• In total there are 2 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 2 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 616 on Thu Jan 18, 2024 7:47 pm

Ch. 2: The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail

#169: Dec. - Mar. 2020 & #109: Jul. - Sept. 2012 (Non-Fiction)
User avatar
Chris OConnor

1A - OWNER
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 17016
Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 2:43 pm
21
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 3507 times
Been thanked: 1310 times
Gender:
Contact:
United States of America

Ch. 2: The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail

Unread post

Ch. 2: The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail
User avatar
Dexter

1F - BRONZE CONTRIBUTOR
I dumpster dive for books!
Posts: 1787
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 3:14 pm
13
Has thanked: 144 times
Been thanked: 712 times
United States of America

Re: Ch. 2: The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail

Unread post

I still struggle a bit with Hume's statement that reason is and ought to be the servant of the passions. (I need to read some Hume.) It seems that he anticipated Damasio's research that is mentioned, that "gut feelings and bodily reactions were necessary to think rationally," and without it people have a hard time making decisions. I wonder if that is essentially what Hume had in mind, without having much knowledge of the brain.

But aside from the necessity based on how are brains are wired to use emotions in this way, I wonder how much we ought to try to bring in reason more. Surely we don't want to entirely base our morality on our "gut" and Haidt is not suggesting we should? Does a gut reaction in itself give us a reason to doubt our reason if it's in conflict? Is it because we're just not very good at moral reasoning?
User avatar
geo

2C - MOD & GOLD
pets endangered by possible book avalanche
Posts: 4779
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
15
Location: NC
Has thanked: 2199 times
Been thanked: 2200 times
United States of America

Re: Ch. 2: The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail

Unread post

Dexter wrote:I still struggle a bit with Hume's statement that reason is and ought to be the servant of the passions. (I need to read some Hume.) It seems that he anticipated Damasio's research that is mentioned, that "gut feelings and bodily reactions were necessary to think rationally," and without it people have a hard time making decisions. I wonder if that is essentially what Hume had in mind, without having much knowledge of the brain.

But aside from the necessity based on how are brains are wired to use emotions in this way, I wonder how much we ought to try to bring in reason more. Surely we don't want to entirely base our morality on our "gut" and Haidt is not suggesting we should? Does a gut reaction in itself give us a reason to doubt our reason if it's in conflict? Is it because we're just not very good at moral reasoning?
Maybe Hume intuitively understood that we make snap judgments based on emotion—before reason can kick in. And to pretend that reason rules the day is delusion. Maybe that's where the "ought" comes in. We ought not pretend that we are purely rational beings.

Indeed, here's a more complete version of the same quote:

"Reason is, and ought only to be the slave of the passions, and can never pretend to any other office than to serve and obey them."

But it would be better to get it straight from the horse's mouth. This is Hume's Treatise on Human Nature.

I think Haidt will say that reason can sway the elephant at least in some circumstances.
-Geo
Question everything
User avatar
ant

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 5935
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
12
Has thanked: 1371 times
Been thanked: 969 times

Re: Ch. 2: The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail

Unread post

Hi everyone... Happy New Year.

The only Haidt book I've read is The Happiness Hypothesis.

Checking in on this discussion.. pretty interesting.
User avatar
geo

2C - MOD & GOLD
pets endangered by possible book avalanche
Posts: 4779
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
15
Location: NC
Has thanked: 2199 times
Been thanked: 2200 times
United States of America

Re: Ch. 2: The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail

Unread post

ant wrote:Hi everyone... Happy New Year.

The only Haidt book I've read is The Happiness Hypothesis.

Checking in on this discussion.. pretty interesting.
Welcome back! Check out the Wizard and Prophet discussion too. I read the first two chapters and it really is excellent!
-Geo
Question everything
User avatar
DWill

1H - GOLD CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
16
Location: Luray, Virginia
Has thanked: 2262 times
Been thanked: 2470 times

Re: Ch. 2: The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail

Unread post

geo wrote:
ant wrote:Hi everyone... Happy New Year.

The only Haidt book I've read is The Happiness Hypothesis.

Checking in on this discussion.. pretty interesting.
Welcome back! Check out the Wizard and Prophet discussion too. I read the first two chapters and it really is excellent!
Yeah, jump in and answer Dexter's question, because I can't!

I don't think I quite finished Happiness Hypothesis, but this book is a continuation of that one's ideas, applied to our politics.
User avatar
DWill

1H - GOLD CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
16
Location: Luray, Virginia
Has thanked: 2262 times
Been thanked: 2470 times

Re: Ch. 2: The Intuitive Dog and Its Rational Tail

Unread post

Perhaps the "ought" in Hume's judgment of the subordinate position of reason can be understood better by Haidt's substitution of "only fit to be" (49). Another Hume quotation JH cites also might clarify the "ought." "And as reasoning is not the source, whence either disputant drives his tenets; it is in vain to expect, that any logic, which speaks not to the affections, will ever engage him to embrace sounder principles" (48). The quotation also indicates that here Hume is using "logic" as equivalent to "reasoning." That's the way I think of reasoning, too, although I have the impression that in Hume's time "reason" (contrasted with the mental action of reasoning) was a very broad faculty not restricted to logic and empirical fact. In this instance, however, Hume's use of "reasoning" appears aligned with Haidt's "moral reasoning," that is, the verbal explanation we offer for our intuitively based conclusion.

Hume's words "tenets"and "principles" also helps me understand that he's talking about just the kind of thing that JH is, our stances on various important (read moral) questions.

There's a lot else I have to digest in the chapter. I'm not sure I really did the first time I read the book.
Post Reply

Return to “The Righteous Mind - by Jonathan Haidt”