Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 7191 Location: Da U.P.
Thanks: 1123 Thanked: 2176 times in 1731 posts
Gender: Country:
Re: Chapter 6: Hallucinations
I would think zero progress, without even looking it up. I could be wrong.
_________________ “In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams
Joined: Oct 2007 Posts: 3264 Location: Cheshire, England
Thanks: 329 Thanked: 685 times in 525 posts
Gender: Country:
Re: Chapter 6: Hallucinations
Quote:
ant and Interbane:
ant wrote: Well, Sagan is likely to dismiss anything and everything there is no evidence for, or would be contrary to our understanding of the natural world
Just curious, but is there another way? How should we treat things that are contrary to our understanding of the natural world?
According to Sagan, we can't count the evidence of our own eyes and ears - because we hallucinate. One of the reasons for my belief in the afterlife is that a perfect stranger - gave me a message from someone who had recently passed over and he named the name. The name of the person was 'Jeremy' so it wasn't an all that common name. He also gave me his message which was very personal and meaningful. Now, that was evidence to me.....but means nothing to anyone else much. It made me very happy though, and it was just what that Jeremy would have done.
I think I must add here, in case you get the wrong idea about me and my morals, that Jeremy was the father of my grandson.
_________________ Only those become weary of angling who bring nothing to it but the idea of catching fish.
He was born with the gift of laughter and a sense that the world is mad....
Rafael Sabatini
The following user would like to thank Penelope for this post: ant
Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5936
Thanks: 1381 Thanked: 974 times in 839 posts
Gender: Country:
Re: Chapter 6: Hallucinations
Interbane wrote:
I would think zero progress, without even looking it up. I could be wrong.
Okay, fine.
So at what point does the clock start clicking on a hypothesis that has zero progress after 20 years? If this was a public funds issue, the debate would be over. We simply could not continue to throw money into a "scientific" endeavor simply because its been branded as science by "experts" on alien intelligence.
Right?
BTW, are there any experts on alien intelligence?
Last edited by ant on Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 7191 Location: Da U.P.
Thanks: 1123 Thanked: 2176 times in 1731 posts
Gender: Country:
Re: Chapter 6: Hallucinations
Quote:
So at what point does the clock start clicking on a hypothesis that has zero progress after 20 years?
I don't know... a thousand years? Even that's a blink of an eye on the cosmic timeline. But remember, I'm not advocating keeping the program open. Perhaps it's a good thing when we have a rip roaring economy with a flourishing middle class. But right now there are much better uses for that money.
_________________ “In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams
Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5936
Thanks: 1381 Thanked: 974 times in 839 posts
Gender: Country:
Re: Chapter 6: Hallucinations
Penelope wrote:
Quote:
ant and Interbane:
ant wrote: Well, Sagan is likely to dismiss anything and everything there is no evidence for, or would be contrary to our understanding of the natural world
Just curious, but is there another way? How should we treat things that are contrary to our understanding of the natural world?
According to Sagan, we can't count the evidence of our own eyes and ears - because we hallucinate. One of the reasons for my belief in the afterlife is that a perfect stranger - gave me a message from someone who had recently passed over and he named the name. The name of the person was 'Jeremy' so it wasn't an all that common name. He also gave me his message which was very personal and meaningful. Now, that was evidence to me.....but means nothing to anyone else much. It made me very happy though, and it was just what that Jeremy would have done.
I think I must add here, in case you get the wrong idea about me and my morals, that Jeremy was the father of my grandson.
That's fine. And let me be clear - I am no one to completely dismiss your claims as hallucinations, or corral them into the million other claims that may be similar to yours.
But Sagan would. Why? Because it's contrary to natural laws that apparently are understood enough to rule out millions of anecdotal accounts. AND, there's no evidence to back them up.
But intelligent aliens are treated differently by Sagan from what I see so far:
There's zero evidence for the existence of intelligent alien life that would be capable of communicating BACK .
If you think the very idea of the existence of alien civilizations is incredible, you'd need evidence proportional to your claim.
But Sagan doesn't. You, do, though. Why? Because you aren't a scientist, I guess.
Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5936
Thanks: 1381 Thanked: 974 times in 839 posts
Gender: Country:
Re: Chapter 6: Hallucinations
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
So at what point does the clock start clicking on a hypothesis that has zero progress after 20 years?
I don't know... a thousand years? Even that's a blink of an eye on the cosmic timeline. But remember, I'm not advocating keeping the program open. Perhaps it's a good thing when we have a rip roaring economy with a flourishing middle class. But right now there are much better uses for that money.
Right. Okay..fine.
So, if we had endless money, there wouldn't be a debate .
Since we don't, we'd have to put the debate on the table if it is or isn't "science"
Practical science? Of course it isn't. The debate is over.
Leisure science with a relaxed approach that's mostly on the margins of strict, scientific methodology? I'd say yes, SETI is that. It's quasi science.
What probabilities should we assign to the existence of a communicating alien civilization? There's no way to assign a probability, is there? Is that a good start for a hypothesis? Of course it isn't.
