Ch. 9: The Pleasure of Your Thoughts
Please use this thread for discussing Ch. 9: The Pleasure of Your Thoughts.
-
In total there are 6 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 6 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 871 on Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:00 am
Ch. 9: The Pleasure of Your Thoughts
- Chris OConnor
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 17024
- Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 2:43 pm
- 21
- Location: Florida
- Has thanked: 3513 times
- Been thanked: 1309 times
- Gender:
- Contact:
-
-
Masters
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2005 12:28 am
- 18
- Location: Sunnyvale, CA
- Has thanked: 5 times
- Been thanked: 41 times
I enjoyed this chapter about the pleasure of thought. People take pleasure from certain kinds of thinking because doing do provides selective pressure to think that way, from the perspective of evolutionary biology. Since people enjoy figuring things out, they're more inclined to spend time doing so, even though the payoff for doing so is longer term.
The juxtaposition at the end of the chapter was particularly sweet.
The juxtaposition at the end of the chapter was particularly sweet.
The feeling of knowing, the reward for both proven and unproven thoughts, is learning's best friend, and mental flexibility's worst enemy.
- DWill
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 6966
- Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
- 16
- Location: Luray, Virginia
- Has thanked: 2262 times
- Been thanked: 2470 times
In this chapter, Burton tries to get us over the hump of applying the feeling of knowing to situations in which we have to delay our final gratification. What's to keep us interested and motivated in a long project, where we seem not to be getting much from the brain's reward system? Burton tells us that if we are to persist, we need to have
some reward, because nobody can just grind away forever without feeling some inspiration. He theorizes that the feeling of knowing that operates to give us momentary rewards adapts itself to dole out to us rewards for our diligence, but it seems to be of a more subtle type. He calls it an "unwarranted feeling of knowing," I guess because you don't have the evidence yet to know you're right, but you're still getting the small hits of knowing that keep you moving forward. As you do so, you might become conditioned by these rewards to persist on your track even if contrary new evidence starts to come up. And this is why the feeling of knowing is necessary but can also be a hindrance to mental flexibility.
Burton, though, holds out the possibility that this flexibility problem is avoidable or at least can be lessened. He wonders whether our education system rewards students too much for finding the one right answer that the teacher is looking for, rather than encouraging them to find satisfaction in the process of explorative learning, not feeling so strange to be in uncertainty. On the other hand, he implies that genetic differences may have a lot to do with the degree to which we
need a strong feeling of knowing (vs. being able to live with uncertainty), so this leads to a more deterministic view.
Burton sometimes seems to assume I am smart enough to connect his dots, but this is not always the case! I wish he would be more explicit at times. I still don't get how his example of crossing the street in NYC follows from abstract thought needing a "cheerleader."
DWill
some reward, because nobody can just grind away forever without feeling some inspiration. He theorizes that the feeling of knowing that operates to give us momentary rewards adapts itself to dole out to us rewards for our diligence, but it seems to be of a more subtle type. He calls it an "unwarranted feeling of knowing," I guess because you don't have the evidence yet to know you're right, but you're still getting the small hits of knowing that keep you moving forward. As you do so, you might become conditioned by these rewards to persist on your track even if contrary new evidence starts to come up. And this is why the feeling of knowing is necessary but can also be a hindrance to mental flexibility.
Burton, though, holds out the possibility that this flexibility problem is avoidable or at least can be lessened. He wonders whether our education system rewards students too much for finding the one right answer that the teacher is looking for, rather than encouraging them to find satisfaction in the process of explorative learning, not feeling so strange to be in uncertainty. On the other hand, he implies that genetic differences may have a lot to do with the degree to which we
need a strong feeling of knowing (vs. being able to live with uncertainty), so this leads to a more deterministic view.
Burton sometimes seems to assume I am smart enough to connect his dots, but this is not always the case! I wish he would be more explicit at times. I still don't get how his example of crossing the street in NYC follows from abstract thought needing a "cheerleader."
DWill