Just ruminating on that beautiful Freudian slip - 'untiarian'. Does that mean people who untie the bonds of past delusion?ginof wrote:Respectfully, I think some Churches do a pretty good job of embracing science based information. The ones that do so have given up their dogmatic past and expect that what we know about the world changes. I'm thinking of the more humanist based ones like Ethical Culture, Untiarian Universalism and others. My guess is that your comment was really focused on the more main stream religions, but I wanted to point out that they are not ALL like that.KayR wrote:Churches haven't yet figured out how to deal with a science-based culture like we have today.
But seriously, I think religion has a long way to go to become scientific. Fantasy is so hardwired in at the centre of faith that clear analysis is beset by rampant prejudice on all sides.
The best example in my view is the existence of Jesus Christ. People simply cannot imagine psychological delusion on the scale required to invent Jesus, but the available evidence, for example the apparent non-existence of Nazareth until after about 50 AD, indicates that fictional invention is the most plausible scientific hypothesis for the emergence of the Gospels.
The level of fantasy in religion is a continuum from Mormonism and other traditional creationist dreams at one end, through liberal faith in the middle, to scientific atheism at the other end. This problem of assessing religious faith by scientific methods is a fertile field for research, especially in regard to seeing the role of shared stories in building community.