• In total there are 29 users online :: 1 registered, 0 hidden and 28 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 789 on Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:08 am

Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?

A forum dedicated to friendly and civil conversations about domestic and global politics, history, and present-day events.
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.

All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
User avatar
Gnostic Bishop
Just realized BookTalk.org is awesome!
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:36 pm
9
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?

Unread post

Harry Marks wrote:[
quote="Gnostic Bishop"]Every law is thought control, a demand and compulsion for us to discriminate, on pain of punishment, against certain actions and people ideas.
No, obviously not. You can be put in jail for burglary or drunk driving because we want to protect citizens from those who take certain actions. You cannot be put in jail for thinking burglary is a good idea, or drunk driving. In the U.S., not for advocating them either. The point of thought control is to punish thoughts we don't like, explicitly distinct from behavior we don't like.
I will give you half mark on this because of my foolish inclusion of thoughts.

Otherwise, what I said was exact.
Gnostic Bishop wrote:You should want the good religions to dominate. You do want good religions to dominate. Right?
Not if by governmental power. If a religion cannot persuade on its own, it should be left to die. That is the American contribution to church/state relations, and I must say it has been good for both church and state to do things that way.
Really?
Even though our mainstream religions promote homophobia and misogyny?
Gnostic Bishop wrote:Or do you enjoy a sprinkling of evil religions?
Like something to gawk at on the internet? Well, it might have a good effect on people to be aware that there are snake-handlers and total chastity types out there. Help to keep people focused on the need for critical thinking, if you see what I mean.
[/quote]

Indeed. The more the loony religions are in our minds, the less growth will happen to religions.

Note how they are shrinking as we speak. That or are getting more moral as secular laws force them to think better.

Regards
DL
User avatar
geo

2C - MOD & GOLD
pets endangered by possible book avalanche
Posts: 4779
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
15
Location: NC
Has thanked: 2198 times
Been thanked: 2200 times
United States of America

Re: Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?

Unread post

The Skeptic's Guide to the Galaxy had a similar discussion a few years back. In that case, they were discussing a law in Philadelphia that makes the practice of fortunetelling illegal. I argued (by email) that such a law overreaches. People get their fortunes told for a variety of reasons. But more importantly if people want to believe in mumbo jumbo it's their right. In the case of fortune-telling, some people willingly suspend disbelief and in that sense it's a form of entertainment they are willing to pay for. You're getting into very dodgy territory when you invite the state to say what is and what isn't okay to believe.

My other point was along the lines of Harry Marks' caveat emptor. We live in a free country and people are free to make choices. Religions offer spiritual comfort to those who want spiritual comfort. Obviously it's a service with a hell of a lot of demand.

Obviously there are exceptions, as in the case of making promises that are clearly of a fraudulent nature, such as an attempt to bilk money from a gullible person. That crosses a line to be sure. But religion means different things to different people. I don't think it's very productive or fair to make a blanket statement that all religions are fraudulent.
-Geo
Question everything
User avatar
Harry Marks
Bookasaurus
Posts: 1920
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
12
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 2335 times
Been thanked: 1020 times
Ukraine

Re: Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?

Unread post

Gnostic Bishop wrote:I will give you half mark on this because of my foolish inclusion of thoughts.
Well, except that my point, to which you responded, was that your proposal smacks of thought control. I included thoughts, and you seemed, at first, to think it was a good idea.
Gnostic Bishop wrote:
Harry Marks wrote: That is the American contribution to church/state relations, and I must say it has been good for both church and state to do things that way.
Really?
Even though our mainstream religions promote homophobia and misogyny?
Umm, it sounds like you would compel them to stop taking the positions they do on issues. I do have trouble with that. Yes, I think it is good for the state to hold off on punishing people for unpopular views. Most views start out unpopular. And if we compelled society to agree with every thought that claimed the mantle of "progressive" our views would be bouncing around like the squirrel on caffeine in "Over the Hedge". Persuasion takes time, and attention, and engagement. And that's a good thing.

