Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Dec 13, 2017 3:42 pm





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
You should thank me for The Orville but it is doomed. 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Diamond Contributor

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4898
Location: Florida
Thanks: 177
Thanked: 344 times in 294 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post You should thank me for The Orville but it is doomed.
I was 11 years old on September 8th 1966 and I remember that date because of a television show I saw premier that night. The show was Star Trek and as far as I know that is the only television premier for which I remember where I was when I saw it. I was a fan and watched Star Trek 'religiously'. One day I heard that NBC* was not going to renew Star Trek for a third season. In a panic, I wrote a letter imploring NBC not to cancel Star Trek. I was not the only one who wrote a letter. In the days before social media campaigns, enough people felt as I did that NBC decided to renew ST. ST did return for a third season, but NBC scheduled it in a very bad time slot and ST's run ended after the third season.

So, what does that have to do with the program The Orville? If ST had not returned for season 3, there would not have been enough episodes to make ST economically viable for syndication and it was in syndication that if built its following.

I was not thrilled with all of the Star Trek products. I liked the original show. I watched the animated series for want of anything else. I rejoiced when the moving came out and I liked ST The Next Generation. I was and am not a fan of Star Trek Enterprise, Deep Space Nine, Voyager or any others I have not mentioned and though I liked the ST shows I have listed, I did NOT like the episodes where the audience was being preached at, and that is the problem with The Orville. The Orville had some promise, but it has shown itself to be not only highly preachy, but plagiaristic and and WRONG.

A recent episode, If The Stars Should Appear (ITSSA), was essentially a rip-off of the 8th episode of the 3rd season of the original Star Trek. The episonde was titled, For the World is Hollow and I Have Touched the Sky. The problem with ITSSA is that the episode insists on a side story about the autocratic religious leaders who brutally kill anyone who contradicts the "scriptures" which claim there are no other worlds. This is clearly a hit on Christianity. The writers and produces of TO should have done their homework. I refer them to Medieval Cosmology: Theories of Infinity, Place, Time, Void, and the Plurality of Worlds by Pierre Duhem amazon.com/Medieval-Cosmology-Theories- ... +cosmologh.

It would be tolerable if TO occasionally deviated into an overly didactic mode but it appears to be an underlying reason for the show's existence, and they get it wrong to boot.

I suppose that had I not written that letter, 50 years ago, ST would not have made it to syndication, and TO would not exist. I suspect that the appetite for TO will be very small and the show will vanish, unless they stop the stupid programming.

*Trivia note: There were only 3 networks in those days, NBC, CBS and the newest addition, ABC


_________________
n=Infinity
Sum n = -1/12
n=1

where n are natural numbers.


Wed Oct 04, 2017 11:54 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Intern


Joined: Nov 2015
Posts: 164
Location: Tarrytown, NY
Thanks: 15
Thanked: 70 times in 58 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)
Highscores: 5

Post Re: You should thank me for The Orville but it is doomed.
Sadly, Star Trek's third season was mostly bad.



Thu Oct 12, 2017 3:27 pm
Profile Email
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:

BookTalk.org Newsletter 



Site Resources 
HELPFUL INFO:
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!

IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

PROMOTE YOUR BOOK!
Advertise on BookTalk.org
How To Promote Your Book

Featured Books

Books by New Authors


*

FACTS is a select group of active BookTalk.org members passionate about promoting Freethought, Atheism, Critical Thinking and Science.

Apply to join FACTS
See who else is in FACTS







BookTalk.org is a thriving book discussion forum, online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a community. Our forums are open to anyone in the world. While discussing books is our passion we also have active forums for talking about poetry, short stories, writing and authors. Our general discussion forum section includes forums for discussing science, religion, philosophy, politics, history, current events, arts, entertainment and more. We hope you join us!



Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2017. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank