• In total there are 56 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 56 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 871 on Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:00 am

173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates

A forum dedicated to friendly and civil conversations about domestic and global politics, history, and present-day events.
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.

All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
User avatar
Harry Marks
Bookasaurus
Posts: 1922
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
12
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 2337 times
Been thanked: 1022 times
Ukraine

Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates

Unread post

ant wrote:So Pelosi doesn't want (or doesn't think) Biden should debate prior to election?

What a surprise! How unpredictable this was!!
Sounds like a great way to lower expectations. Worked once, why not go for it again?
User avatar
ant

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 5935
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
12
Has thanked: 1371 times
Been thanked: 969 times

Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates

Unread post

Will NOT be voting for a candidate that did not openly condemn the violence that has hijacked peaceful lawful protests and is a threat to freedom of speech while on their biggest stage this past week

Will NOT ignore his party also will not openly condemn the violence

Will NOT be part of the "party of the people" and their blatant hypocicy


Will not SUPPORT a party that believes their elected candidate does not have to debate openly.


Will not vote for a coward hiding in his basement.


My vote will go elsewhere

The American people deserve better than Joe Biden
Last edited by ant on Fri Aug 28, 2020 11:44 am, edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
geo

2C - MOD & GOLD
pets endangered by possible book avalanche
Posts: 4780
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
15
Location: NC
Has thanked: 2198 times
Been thanked: 2201 times
United States of America

Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates

Unread post

ant wrote:So Pelosi doesn't want (or doesn't think) Biden should debate prior to election?
Hmm, I suspect Pelosi is being crafty here. But no matter, Joe Biden says he will definitely debate Trump. He'll need fact-checkers on stage to address the current president's difficulties with the truth.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administra ... si-remarks
-Geo
Question everything
KindaSkolarly

1E - BANNED
Doctorate
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 3:53 pm
7
Location: Texas
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates

Unread post

Image
User avatar
ant

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 5935
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
12
Has thanked: 1371 times
Been thanked: 969 times

Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates

Unread post

Sorry, guys, but this isn't simply stuttering or just another gaf.
This is cognitive decline.
I know it's desperate times for many people, but it is time to admit it.
I wont think any less of you if you do.


https://youtu.be/X1byHpkSmYc
Last edited by ant on Tue Sep 01, 2020 11:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ant

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 5935
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
12
Has thanked: 1371 times
Been thanked: 969 times

Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates

Unread post

The NYT has become a near full blown propaganda outlet:


As right-wing groups increasingly move to confront unrest in cities, clashes are breaking out between demonstrators with starkly different views on how to keep cities safe.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/09/01/us/p ... ashes.html


How many closet commies marinate themselves in this cheap propaganda?

Who would have thought all these fiery but otherwise peaceful protests media outlets like the insane people over at CNN defend consist of people who care about the safety of their cities?


https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video ... round.html


The left is shameless
KindaSkolarly

1E - BANNED
Doctorate
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 3:53 pm
7
Location: Texas
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates

Unread post

A while back Joe Biden said the military would remove Trump from the White House.

Biden 'absolutely convinced' military would escort Trump from White House if he loses and refuses to leave
cnn.com/2020/06/11/politics/joe-biden-d ... index.html

Fortunately, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff said a couple of days ago that the military won't play a part in the election.

duckduckgo.com/?t=ffnt&q=chairman+j ... amp;ia=web

At least the military appears to be out of it now.

And the Dems aren't having much success blaming the Wuhan virus situation on Trump. People know the score on that one.

Image
User avatar
DWill

1H - GOLD CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
16
Location: Luray, Virginia
Has thanked: 2262 times
Been thanked: 2470 times

Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates

Unread post

Biden should have known better than to say the military would intervene. I've heard the Secret Service would usher Trump out if he refuses to leave. Some authority would have to, that's clear, in the unlikely event that Trump won't go. Someone said the odds are high that Trump will be an ungracious loser, but low that he will not budge. I agree that's the way it will play out if he loses decisively enough, but if he loses by a hair, then all bets are off.

Tradition states that the vacating president leaves a letter on the Resolute Desk beginning, "Dear Mr. President." If Trump respects that custom, I have to say I'd be rather proud of him.
User avatar
Harry Marks
Bookasaurus
Posts: 1922
Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
12
Location: Denver, CO
Has thanked: 2337 times
Been thanked: 1022 times
Ukraine

Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates

Unread post

He didn't intend to win in the first place. What a dilemma - prop up your ego by refusing to leave, vs. step down and enjoy a chance to relax and not have 40 million people hating on you. Except that he sort of blew that one already.
KindaSkolarly

1E - BANNED
Doctorate
Posts: 512
Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2017 3:53 pm
7
Location: Texas
Has thanked: 16 times
Been thanked: 104 times

Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates

Unread post

A couple of short videos:

The Joe Biden They Are Hiding From You
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qOradie8WzI

VIDEO: Joe Biden Tells Crowd That His Head Was Cut Off
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3zpvu9La5A

The Republicans have stopped spending for Trump TV ads. It looks as if they plan to use their money elsewhere. So Biden will own the dinosaur TV waves between now and the election.

But the Democrats have already conceded that Trump will win. Black support for Trump is double what it was in the last election. Suburbia is swinging to Trump because the Democratic mobs in the cities are threatening to expand the riots. At this point, 60 days out, it looks like a landslide for Trump.

The Dems know this but say that the victory will be a "red mirage."

duckduckgo.com/?t=ffnt&q=red+mirage ... amp;ia=web

The official Dem script now reads, "Trump will APPEAR to win on election night, but a week later, after the mail-in votes are counted, Biden will win." This is why Hillary Clinton (enabler of rapist Bill Clinton and rapist Joe Biden) has said that Biden must not concede under any circumstances. Also, note how the Dems claim that the Reps are sending hordes of attorneys out to interfere with the mail-in vote counting. This is typical Saul Alinsky / DNC misdirection. It's the DEMOCRATS that are lawyering up. The mail-in vote fraud is their baby, their last line of defense.

We're going to see heavy interference on social media on election night. Twitter said it would not allow Trump to declare victory. Should be a very interesting night.

Leftist rags have floated the idea that Speaker of the House Nancy Lugosi would become "interim president" if the vote count isn't completed by January 20. But attempting this kind of coup would be foolish. The US Constitution outlines ways to deal with the issue, and then there's the Supreme Court. We saw the court step in with Gore v Bush, and that could happen again. This would probably be the Dems' best bet, as the court is not as "conservative" as is claimed.
Post Reply

Return to “Current Events & History”