You deregulate and phase things out overtime, not overnight.Interbane wrote:Well, we haven't had such a system wholesale, but we have in pieces. Financial regulation for example. We took it away and the world exploded. If we switched in every way to full-scale LF, I doubt we could recover.
I have already looked at Libertarianism, libertarisnism. I do not need to again.Interbane wrote: MrA, you should look to Libertarianism or something a bit closer to reality.
It does not violate individual rights, niether does laissez-faire capitalism.Interbane wrote:Objectivism violates many 'rights'.
That is not a right. When you do issue that, you violate potential employees that are willing to work fora certain amount, and employers for hiring at a certain amount. Any governmental interference in that, violates individual rights, in laissez-faire capitalism.Interbane wrote: The right for fair and equitable pay.
The banks in laissez-faire capitalism are not controlled by governmetnal regulations, and no one is forced to deal with them.Interbane wrote:The right not to be nickel and dimed by big banks.
That is not a right. Don't buy the car if it doesn't satisfy standards you have for when it crashes. Forcing a business to comply to such standards violates their rights.Interbane wrote: The right for a car to have certain minimum standards when it crashes.
All individuals, no matter race, gender, whatever, pay is determined by employer. That is theirs to do by right. If anyone has a problem with the amount of pay, don't work for them.Interbane wrote: The right for a woman to be paid the same as a man if she is equally qualified.
You cannot use governmental force to make a business hire people they do not want to hire. It's against their right to deal with, and employ whoever they want to.Interbane wrote: The right to employment without religious descrimination.
They can draw up what they want to in the loan, if you do not want to agree to the terms, seek a loan elsewhere, otherwise, governmetnal intervention into such matters, would violate the rights of the lender.Interbane wrote: The right to take out loans that aren't tricked up with volatile fine print.
So laissez-faire recognizes upholds and protects individual rights, it does not violate them, as your system surely does.
You have failed to support that claim.Interbane wrote:Objectivism is tyranny.
No, individual rights, as such.Interbane wrote:You protect the "rights" of the upper class,
Perhaps, individual rights, as such, is a fairy tale to you, but not to me.Interbane wrote:It's a fairy tale.
Again, I ask you, now for the fourth time, have you read Atlas Shrugged?
The use of force is banned in all human interactions in laissez-faire. If you want the governmetn to force regulations on cars, loans, employers... that violates individual rights. You think using such force does not.
We will remain in disagreement, still.
For people that have not read or would like to understand Rand's view on rights, government, please see the following:
http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer? ... d_writings
http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/iss ... rights.asp
Plenty here, too: http://www.theobjectivestandard.com/top ... ts-law.asp
And also look up topics on the Ayn Rand Leicon available for free use here:
http://aynrandlexicon.com/