Do I think religion being out from under the state has been good for religion? Yes, of course. My wife and I have long been part of a denomination that rejected homophobia at least 35 years ago. Long before most of society. Ruled by the state, we would have been compelled to agree with the crowd or leave.

I'm not saying there is something to be proud of about conservative religion dragging its feet on social change. If not for evangelical Christianity, there would be no question of teaching anything but evolution in schools. What I am saying is that it warps religion horribly to take the instruments of violence in hand, as many Muslim sects do.
User avatar
DWill

1H - GOLD CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
16
Location: Luray, Virginia
Has thanked: 2262 times
Been thanked: 2470 times

Re: Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?

Unread post

Maybe I am just a little soft, but from time to time I get warm fuzzy feeling about religion and think about it being a part of my life again. The other day I passed by a church that appeared to be one of the "Bible-fearing" ones. The sign announcing the sermon read, "What Is Your Impact on Others?" I could not think of any other public venue at which people come together to hear about such an important topic. No doubt the preacher would illustrate his talk with Bible parables and quotations, but I don't imagine that an atheist would find them objectionable.

That is off-topic. I agree with geo and Harry that religion should be left alone. Under our Constitution it is speech that is protected.
User avatar
Gnostic Bishop
Just realized BookTalk.org is awesome!
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:36 pm
9
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?

Unread post

geo wrote:The Skeptic's Guide to the Galaxy had a similar discussion a few years back. In that case, they were discussing a law in Philadelphia that makes the practice of fortunetelling illegal. I argued (by email) that such a law overreaches. People get their fortunes told for a variety of reasons. But more importantly if people want to believe in mumbo jumbo it's their right. In the case of fortune-telling, some people willingly suspend disbelief and in that sense it's a form of entertainment they are willing to pay for. You're getting into very dodgy territory when you invite the state to say what is and what isn't okay to believe.

My other point was along the lines of Harry Marks' caveat emptor. We live in a free country and people are free to make choices. Religions offer spiritual comfort to those who want spiritual comfort. Obviously it's a service with a hell of a lot of demand.

Obviously there are exceptions, as in the case of making promises that are clearly of a fraudulent nature, such as an attempt to bilk money from a gullible person. That crosses a line to be sure. But religion means different things to different people. I don't think it's very productive or fair to make a blanket statement that all religions are fraudulent.
I did not state that all religions were fraudulent. Those that focus on knowledge and wisdom would likely get a pass as they do not need to lie to their adherents.

Basically, only those religions that are supernatural and fantasy based, with demonstrably immoral Gods would likely be asked to change their immoral dogma.

Yahweh, a genocidal son murdering God, would likely get a fail.

Regards
DL
User avatar
Gnostic Bishop
Just realized BookTalk.org is awesome!
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:36 pm
9
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?

Unread post

Harry Marks wrote:
Gnostic Bishop wrote:I will give you half mark on this because of my foolish inclusion of thoughts.
Well, except that my point, to which you responded, was that your proposal smacks of thought control. I included thoughts, and you seemed, at first, to think it was a good idea.
Gnostic Bishop wrote:
Harry Marks wrote: That is the American contribution to church/state relations, and I must say it has been good for both church and state to do things that way.
Really?
Even though our mainstream religions promote homophobia and misogyny?
Umm, it sounds like you would compel them to stop taking the positions they do on issues. I do have trouble with that. Yes, I think it is good for the state to hold off on punishing people for unpopular views. Most views start out unpopular. And if we compelled society to agree with every thought that claimed the mantle of "progressive" our views would be bouncing around like the squirrel on caffeine in "Over the Hedge". Persuasion takes time, and attention, and engagement. And that's a good thing.

Do I think religion being out from under the state has been good for religion? Yes, of course. My wife and I have long been part of a denomination that rejected homophobia at least 35 years ago. Long before most of society. Ruled by the state, we would have been compelled to agree with the crowd or leave.

I'm not saying there is something to be proud of about conservative religion dragging its feet on social change. If not for evangelical Christianity, there would be no question of teaching anything but evolution in schools. What I am saying is that it warps religion horribly to take the instruments of violence in hand, as many Muslim sects do.
Yet, in your own case, you seem to have forgiven Christianity for it's many Inquisitions and Holy Wars.

I have to wonder how you would feel if German's were as quick to forgive Hitler and maintain his policy thinking in a new and populous S.S. party.

If you forgive God's genocide, then you should not have a problem with Germans doing the same and venerating Hitler.

Thoughts?

Regards
DL
User avatar
Gnostic Bishop
Just realized BookTalk.org is awesome!
Posts: 790
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 12:36 pm
9
Has thanked: 92 times
Been thanked: 131 times

Re: Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?

Unread post

DWill wrote:Maybe I am just a little soft, but from time to time I get warm fuzzy feeling about religion and think about it being a part of my life again. The other day I passed by a church that appeared to be one of the "Bible-fearing" ones. The sign announcing the sermon read, "What Is Your Impact on Others?" I could not think of any other public venue at which people come together to hear about such an important topic. No doubt the preacher would illustrate his talk with Bible parables and quotations, but I don't imagine that an atheist would find them objectionable.

That is off-topic. I agree with geo and Harry that religion should be left alone. Under our Constitution it is speech that is protected.
Yes but hate speech directed towards gays and women who will not take their second class citizenship quietly is wrong and way too many of the mainstream religions do just that.

If women and gays cannot get hate speech out of churches then those churches should be closed for preaching unfounded hate.

I do not mind hate speech when there is a just cause for the hate, but that is not the case with gays and women.

Regards
DL
User avatar
Harry Marks
Bookasaurus
Posts: 1920
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
12
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 2335 times
Been thanked: 1020 times
Ukraine

Re: Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?

Unread post

Gnostic Bishop wrote:
Under_Taker wrote:All religion is dangerous be it fraud or not....
Since they have gifted us with 3,000 years of war, I agree.
Right, because we all know that wars need religion to happen. No one ever went to war to grab land, or oil, or slaves. Genghis Khan and Attila the Hun were such fanatics - without religion they would have been meek as a lamb.

And the way Catholic France intervened in the quintessential war of religion, the Thirty Years' War, shows how big religion is in warfare. Oh, yeah, they came in on the Protestant side. Well, there are always exceptions, I guess.
User avatar
Harry Marks
Bookasaurus
Posts: 1920
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
12
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 2335 times
Been thanked: 1020 times
Ukraine

Re: Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?

Unread post

Gnostic Bishop wrote: I did not state that all religions were fraudulent. Those that focus on knowledge and wisdom would likely get a pass as they do not need to lie to their adherents.
Yeah, like the people explaining that quantum mechanics now demonstrates that all is part of one big consciousness. Or the ones who will, for a few million, freeze your body til science figures out how to make you immortal and then will unfreeze it. Knowledge and wisdom - that's the ticket!
Gnostic Bishop wrote:Basically, only those religions that are supernatural and fantasy based, with demonstrably immoral Gods would likely be asked to change their immoral dogma.
I almost picked up on "supernatural", as if you know how to demonstrate that dogma is supernatural or fantasy-based, and then I did a double take on "demonstrably immoral". Pray tell, how you demonstrate the immorality of Jesus dying for atonement of sins?
User avatar
Harry Marks
Bookasaurus
Posts: 1920
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
12
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 2335 times
Been thanked: 1020 times
Ukraine

Re: Should Governments regulate fraudulent religions?

Unread post

Gnostic Bishop wrote:
Harry Marks wrote: What I am saying is that it warps religion horribly to take the instruments of violence in hand, as many Muslim sects do.
Yet, in your own case, you seem to have forgiven Christianity for it's many Inquisitions and Holy Wars.
Right. And you have forgiven Europe for the slave trade.

Where do you get these accusations? I just finished stating that the combination of religion and violence is toxic. I used an obvious current example, and you accuse me of not using the right example.
Post Reply

Return to “Current Events & History”