Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Aug 13, 2020 9:55 pm





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Orwellian liberalism 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Nutty for Books


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1581
Thanks: 1763
Thanked: 789 times in 635 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
ant wrote:
Of course the unchecked mayhem and violence in democratic run cities is the fault of the republicans.

It's easy to blame the right for the horrible systems facing people of color. The anti-government instincts on the right, and the assumption that institutions are treating people fairly (connected strongly to white fragility), and the compounding effects of implicit bias, are part of a system enabled by the denial and pretense on the right. The dog-whistle appeals to racism, which would never have been acceptable to the Republican party before Nixon's Southern Strategy, and the natural authoritarianism that put wind in the "law and order" sails, all make the Republican party from Reagan on look like the villains of the piece, because they have accepted that role and walked hand in hand with Fox News and Rush Limbaugh playing many of the same games.

But as I think about what would really make a difference, it looks to me like the requirement is courage that the Democrats don't really have much more of. Two states have made serious efforts to integrate housing: New Jersey and Hawaii. In New Jersey's case it was driven by the courts. The country still has a pitiful record of facing up to the legacy of our racist past by simply putting affordable housing in every single suburb (looking at you, Westchester County and Marin County and Hamptons) and showing zero tolerance for intolerance. Follow up is necessary - jobs and fitting in and learning to be respectable rather than just fighting to be treated with respect are all barriers that need some assistance to get past. Human relationship is essential to helping people make those transitions. But until housing is desegregated, those personal kinds of assistance can never happen.

But instead of actually taking courage, we point fingers at the Republicans, (who are, in fact, guilty of riding the racism current,) even though the Democrats were, up until Trump, mainly doing better only in the sense that they said the right things. Now we have a President and a party pushing judicial activism to reinforce racism, and who regularly back harmful policies, so the situation is rather different. But it is still true that the real sources of our society's gross racial inequality are going unaddressed and almost unmentioned.

I wonder if a candidate like Kamala Harris, willing to let it be personal on the vulnerable side, might be what it takes.



The following user would like to thank Harry Marks for this post:
DWill
Thu Jun 25, 2020 10:20 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5842
Thanks: 1366
Thanked: 956 times in 822 posts
Gender: None specified
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
Should museums be abolished?

CNN claims "people" are "calling for it" to happen.

https://www.cnn.com/style/article/natur ... index.html

(propaganda outlet)



Reminder about the perniciousness of f so called liberalism and those who are silent and complicit in all this.


Quote:
“Perhaps the Party was rotten under the surface, its cult of strenuousness and self-denial simply a sham concealing iniquity.”


Quote:
Some ideas are so stupid that only intellectuals believe them


Quote:
“You will be hollow. We shall squeeze you empty, and then we shall fill you with ourselves.”


~ George Orwell



Sat Jun 27, 2020 10:44 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5842
Thanks: 1366
Thanked: 956 times in 822 posts
Gender: None specified
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
Why on earth would a statue of Fredrick Douglass be torn down?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/ ... -attacked/


This is turning into straight up Marxism.



Mon Jul 06, 2020 12:14 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Platinum Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6648
Location: Luray, Virginia
Thanks: 2011
Thanked: 2233 times in 1691 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
It's not known who tore it down. The Arthur Ashe statue in Richmond was vandalized by the opposition to BLM. This could be tit for tat.



Mon Jul 06, 2020 8:24 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5842
Thanks: 1366
Thanked: 956 times in 822 posts
Gender: None specified
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
traffic signals are racist


.
Quote:
“Remember, honey,” she said to her daughter as we waited for the light to turn green, “we need to wait for the little White man to appear before we can cross the street.”


https://level.medium.com/the-unintentio ... 899c34fefb



Wed Jul 08, 2020 12:47 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5842
Thanks: 1366
Thanked: 956 times in 822 posts
Gender: None specified
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
DWill wrote:
It's not known who tore it down. The Arthur Ashe statue in Richmond was vandalized by the opposition to BLM. This could be tit for tat.



Right..



Wed Jul 08, 2020 2:56 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Platinum Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6648
Location: Luray, Virginia
Thanks: 2011
Thanked: 2233 times in 1691 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
ant wrote:
traffic signals are racist


.
Quote:
“Remember, honey,” she said to her daughter as we waited for the light to turn green, “we need to wait for the little White man to appear before we can cross the street.”


https://level.medium.com/the-unintentio ... 899c34fefb

An example of over-analysis, but I wouldn't call it Orwellian.



Wed Jul 08, 2020 7:53 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Nutty for Books


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1581
Thanks: 1763
Thanked: 789 times in 635 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
ant wrote:
Democrats need to be held accountable.

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/07/us/b ... sters.html
So presumably Republicans need to be held accountable for these murderous, terrorist car attacks on protesters. I think I am beginning to catch on to how this "accountability" works.



Thu Jul 09, 2020 4:28 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Nutty for Books


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1581
Thanks: 1763
Thanked: 789 times in 635 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
There was an interesting op-ed in the New York Times recently about the police accountability issue. Essentially, Bret Stephens (one of the conservatives in their commentator ranks) argues that the surge in violent crime in Baltimore and a few other cities has been due to police "holding back" on account of fear of being held responsible. I don't think he has a solid basis for concluding this, but there seems to be some suspicious sequencing.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/opin ... imore.html
The main problem is that similar surges have occurred without any policing changes or reasons for police to be intimidated, and other cities have had success (meaning, lower crime) with less confrontational policing. I suspect there are actually multiple causes at work - for instance, Baltimore has had a real hollowing out of working-class jobs, as anyone who watched The Wire knows. Stephens downplays this factor, but I find his argument less than comprehensive or convincing.