So science is not always science. it depends on the many things
Last edited by ant on Tue Jan 27, 2015 1:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 7191 Location: Da U.P.
Thanks: 1123 Thanked: 2176 times in 1731 posts
Gender: Country:
Re: Chapter 6: Hallucinations
ant wrote:
That's fine. And let me be clear - I am no one to completely dismiss your claims as hallucinations, or corral them into the million other claims that may be similar to yours.
I have no idea how to check, but I'm fairly sure there are millions of incidents of hallucination, where the people understand they are hallucination. Millions more where people are unsure whether it's hallucination or real. And millions more where they're sure it's real(even though it's hallucination).
Now, there could very well be real sightings in that massive pool. It's possible. There could be many people who see real supernatural things, but mistake it as mere hallucination. It would go against the way we know the world works, so we would need millions of pieces of evidence showing that it's a real thing and is not a naturalistic hallucination. In other words, all the existing evidence would need to be overcome. We know people hallucinate, and they do it all the time. We also know people desire belief in the supernatural because it is comforting, even when it most often leads to false beliefs.
The reasoning behind the skepticism of men like Sagan and Randi and all the others is entirely reasonable and rational. It may seem that they frivolously dismiss claims of supernatural sighting, but I assure you there is justification, like an intricate logic puzzle.
_________________ “In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 7191 Location: Da U.P.
Thanks: 1123 Thanked: 2176 times in 1731 posts
Gender: Country:
Re: Chapter 6: Hallucinations
ant wrote:
Just to be clear - I don't think anyone here is arguing that it's not reasonable of them. I can only speak for myself though.
But do you think it's unreasonable to dimiss millions of anecdotal accounts? I think the whole thing is counterintuitive, where the truth is more difficult to understand than what you see at face value.
_________________ “In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams
Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 5936
Thanks: 1381 Thanked: 974 times in 839 posts
Gender: Country:
Re: Chapter 6: Hallucinations
Interbane wrote:
ant wrote:
Just to be clear - I don't think anyone here is arguing that it's not reasonable of them. I can only speak for myself though.
But do you think it's unreasonable to dimiss millions of anecdotal accounts? I think the whole thing is counterintuitive, where the truth is more difficult to understand than what you see at face value.
I'm not certain how we'd be able to dismiss millions without having scrutinized each and every one. Each experience would be unique in its totality. This isn't about counting a thousand swans.
I will say it's easier to hallucinate than most people think, given the right conditions.
Last edited by ant on Wed Jan 28, 2015 5:23 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Joined: Jul 2002 Posts: 2323 Location: Cincinnati, OH
Thanks: 116 Thanked: 936 times in 727 posts
Gender: Country:
Ten Questions to Ask an Alien
Chris OConnor wrote:
I want to post a great paragraph from Ch. 6 that had me laughing:
"Occasionally, I get a letter from someone who is in "contact" with extraterrestrials. I am invited to "ask them anything." And so over the years I've prepared a little list of questions. The extraterrestrials are very advanced, remember. So I ask things like, "Please provide a short proof of Fermat's Last Theorem." Or the Goldbach Conjecture. And then I have to explain what these are, because extraterrestrials will not call it Fermat's Last Theorem. So I write out the simple equation with the exponents. I never get an answer. On the other hand, if I ask something like "Should we be good?" I almost always get an answer. anything vague, especially involving conventional moral judgements, these aliens are extremely happy to respond to. But on anything specific, where there is a chance to find out if they actually know anything beyond what most humans know, there is only silence. Something can be deduced from this differential ability to answer questions." ROFL
Sagan is such a smartass.
Chris
In a footnote to that quote, Sagan poses the following.
Quote:
It's a stimulating exercise to think of questions to which no human knows the answers, but where a correct answer would immediately be recognized as such. It's even more challenging to formulate such questions in fields other than mathematics. Perhaps we should hold a contest and collect the best responses to "Ten Questions to Ask an Alien." p. 100
OK let's play! Anyone have ideas for alien questions?
How about something like: "What new material or technology would revolutionize our current world economy?" "Which planet should we direct our SETI receivers towards? Oh, and the frequency too if you have it!" "How can we encourage people who believe in the same Diety to stop killing each other?"
Joined: Dec 2010 Posts: 2751
Thanks: 2298 Thanked: 731 times in 626 posts
Gender:
Re: Chapter 6: Hallucinations
Quote:
OK let's play! Anyone have ideas for alien questions?
How about something like: "What new material or technology would revolutionize our current world economy?" "Which planet should we direct our SETI receivers towards?"
"have you accepted jesus as your personal saviour?"
"do 1% of you hog all the money and power?" if not "what do you think about us doing it."
"do you have a flag?" (izzard)
"are any of you addressed as 'your royal highness' or something similar?"
The following user would like to thank youkrst for this post: LanDroid
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
BookTalk.org is a thriving book discussion forum, online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a community. Our forums are open to anyone in the world. While discussing books is our passion we also have active forums for talking about poetry, short stories, writing and authors. Our general discussion forum section includes forums for discussing science, religion, philosophy, politics, history, current events, arts, entertainment and more. We hope you join us!