http://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/nas ... han-losses
What the sheet is going on?
-
In total there are 54 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 54 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 871 on Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:00 am
NASA: Mass ice sheet gains are greater than losses.
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
- ant
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
- 12
- Has thanked: 1371 times
- Been thanked: 969 times
- Harry Marks
-
Bookasaurus
- Posts: 1922
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2011 10:42 am
- 12
- Location: Denver, CO
- Has thanked: 2337 times
- Been thanked: 1022 times
Re: NASA: Mass ice sheet gains are greater than losses.
Interesting finding. I would say it means a couple of things.
1. Something is going on that our models are not rich enough to capture yet. Probably this has to do with the increased pace of the hydrological cycle, as warmer water circulates toward the poles in greater amounts and evaporation in the area of Antarctica therefore increases, leading to greater precipitation. The more intense hydrological cycle has been noted in other contexts.
2. This sort of finding should lay to rest forever the notion that there is some conspiracy among climatologists so that only scary findings may be supported or published.
1. Something is going on that our models are not rich enough to capture yet. Probably this has to do with the increased pace of the hydrological cycle, as warmer water circulates toward the poles in greater amounts and evaporation in the area of Antarctica therefore increases, leading to greater precipitation. The more intense hydrological cycle has been noted in other contexts.
2. This sort of finding should lay to rest forever the notion that there is some conspiracy among climatologists so that only scary findings may be supported or published.
- geo
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
- 15
- Location: NC
- Has thanked: 2198 times
- Been thanked: 2201 times
Re: NASA: Mass ice sheet gains are greater than losses.
Science is going on. Observation, collecting evidence, asking questions, forming hypotheses. Above all, keeping an open mind.
-Geo
Question everything
Question everything
- Taylor
-
- Awesome
- Posts: 962
- Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 7:39 pm
- 14
- Location: Florida
- Has thanked: 423 times
- Been thanked: 591 times
Re: NASA: Mass ice sheet gains are greater than losses.
I'm just responding from memory, If I recall correctly, the 2015 IPCC report accounts for at a minimum, a 2 percent increase in permanent ice through out the southern hemisphere, where as the linked article sites the 2013 IPCC report.
The southern hemisphere is dominated by water, also the south pole is a land mass, for these two reasons the are constants that can account for increases of permanent ice increases.
Ants same link also has a NASA study that shows the decreasing area of permanent ice at the north pole, which has no land mass, and is subject to prevailing weather conditions and rising ocean temps.
The southern hemisphere is dominated by water, also the south pole is a land mass, for these two reasons the are constants that can account for increases of permanent ice increases.
Ants same link also has a NASA study that shows the decreasing area of permanent ice at the north pole, which has no land mass, and is subject to prevailing weather conditions and rising ocean temps.