The headline here probably overstates how much a new theory can explain the emergence of consciousness. Some very intriguing possibilities though.
http://www.theatlantic.com/science/arch ... ed/485558/
-
In total there are 47 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 47 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
Most users ever online was 851 on Thu Apr 18, 2024 2:30 am
How did consciousness evolve?
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.
All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
- geo
-
- pets endangered by possible book avalanche
- Posts: 4780
- Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
- 15
- Location: NC
- Has thanked: 2198 times
- Been thanked: 2200 times
- ant
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
- 12
- Has thanked: 1371 times
- Been thanked: 969 times
Re: How did consciousness evolve?
This means things like love, and the conclusions a person draws from atheism is nothing but an illusory froth on top of a system designed to cope with sensory overload.
Thanks, Geo. Interesting.
Thanks, Geo. Interesting.
- Interbane
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
- 19
- Location: Da U.P.
- Has thanked: 1105 times
- Been thanked: 2166 times
Re: How did consciousness evolve?
Why be so shallow, even as an antagonist? There's stuff here for both sides.
“In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams
- ant
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
- 12
- Has thanked: 1371 times
- Been thanked: 969 times
Re: How did consciousness evolve?
Hey - you're the one that's shallow with your "love is just a spandrell" gig.
You're projecting your shallowness on to me.
Consciousness arose to accommodate and manage external sensory stimuli.
The rest is just gene propagation and survival.
You're welcome to argue for and against the above. Irrational, but an understandable coping mechanism.
You're projecting your shallowness on to me.
Consciousness arose to accommodate and manage external sensory stimuli.
The rest is just gene propagation and survival.
You're welcome to argue for and against the above. Irrational, but an understandable coping mechanism.
- Interbane
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
- 19
- Location: Da U.P.
- Has thanked: 1105 times
- Been thanked: 2166 times
Re: How did consciousness evolve?
How is it shallow? Some types of love are a spandrel. Most love isn't.ant wrote:Hey - you're the one that's shallow with your "love is just a spandrell" gig.
“In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams
- ant
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
- 12
- Has thanked: 1371 times
- Been thanked: 969 times
Re: How did consciousness evolve?
Interbane wrote:How is it shallow? Some types of love are a spandrel. Most love isn't.ant wrote:Hey - you're the one that's shallow with your "love is just a spandrell" gig.
Oh - now it's "some types" huh?!
So now other types have meaning beyond simple sensory coping mechanisms and "blind" gene survival.
I'm sure nature cares that you think that, right?
- DB Roy
-
Beyond Awesome
- Posts: 1011
- Joined: Fri Mar 06, 2015 10:37 am
- 9
- Has thanked: 43 times
- Been thanked: 602 times
Re: How did consciousness evolve?
The biggest problem of consciousness is consciousness. We say that consciousness is awareness but it is really experience. We are conscious because we experience the world around us. Everything we observe is an experience. The problem is that we can't explain why we should experience anything nor can we explain our experiences. What we take as hard, objective data is really a subjective experience that no one can explain. Where does consciousness come from? All these dry theories that try to explain it have to be understood through consciousness which is a subjective experience that no one can explain because we're trying to reduce consciousness to data which cannot be done. Consciousness is ultimately a quale. Subjective experience (qualia) is not data. Data can be understood through subjective experience but not the other way around.
Subjective experience has always been here. Materialists might say the universe exists independently of consciousness but "universe" is what we observe outside ourselves and that is subjective experience. Universe is subjective experience--no subjective experience, no universe. Materialism not only cannot explain how consciousness should arise from dead matter but cannot predict it either--would have no reason to--except that it exists.
Consciousness then is the ground floor, the foundation, not matter. Matter is only a subjective experience that cannot be explained. We can observe it, measure it, classify it, but we cannot ultimately explain it. We can't say what that chunk of matter before us really is. We cannot even say if it is really there. The only thing we know for certain that exists is consciousness, subjective experience. It is not created, it is not destroyed. It didn't come from anywhere and it is not going anywhere. It is not this, that or the other. It simply is. And somehow, we are part of it.
Subjective experience has always been here. Materialists might say the universe exists independently of consciousness but "universe" is what we observe outside ourselves and that is subjective experience. Universe is subjective experience--no subjective experience, no universe. Materialism not only cannot explain how consciousness should arise from dead matter but cannot predict it either--would have no reason to--except that it exists.
Consciousness then is the ground floor, the foundation, not matter. Matter is only a subjective experience that cannot be explained. We can observe it, measure it, classify it, but we cannot ultimately explain it. We can't say what that chunk of matter before us really is. We cannot even say if it is really there. The only thing we know for certain that exists is consciousness, subjective experience. It is not created, it is not destroyed. It didn't come from anywhere and it is not going anywhere. It is not this, that or the other. It simply is. And somehow, we are part of it.
- Interbane
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 7203
- Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
- 19
- Location: Da U.P.
- Has thanked: 1105 times
- Been thanked: 2166 times
Re: How did consciousness evolve?
Search the archives and find my original wording. You didn't understand me back then either, apparently.ant wrote:Oh - now it's "some types" huh?!
“In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams
- ant
-
- BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
- Posts: 5935
- Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 12:04 pm
- 12
- Has thanked: 1371 times
- Been thanked: 969 times
Re: How did consciousness evolve?
Your worldview simply cannot ground emotions like love in anything that is not reducible to "blind" gene survival.Interbane wrote:Search the archives and find my original wording. You didn't understand me back then either, apparently.ant wrote:Oh - now it's "some types" huh?!
The article added some additions to it: consciousness arose to handle sensory overload. That's basically it. There is nothing profound there for you; propagation and survival of genes within organic vessels that negotiate sensory overload via consciousness.
Your love for your family and friends is your subjective experience and THAT'S it, but it has no objective meaning to blind and purposeless Nature.
Why do you have to be so entirely dishonest about your worldview?
It's really old.