The takeaway is supposed to be that bad guys get out of hand when the police back off of aggressive policing. The main problem is that these shootings don't seem to be coordinated efforts by bad guys to take over territory, make more money or dominate night clubs. Rather (from the sketchy reporting I have read, anyway) it has been about an upsurge in random violence, with punks getting their hands on guns and swaggering around until somebody provokes them (probably another punk with a gun). If police are really backing off, that could still be a result. But it could just be caused by the things Stephens doesn't want to credit: unemployment, chaotic homes, and cultures of desperation.

In general, I think it is a bad idea to try to account for such trends with either just liberal or just conservative narratives. The decline in crime over the 90s seems to have been a virtuous circle driven by improved economies, declining share of young males in the population, aggressive policing, tough sentencing (now being questioned for its toxic societal effects) and, of all things, Roe v. Wade. (Fewer unwanted children of chaos really does mean lower crime rates.)



The following user would like to thank Harry Marks for this post:
DWill, geo
Sat Jul 18, 2020 6:25 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Nutty for Books


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1581
Thanks: 1763
Thanked: 789 times in 635 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
Now it seems that the looting in Minneapolis was kicked off by a false flag operation, specifically a Hell's Angels white supremacist being referred to as "Umbrella Man".

https://www.startribune.com/police-umbr ... 571932272/

Hard to know who to be mad at.



Fri Jul 31, 2020 3:44 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5842
Thanks: 1366
Thanked: 956 times in 822 posts
Gender: None specified
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
Harry Marks wrote:
Now it seems that the looting in Minneapolis was kicked off by a false flag operation, specifically a Hell's Angels white supremacist being referred to as "Umbrella Man".

https://www.startribune.com/police-umbr ... 571932272/

Hard to know who to be mad at.



There is no evidence to speak of for that claim



Sat Aug 01, 2020 12:15 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Nutty for Books


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1581
Thanks: 1763
Thanked: 789 times in 635 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
ant wrote:
There is no evidence to speak of for that claim

No, there is evidence, but we are not hearing much of it yet. There is reason to be suspicious of the “tip” that led to Umbrella Man, but I am betting the evidence against him holds up better than the arrests of “antifa thugs” in Portland. Why? Because so many peaceful demonstrators tried to stop this kind of trashing, and a provocateur from one of the right wing terrorist groups has more incentive to ignore those pleas than the leftists who want to be considered virtuous for their anarchic violence.



Sat Aug 01, 2020 9:57 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5842
Thanks: 1366
Thanked: 956 times in 822 posts
Gender: None specified
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
Harry Marks wrote:
ant wrote:
There is no evidence to speak of for that claim

No, there is evidence, but we are not hearing much of it yet. There is reason to be suspicious of the “tip” that led to Umbrella Man, but I am betting the evidence against him holds up better than the arrests of “antifa thugs” in Portland. Why? Because so many peaceful demonstrators tried to stop this kind of trashing, and a provocateur from one of the right wing terrorist groups has more incentive to ignore those pleas than the leftists who want to be considered virtuous for their anarchic violence.


So not hearing evidence is in fact evidence.

Gotcha



Sun Aug 02, 2020 12:08 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Nutty for Books


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1581
Thanks: 1763
Thanked: 789 times in 635 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
ant wrote:
There is no evidence to speak of for that claim

Harry Marks wrote:
No, there is evidence, but we are not hearing much of it yet.

ant wrote:
So not hearing evidence is in fact evidence.Gotcha

Sorry, I thought you requested no citations from the internet. There is plenty of evidence, but it isn't, as far as I can tell, conclusive.
https://www.foxnews.com/us/minneapolis- ... els-police
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/umbrella-m ... e-protests
https://nypost.com/2020/07/28/minneapol ... cist-cops/
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/28/us/u ... polis.html
https://www.cnn.com/2020/07/28/us/umbre ... index.html
https://www.rawstory.com/2020/07/umbrel ... ng-member/



Sun Aug 02, 2020 12:42 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5842
Thanks: 1366
Thanked: 956 times in 822 posts
Gender: None specified
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Orwellian liberalism
Where can I read about the specific evidence that determines he is an "associate" of an Aryan biker gang?

The accusation is based on an "anonymous tip".
That good enough for you?



Sun Aug 02, 2020 12:58 pm
Profile Email
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 76 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:

Announcements 

• Promote Your FICTION Book on BookTalk.org
Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:33 pm

• Promote Your NON-FICTION Book on BookTalk.org
Sun Jul 30, 2017 7:18 pm



Site Resources 
HELPFUL INFO:
Community Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Author Interview Transcripts
Book Discussion Leaders

IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Coming Soon!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Coming Soon!

PROMOTE YOUR BOOK!
Advertise on BookTalk.org
Promote your FICTION book
Promote your NON-FICTION book





BookTalk.org is a thriving book discussion forum, online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a community. Our forums are open to anyone in the world. While discussing books is our passion we also have active forums for talking about poetry, short stories, writing and authors. Our general discussion forum section includes forums for discussing science, religion, philosophy, politics, history, current events, arts, entertainment and more. We hope you join us!


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSOUR BOOKSAUTHOR INTERVIEWSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICYSITEMAP

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism Books

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2019. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank