Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Nov 23, 2017 10:28 pm





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Ch. 9 - Battle of the Sexes 
Author Message
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Platinum Contributor

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 5868
Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 1507
Thanked: 1600 times in 1245 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
seespotrun2008 wrote:
I think that Robert's idea of "most fecund and long-lasting" is correct though. It seems like Dawkins is concerned with, not just that culture gets transmitted, but why. He gives the example of Auld Lang Syne. He talks about how people have held on to "for the sake of auld lang syne." This is not how it was written, however. It was written
"for auld lang syne". Dawkins asks what the "survival value" of this mistake was. Ultimately, this leads to asking what is the "survival value" of anything in our culture. Why do we hold on to certain things and not others? Dawkins asks the question about God, but we can also understand all of the ideas and values that make up patriarchy by asking that same question. Why do we hold onto certain values?

The 'why' is just what I find most lacking in this theory of memes. For me, memes beggar the question entirely. If an idea spreads, it must be because it is 'memetically' powerful, it is said. But why people have ended up expressing such ideas in the first place is the interesting and important part, and to explain this by simple 'spread' as with a virus is to me totally inadequate.

By the way, I don't know what to make of Dawkins example of 'Auld Lang Syne'. It must be a British phenomenon to add the words 'for the sake of' to the Robt. Burns song. I don't do this, and the two people I've asked don't either. So the practice spread in Britain but not, I'm guessing, in America. What is the reason? I have no idea, really, but why do regional and national differences of any kind exist? To say that it's because of memes does not, again, seem offer much real information.

DWill wrote:
It's one of the cruelties of life that women have to face this crisis of losing the attractiveness they had in the eyes of us shallow, visually-dominated men.

seespotrun wrote:
Actually, this may not be entirely true. There were some scientists at the Washington University School of Medicine who found that women actually respond very quickly to erotic images.


Well, thanks for putting in a good word (sort of) for my gender!



Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:31 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Graduate Student

Silver Contributor

Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 416
Location: Portland, OR
Thanks: 4
Thanked: 39 times in 32 posts
Gender: Female
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Quote:
The 'why' is just what I find most lacking in this theory of memes. For me, memes beggar the question entirely. If an idea spreads, it must be because it is 'memetically' powerful, it is said. But why people have ended up expressing such ideas in the first place is the interesting and important part, and to explain this by simple 'spread' as with a virus is to me totally inadequate.


I don't think that Dawkins thinks that it is simple either. Ideas, which he thinks of as memes, move from brain to brain but that does not mean everything sticks. I am not really sure where philosophy begins and science ends with memes though. I do not really have a problem with that, though. I think the idea of memes is useful for dissecting different cultural norms and trying to understand where they come from. It may be attractive to me, though, because it seems very feminist so I can relate to it. In the 30th anniversary edition that I have Dawkin’s has a footnote that a fellow scientist was trying to insult his theory by calling it philosophical. I do not totally understand why that is an insult.

Quote:
Well, thanks for putting in a good word (sort of) for my gender!


Sure. But more than just putting in a good word for men, it calls into question a value we cling to in our society. What would it do to the idea that women have to be beautiful if all human beings were stimulated visually by erotic imagery? Wow, women may be able to focus on something besides being beautiful!



Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:37 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:

BookTalk.org Newsletter 



Site Resources 
HELPFUL INFO:
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!

IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

PROMOTE YOUR BOOK!
Advertise on BookTalk.org
How To Promote Your Book

Featured Books

Books by New Authors


*

FACTS is a select group of active BookTalk.org members passionate about promoting Freethought, Atheism, Critical Thinking and Science.

Apply to join FACTS
See who else is in FACTS







BookTalk.org is a thriving book discussion forum, online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a community. Our forums are open to anyone in the world. While discussing books is our passion we also have active forums for talking about poetry, short stories, writing and authors. Our general discussion forum section includes forums for discussing science, religion, philosophy, politics, history, current events, arts, entertainment and more. We hope you join us!



Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2017. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank