• In total there are 0 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 0 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 616 on Thu Jan 18, 2024 7:47 pm

Complexity and Intelligence

Engage in discussions encompassing themes like cosmology, human evolution, genetic engineering, earth science, climate change, artificial intelligence, psychology, and beyond in this forum.
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.

All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
MadArchitect

1E - BANNED
The Pope of Literature
Posts: 2553
Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2004 4:24 am
19
Location: decentralized

Re: Complexity and Intelligence

Unread post

Interbane: Murder is seen as immoral in all societies, pre-marital sex is not.And I'm saying that's not the case. Murder is not taboo in all societies, and even in those societies where it is taboo, differences in the way in which they formulate the category of murder tend to negate the supposed universality of that moral prohibition. To say that murder is immoral in two cultures is only really meaningful so long as those two cultures are talking about the same thing.Prior to religion, men may not have called certain acts immoral, but the reaction from society was still negative.How would we know that? What evidence is there to support that idea?My reading suggests that consistent social forms -- the cultural organization of a human society -- are the products of religious categories of thought, cf. Emile Durkheim and Marcel Mauss, "Primitive Classification". When you start talking about inherent social forms -- that is, the sort of social foms that you see among other primates, which are instinctual rather than cultural -- then you're talking about the borderline between being human and being another kind of animal.
Post Reply

Return to “Science & Technology”