Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Jul 20, 2019 4:59 am





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
America's lost Large Hadron Collider 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Tenured Professor

BookTalk.org Moderator

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3564
Location: Michigan
Thanks: 1321
Thanked: 1149 times in 843 posts
Gender: Male

Post America's lost Large Hadron Collider
In another thread I brought up that the LHC at CERN was less expensive to construct than Donald Trump's ludicrous and aggressively bigoted border wall proposal between the US and Mexico. Somebody jokingly said that we should let China build the next LHC.

That's not such a great idea.

If we had built the Super Collider that we had planned we would have attracted thousands of the worlds most brilliant minds to our country to do work on this subject.

We would be positioned as a world leader in science and technology again, instead of standing on the sidelines while someone else, somewhere else does what we used to do in the 60's and 70's.

Studies have been done which show that these kinds of scientific endeavors produce more dollars than they spend.

How would they do that? What do we do with the fact that the Higgs Boson exists and we found it? Well, we aren't immediately going to make a better battery with it, or a generator, or drive train. Right now the knowledge we have about the Higgs Boson is as useless as when Heinrich Hertz discovered radio waves.

Quote:
I do not think that the radio waves I have discovered will have any practical application.
-Heinrich Hertz


But knowing fundamental physics means we know more about how the world works. And when you know how the world works you know how to GET it to work for you. Though the Higgs field may or may not eventually lead to any particular invention all on it's own there is no doubt that all the effort expended in the search for it certainly does yield results.

When you are pushing the boundaries of science you necessarily push the boundaries of technology.

Image

This is not off the rack gear. Making this means making better circuitry, magnets, computing storage mechanisms, algorithms and information processing techniques.

You can't cram higgs bosons into a jar and have a better fire extinguisher... but the technological expertise required to find the higgs boson means better technological know-how all around. To make THAT magnet work we had to make magnets better. And that information will spread. The Higgs field, by the way, was just what was expected to be found there. Whatever comes next will be more exciting than that for particle physicists and lead to actual new science.

Just having all of these minds in the same place working and playing together produces value far far far in excess of the 9 billion dollars it took to build the LHC. The most obvious example is the internet. The internet was invented at CERN by particle physicists who wanted an easier way to share particle physics experiment data with eachother.

Now people's lives in the developed countries revolve around the internet.


_________________
In the absence of God, I found Man.
-Guillermo Del Torro

Have you tried that? Looking for answers?
Or have you been content to be terrified of a thing you know nothing about?

Are you pushing your own short comings on us and safely hating them from a distance?

Is this the virtue of faith? To never change your mind: especially when you should?

Young Earth Creationists take offense at the idea that we have a common heritage with other animals. Why is being the descendant of a mud golem any better?

Confidence being an expectation built on past experience, evidence and extrapolation to the future. Faith being an expectation held in defiance of past experience and evidence.


Sat Apr 09, 2016 8:30 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Book Discussion Leader
BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor

Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 2039
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Thanks: 74
Thanked: 768 times in 594 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: America's lost Large Hadron Collider
Quote:
Somebody jokingly said that we should let China build the next LHC.
That's not such a great idea.

I wasn't joking, China is building the next LHC. "The final concept design for the project is on schedule to be completed by the end of 2016" and will be much bigger than CERN. Now for America to benefit from an LHC of our own, we'd have to build one much larger than China's system unless we want to replicate previous experiments. How big would the largest LHC have to be and at what cost? Sorry, but America has already proved we don't have the backbone to accomplish that. (Unless we tie the biggest LHC to improved military weapons, then it would be a very easy sell. "There is a MASSIVE WEAPONS GAP - China is WAY ahead of the U.S.! We are ALL GOING TO DIE!")

IIRC, in addition to rising budgets, one of the criticisms of the cancelled super-collider in Texas was that investment for nuclear physicists, the high priests of science, was sucking dollars away from other science projects making it more difficult to fund anything else. Perhaps a better approach would be a large number of smaller international projects related to anti-aging, life extension, disease prevention, efficient food supplies, disease cures, renewable energy, carbon reduction, mental health, and so on that help everyone and could save massive amounts of money in the long run. And as you say, all these technologies would unleash other unforeseen benefits. Is it a higher priority for America to discover the next sub-atomic particle or, for one example, a cure for Alzheimer's?



Sat Apr 09, 2016 9:40 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Book King


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1332
Thanks: 1386
Thanked: 657 times in 536 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: America's lost Large Hadron Collider
Hello. Just wanted to jump in to mention that a CERN friend from Geneva took a job at one of the multiple mini-colliders being put up around Europe. Apparently they have genuine medical applications already. Who knew?

I gather that CERN is ramping down employment now that the Higgs is found (they still have something like four major enquiries going on, including at least one that may help to understand fundamental aspects of physics, but they don't seem to keep quite so many employed.) So it is kind of an interesting idea, politically, economically and scientifically, that mini-colliders can carry on some of their technical excellence.



Thu Apr 14, 2016 4:34 pm
Profile Email
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Site Resources 
HELPFUL INFO:
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!

IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

PROMOTE YOUR BOOK!
Advertise on BookTalk.org
How To Promote Your Book





BookTalk.org is a thriving book discussion forum, online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a community. Our forums are open to anyone in the world. While discussing books is our passion we also have active forums for talking about poetry, short stories, writing and authors. Our general discussion forum section includes forums for discussing science, religion, philosophy, politics, history, current events, arts, entertainment and more. We hope you join us!


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSOUR BOOKSAUTHOR INTERVIEWSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICYSITEMAP

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism Books

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2019. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank