Paul's letters as authentic and apparently hadn't noticed that he,as we are told by Carrier, only wrote about a celestial being!

There is also the problem that Hebrews describes him as entering into heaven itself and sitting down on the right hand of the majesty on high. I don't see how this can be said to be the lower sublunar realm.

He makes a big deal about Christ's death and resurrection having already taken place in the sub-lunar realm before his first "appearance" to Peter and the others.

You guys supporting Carrier are just not engaging with the arguments I've twice already linked in this article.
https://scienceandotherdrugs.wordpress. ... ure-review?

Notice the argument from Hebrews on Christ's "appearances." Carrier thesis forces him to say that Christ's sacrifice comes before his appearances but Hebrews (their favourite book) says that his first appearance was to make this sacrifice! Hebrews 9:26-28

I'm just reposting this to provide a quick summary and reminder of just some of the problems with Carrier's thesis.

I've argued against his interpolation claim in Josephus on another thread and there are other problems also with his thesis which I've provided elsewhere on this thread.



Mon Feb 08, 2016 11:34 am
Profile Email
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 246 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 1, 5.00 on the average.Evaluations: 1, 5.00 on the average.Evaluations: 1, 5.00 on the average.Evaluations: 1, 5.00 on the average.Evaluations: 1, 5.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1 ... 13, 14, 15, 16, 17



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Site Resources 
HELPFUL INFO:
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!

IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

PROMOTE YOUR BOOK!
Advertise on BookTalk.org
How To Promote Your Book





BookTalk.org is a thriving book discussion forum, online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a community. Our forums are open to anyone in the world. While discussing books is our passion we also have active forums for talking about poetry, short stories, writing and authors. Our general discussion forum section includes forums for discussing science, religion, philosophy, politics, history, current events, arts, entertainment and more. We hope you join us!


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSOUR BOOKSAUTHOR INTERVIEWSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICYSITEMAP

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism Books

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2019. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank