Joined: Oct 2005 Posts: 6067 Location: Canberra
Thanks: 2495 Thanked: 2456 times in 1840 posts
Re: Ch. 4: Turning The Tide
This chapter presents the awful moral dilemma of the zombie epidemic in stark and clear terms: either sacrifice a large number of innocent people or face human extinction. The architect of the survival plan says "the first casualty of the conflict must be our own sentimentality, for its survival will mean our destruction." (p107)
The idea is that the military retreat to enclaves, and force the remaining mass of the population into centres where they are deliberately exposed to zombies as bait, buying time to prepare for the response and deflecting the flesh eating monsters on to the innocent victims.
Many people find this solution to be morally repugnant. But it is adopted, because the alternative is that everyone dies, or becomes a macabre living dead.
The dilemmas continue. A soldier in Germany confronts the matter of conscience of abandoning innocent civilians to be eaten by zombies. He plans to refuse evacuation orders and is told traitors will be prosecuted with Russian efficiency, through the decimation of mutinous units. In the line of duty, some are classed as necessary, some expendable.
Joined: Mar 2009 Posts: 3564 Location: Michigan
Thanks: 1321 Thanked: 1152 times in 844 posts
Re: Ch. 4: Turning The Tide
It's a hard thing to contemplate, and who would want to be the one to make that decision? But probably, it would have to be this way. Or at least, this decision would be made by those in power.
Life doesn't seem to be geared toward stability. Life over-produces and lets hardship winnow the numbers. Humanity has got to the point where we have far exceeded the natural world's ability to sustain us. We live in such numbers only through our own resourcefulness. When an emergency like this hits, a real existential threat to life, what could we actually save?
it's a difficult thought.
_________________ In the absence of God, I found Man. -Guillermo Del Torro
Have you tried that? Looking for answers? Or have you been content to be terrified of a thing you know nothing about?
Are you pushing your own short comings on us and safely hating them from a distance?
Is this the virtue of faith? To never change your mind: especially when you should?
Young Earth Creationists take offense at the idea that we have a common heritage with other animals. Why is being the descendant of a mud golem any better?
Confidence being an expectation built on past experience, evidence and extrapolation to the future. Faith being an expectation held in defiance of past experience and evidence.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
BookTalk.org is a thriving book discussion forum, online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a community. Our forums are open to anyone in the world. While discussing books is our passion we also have active forums for talking about poetry, short stories, writing and authors. Our general discussion forum section includes forums for discussing science, religion, philosophy, politics, history, current events, arts, entertainment and more. We hope you join us!