• In total there are 0 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 0 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 616 on Thu Jan 18, 2024 7:47 pm

Are you a person of convictions?

Engage in conversations about worldwide religions, cults, philosophy, atheism, freethought, critical thinking, and skepticism in this forum.
Forum rules
Do not promote books in this forum. Instead, promote your books in either Authors: Tell us about your FICTION book! or Authors: Tell us about your NON-FICTION book!.

All other Community Rules apply in this and all other forums.
User avatar
Interbane

2B - MOD & SILVER
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 7203
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
19
Location: Da U.P.
Has thanked: 1105 times
Been thanked: 2166 times
United States of America

Re: Nietzsche on Convictions

Unread post

Lol Chris.I wrote my previous post in haste, so I'd like to clarify my position. Regardless of individual bias, there is an absolute truth to every opinion or circumstance or so called fact. This absolute truth is independent of human knowledge, it is the way the universe truly is. We humans try our best to determine what is true and what is not, but there is no way to know for certain. When I hear opinions or learn new things, I see those things as having a probability of truth. I place these this infomation on a spectrum in my head ranging from 'most definitely true' to 'most definitely false.' Pardon my assumption, but I believe that by definition, a conviction is something that you fully believe in. Therefore, everything at the 'most definitely true' end of the spectrum is a conviction in my book.My above post was criticizing those people who take new information, and for whatever reason(they want to believe it, they fear it's true, etc.) they place it at the 'most definitely true' end of the spectrum without realizing how large of a probability there is that this information is false. I assume that those are the types of convictions that Neitzsche claims as dangerous.For future reference(in case I turn out to be a long term poster here,) I place the existence of god near the middle of the spectrum, since there is absolutely no concrete evidence either way whether he exists or not. However, I do not believe that he exists. I believe in the Bible even less, but that is another thread I believe.
Post Reply

Return to “Religion & Philosophy”