(emphasis added)As with all forms of voter fraud, documented instances of fraud related to VBM are rare. However, even many scholars who argue that fraud is generally rare agree that fraud with VBM voting seems to be more frequent than with in-person voting.
https://electionlab.mit.edu/research/vo ... tee-voting
So a question might be why is this concern so often quashed with "although it's rare", when it is admitted that it is still more frequent than with in-person voting?
Why is an opportunity given for one thing to become more frequent when it is harder to become a frequent occurrence when done one particular way?