Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Sep 22, 2021 10:17 am





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 272 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 19  Next
173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates 
Author Message
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Banned

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 513
Location: Texas
Thanks: 16
Thanked: 107 times in 87 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
Meanwhile, back in the presidential race...

Excellent campaign videos:

Let them eat ice cream
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_WzB3YRB4w0

Image

Biden ad
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UMFsz0VX9mY

I don't know why the Democrats (or the Democratic leadership) would even WANT to replace Donald Trump now, given what's happened with the Coronavirus. The conservative movement is dead in America, at least the part of it that wants "smaller government." Government has EXPLODED under Trump. Federal govt, state govts, municipal govts...tinpot dictatorships crowding one another, overlapping, exerting multiple authorities over people. How could the communist Dems improve on that? They bray about wanting social control, and it's here, in spades.

* The Dems want a Universal Basic Income. Well, the federal govt is now issuing money for workers not working. And Bernie Sanders wasn't even needed.

* The Dems/communists want abolition of private property. That'll be happening shortly when people are booted from their abodes for non-payment of rent/mortgage.

* The Dems want socialized healthcare and that's coming. Hospitals are now empty, awaiting the hordes of coronavirus patients that aren't coming. It's estimated that as many as half of America's clinics and hospitals will go out of business because of the imposition of lockdowns. When the dust settles the Dems will say that capitalist healthcare just didn't work, so it's time for Obamacare II. Of course, the truth is that govt intrusion killed the healthcare system, but truth doesn't really matter to communists.

* The Dems much-beloved death panels will finally be realized, actually are already being realized. Hospitals are being kept empty for the coronavirus patients, and meanwhile people in need of life-saving care are dying at home. But abortions are still being performed. Each one is a little human sacrifice that's "essential" to the death cult of the Democratic Party.

* The government is shutting down small businesses, shuttering shops because of a weaponized cold virus. And the Dems are happy because you just CANNOT have a self-reliant populace. Everybody must be dependent on the state. It's estimated that as much as 80% of America's small business won't survive this.

* The Dems/communists want workers rioting in the streets, and that will no doubt be happening soon. China (a strong Democratic National Committee ally) just closed its meat processing plants in America. Availability of meat is now cut in half. And in a month 50 million of America's 164 million workers will be unemployed. So there will be food riots. The Dems will view that as a win.

* The godless Dems are getting traction in their fight against Christianity. Not in my area, where the churches are packed every Sunday, but the ChiCom-controlled media shows us Christian pastors being hounded and arrested for practicing freedom of religion. I don't think even Hussein Obama could have got away with this kind of anti-Christian behavior.

* The collectivist Dems have nice little snitch networks set up in Democrat-run states. You're now encouraged to report on neighbors who step out of their front doors. That's how the Stasi controlled East Germany, with snitches.

And on and on. I honestly don't know how the Dems could improve things, from their point of view, by getting rid of Donald Trump.



Tue Apr 21, 2020 9:32 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Chatterbox


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1812
Thanks: 2218
Thanked: 978 times in 775 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
From the NY Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/25/opin ... ogin=email
Quote:
For over three years now many Americans have been anxiously waiting for Mr. Trump to grow into the job, to show that he understands he is the leader of the whole country and not just his core supporters.



The following user would like to thank Harry Marks for this post:
ant
Sun Apr 26, 2020 8:33 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5936
Thanks: 1381
Thanked: 974 times in 839 posts
Gender: None specified
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
Harry Marks wrote:
From the NY Times
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/25/opin ... ogin=email
Quote:
For over three years now many Americans have been anxiously waiting for Mr. Trump to grow into the job, to show that he understands he is the leader of the whole country and not just his core supporters.



Good article. Had to read it from my phone because of the the paywall I hit using my desktop. Good ol' NY Times.. Still charging to read its content when millions and millions of Americans are unemployed because of a pandemic.

Don't you want to comment on Trump's apparent dislike of dogs?

The article seems to also blame Trump for the 10 of thousands of lives lost to the coronavirus.
But you don't agree with that entirely.. It's the viruses fault mostly (anthropomorphizing?) and not China's covering up of the leakage and i's silencing of Chinese journalists and doctors that were desperately trying to warn the world of an oncoming pandemic.



Last edited by ant on Sun Apr 26, 2020 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.



Sun Apr 26, 2020 10:20 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Chatterbox


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1812
Thanks: 2218
Thanked: 978 times in 775 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
ant wrote:
Good article. Had to read it from my phone because of the the paywall I hit using my desktop. Good ol' NY Times.. Still charging to read its content when millions and millions of Americans are unemployed because of a pandemic.


They say their pandemic coverage is free. I don't know, since I pay to read their paper. Probably opinions about his dogginess, or lack thereof, don't qualify as pandemic coverage.



Sun Apr 26, 2020 7:26 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5936
Thanks: 1381
Thanked: 974 times in 839 posts
Gender: None specified
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
Joe Biden

"economic intercourse"



The entire country should be concerned about an outbreak of STDs if Biden is elected president.



Tue Apr 28, 2020 12:37 pm
Profile Email
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Banned

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 513
Location: Texas
Thanks: 16
Thanked: 107 times in 87 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
Tara Reade says Joe Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993. Actions and statements by others at the time support her claim. And now a video clip from the Larry King Show, 1993, has turned up. Reade's mother called into the show about the incident:

Tara Reade's Mother Interview Clip on Larry King (1993)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gsvpXc0pH0

But all the major Democrats have now lined up behind Biden. Hillary Clinton yaps about women's rights but has ignored Biden's assault of Reade:

Tara Reade torches Hillary Clinton for endorsing Biden, says she's 'enabling a sexual predator'
"I voted for Hillary Clinton in 2016. I voted for her in the primary. I'm a lifelong Democrat. But yet, what I see now is someone enabling a sexual predator and it was my former boss, Joe Biden, who raped me."
yourdestinationnow.com/2020/04/tara-rea ... n-for.html

So Biden has some libido issues to deal with.

Image

And then there's Biden's senility. The Democratic National Committee has him where they want him for now, in a basement, and the videos he does from there are painful to watch. I think it's elder abuse. A SWAT team should kick in the door and rescue him.

Everybody knows that he's not fit to serve as president, so the Dems have come up with a strategy. They want to put him in the White House, then declare him incompetent and elevate the Vice-President.

Biden said he would pick a woman of color as a running mate. Oprah can't run, because she was a teenaged prostitute. Kamala Harris stumbled around on one of the debate stages drunk, so it won't likely be her. Maybe Michelle Obama. She has a new PBS show where she reads to kids. Here she is reading:

Image

No, it wasn't a horror story; that's what she considers an appropriate face for children. Put that on a campaign poster and see how well she does.

Stacey Abrams of Georgia is campaigning for the vice-president's job. And she's a contender because she was invited to this year's Bilderberg meeting. The owners of the world like to look their flunkies over before hiring:

Stacey Abrams Went To Bilderberg
Not Good For Her Populist Credentials

https://nationalfile.com/stacey-abrams- ... ilderberg/

So those are the main names Biden has to play with. We shall see.

But I honestly don't see why the power elite would want to get rid of Trump. He's surrendering America to centralized banking, which is Communism 101. In this case it's kind of a hybrid of communism and fascism, but still it's totalitarian. And that's what the Dems like.

The US Federal Reserve is a group of private banks that finances the US. And both the Dems and the Reps in our government are in the process of giving the Fed unlimited power to "print money." With that money the Fed is buying up the world. It's not America that's buying the world, it's the consortium of private banks operating under the aegis of the US. And Trump backs the action 100%. He's selling us out, literally. Though not as fast as Clinton would have.

THIS ENGINEERED SOCIAL & ECONOMIC POWDER KEG IS READY TO BLOW
(The segment from 13:15 to 16:15 is an EXCELLENT summary of what's happening right now)
youtube.com/watch?v=js60_2NdZFQ&fea ... e=youtu.be

Anyway, the Leftists are getting what they want out of Trump. I don't see how they could do better with Biden.

The Fed. EXPANDS Debt Purchases: THEY NOW OWN THE WORLD. Mannarino
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dU8gURk77E4



Thu Apr 30, 2020 11:21 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Chatterbox


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1812
Thanks: 2218
Thanked: 978 times in 775 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
KindaSkolarly wrote:
But all the major Democrats have now lined up behind Biden. Hillary Clinton yaps about women's rights but has ignored Biden's assault of Reade:

So Biden has some libido issues to deal with.
Yep, it's totally embarrassing, but I am going to state the obvious - if you are concerned about women's rights, it is clear who is better between Biden and Bozo. If you are concerned about sexual misconduct, it is clear who is better between Biden and Mr. Access Hollywood. If you are concerned about character, it is clear who is better between Biden and the Bastard.

If the Republicans put up Romney or (the late) McCain against this, I would seriously consider casting my first Republican vote for President ever. The day of sexual abusers remaining in power is long past. I hope Biden wins and then resigns in disgrace. At least the Dems know what to do about disgrace, or at least most of them do.

KindaSkolarly wrote:
Everybody knows that he's not fit to serve as president, so the Dems have come up with a strategy. They want to put him in the White House, then declare him incompetent and elevate the Vice-President.
I disagree about his fitness. He was an excellent Vice-President and did far better against the 2008 crisis than this lot is doing against the Covid crisis, but again, when I look at who he is running against, I would vote for him with half his brain removed. He would still be more able than what we have.

KindaSkolarly wrote:
Biden said he would pick a woman of color as a running mate.
No, actually he said he would pick a woman. Klobuchar and Whitmer are still viable.

KindaSkolarly wrote:
Oprah can't run, because she was a teenaged prostitute.
I have never heard this before, but I know we elected a guy who is a tax cheat, a ripoff artist against suppliers, a Kremlin toady and a complete narcissist. If anyone on the right ever dreamed of taking the moral high ground in an election, they have pretty much sabotaged that to the extent it can be sabotaged. Oh, I guess Dear Leader could call for his son to be tied up in front of artillery and blown away on live TV. That would lose him one or two votes, but, you know, abortion!

KindaSkolarly wrote:
The US Federal Reserve is a group of private banks that finances the US.
That's pretty much a complete canard. There are no private banks (yet) whose board is appointed by the government. The Fed is independent but accountable.

KindaSkolarly wrote:
And both the Dems and the Reps in our government are in the process of giving the Fed unlimited power to "print money."
It already has unlimited power to print money. And, astonishingly enough, it has never in 100 years of existence used it for anything except responsible policy. This could change people's opinions of "bureaucrats" if the word ever got out, but, hey, not much danger of that.



The following user would like to thank Harry Marks for this post:
DWill, geo
Sat May 02, 2020 11:52 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5936
Thanks: 1381
Thanked: 974 times in 839 posts
Gender: None specified
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
it's almost funny how Trump and Biden represent the worst of both political parties. Both are deplorable in their own right and each of their base to willing to match each others overt hypocrisy for the sake of keeping or getting their guy into the Oval office.

Take Joe Biden:

Biden is on record saying women who allege they've been victims of sexual assault ought to be believed:

Quote:
For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it’s been made worse or better over time,”
Biden to Huffpost 2018

Now he is denying Tara Reade's allegations which recently have been confirmed by a second person:


Quote:
They aren’t true. This never happened.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... -statement


Or how about Joe Biden's public creepiness with young girls, telling them "Don't date till your 30" and making them feel physically uncomfortable in public by touching them inappropriately (37 seconds into vid - ignore the stupid music - just one example)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C8YvJ5wAHl0

This is no longer about "voting for the lesser evil" It's now I'm voting for my lowlife creep because he's my lowlife creep, and I don't care what I've said in the past about yours anymore


The worst of both sides is on display.. No one gets any moral victory points for voting blue because blue is openly supporting an openly immoral guy.

IF I HAD BEEN A TRUMP VOTER my vote might as well stay where it's at.
Who would I think I'd be fooling anyway?



The following user would like to thank ant for this post:
Harry Marks
Sun May 03, 2020 8:22 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Platinum Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6923
Location: Luray, Virginia
Thanks: 2252
Thanked: 2454 times in 1850 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
ant wrote:
IF I HAD BEEN A TRUMP VOTER my vote might as well stay where it's at.
Who would I think I'd be fooling anyway?

You might vote for someone else down on the ballot. You might not vote at all. But to stick with Trump is saying that the scales are balanced because of the accusation against Biden. Even on just the sexual assault allegations, Trump is much worse. When you add in how well he governs--certainly one of the worst presidents in history--there is nothing anywhere near equivalence between the two.

Biden needs to show complete openness to investigation of the accusation. If he does the Hillary Clinton thing, he should be replaced. If there's clear evidence against him, he also should be replaced.

Edit: I realize he can't be replaced except at the convention, which may or may not be held.



Last edited by DWill on Mon May 04, 2020 11:16 am, edited 1 time in total.



Mon May 04, 2020 6:16 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 5936
Thanks: 1381
Thanked: 974 times in 839 posts
Gender: None specified
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
DWill wrote:

Quote:
But to stick with Trump is saying that the scales are balanced because of the accusation against Biden


Putting aside a global pandemic that originated oversees (including related things as an unprecedented quarantining of millions of healthy people and a near full stop of the economy) here is a snapshot of how the country was doing:

The economy added 6 million jobs, and the unemployment rate dropped to the lowest level in nearly 50 years.

Median household income rose 2.3%. Average weekly paychecks rose 2.8%. The poverty rate and food stamp rolls declined.

Manufacturing jobs rose by 482,000

Less overseas job outsourcing

Economy grew faster under Trump than Obama

Much less federal regulation under Trump

Gun sales actually DROPPED under Trump. The media says nothing about that.

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/10/trump ... 19-update/



Tougher position on illegal border crossings. The issue of immigrant apprehension, detention, and deportation under Trump continuously referred to as sheer racism continues to baffle me.
As a grandchild of immigrants that made their way here to Californian in the early 1900s via legal immigration from Mexico, the arguments look differently from my perspective.

My grandparents worked hard, ran their own business, saved their money, and lived their lives the way they wished.
Why aren't we including immigrants that stood in line, waited, and respected the immigration process in this entire "illegal immigration" conversation?

My family has sponsored the legal citizenship of two families wanting a better life here in the US. These families honored the system in place and are now hard working citizens.
Why are they not praised more by the left for respecting codified law?

Under Trump, deportation is synonymous with racism. Under Obama, known during his presidency as "The Deporter in Chief" it scarcely was even a blip on the map.
Mexican / American advocacy groups were knocking on Obama's door his entire presidency about his mass deportations. Where was the support from Obama's shills?
If I was a undocumented immigrant, why would I feel better about a black man deporting me instead of a white man?

Detention cages at the border weren't built by a white supremacist in office.. They were built by our first black president. They were built to use:

Quote:
The Obama administration, not the Trump administration, built the cages that hold many immigrant children at the U.S.-Mexico border.



https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/obama ... mmigrants/



This side issue also seems to have entirely been missed by liberals. I find it incredible no other president in the last 20 years even so much as considered passing an animal cruelty law like this:

https://www.npr.org/2019/11/25/78284265 ... eral-crime


Trump doesn't seem to like dogs. That talking point was circulating recently and was one more thing to add to all his uncountable flaws.
And yet, he's the first president to take the time to make the abuse of animals a federal crime. Talk about scoring a moral victory for living creatures that don't have to be human to be protected!
That's advancement in my book.


Trump is a bane for celebrity and self proclaimed armchair intellectuals who despise his off the cuff, poor oratory skills. The very idea these same people are willing to attach their names to an obviously seriously senile, sexual predator who has proven nothing politically goes to the essence of the shameful hypocrisy that's rampant on both sides. They are not the people's champions because they are no better when the lights are turned on.


Again, why would I vote for Biden and not for someone that was in fact generating some positives for the country?



Mon May 04, 2020 1:56 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Chatterbox


Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1812
Thanks: 2218
Thanked: 978 times in 775 posts
Gender: None specified

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
ant wrote:
Manufacturing jobs rose by 482,000

Accurate, but CNN gives some perspective.
https://www.cnn.com/2020/02/08/economy/ ... index.html
Quote:
Most of the half-million new manufacturing jobs over the past three years are in the Sun Belt or around Silicon Valley. Meanwhile job losses in the Rust Belt are accelerating. That could be key to the 2020 race.
Trump won Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin in 2016, promising working-class voters he would revive US manufacturing. But all four states have lost more than 16,000 factory jobs in the past year alone.
And many new production jobs are non-union with lower pay, according to Pew Research. That translates to the loss of good wages for Americans without a college degree, the majority of which voted Trump into office.
The article also points out that a post-recession growth in auto purchases played a large role, which means it would have happened under Hillary as well. And shale oil played a big role, which was already collapsing before Covid kicked the stuffings out of the oil and gas market.

ant wrote:
Less overseas job outsourcing
Probably true, but it was already declining before Trump. If he has anything to claim credit for, it is a fall in replacement of U.S. manufacturing by Chinese and Mexican exports. But those were also slowing, and it is hard to know whether they would have slowed further, or even stopped (the academic work showing China competition had a big role was just coming out in 2016) with a Democrat in the White House.

ant wrote:
Economy grew faster under Trump than Obama

This did not sound right to me. I have not yet found a definitive answer, but this discussion from Business Insider sheds some light:
https://markets.businessinsider.com/new ... n-steady-1
Quote:
The unemployment rate hovered between 4% and 6% for most of the Bush presidency, spiking dramatically during the 2008-09 financial crisis to 7.8% just as he left office in January 2009.

As a result, Obama inherited an economy in free-fall. The unemployment rate peaked at 10.2% in October 2009 during the recession and 8.7 million jobs were lost from early 2007 and 2010, according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. But it started falling steadily in 2011 and that trend continued for the rest of the Obama presidency.

The graph at that page is particularly useful. Unfortunately I could not get it to copy. It shows that "Growth in the Obama administration" is particularly biased because the first two quarters were very negative due to the fallout from the Bush collapse. After that his rate of growth compared favorably to Trump's (I am not sure whose was actually higher, if you leave out the time of disaster in each) Looks like a simple continuation under DT.

ant wrote:
Much less federal regulation under Trump
His deregulation has been really bad for the environment and bad for U.S. workers as well. Maybe there was some good deregulation but I am unaware of it.

ant wrote:
Under Trump, deportation is synonymous with racism. Under Obama, known during his presidency as "The Deporter in Chief" it scarcely was even a blip on the map.
Mexican / American advocacy groups were knocking on Obama's door his entire presidency about his mass deportations. Where was the support from Obama's shills?
If I was a undocumented immigrant, why would I feel better about a black man deporting me instead of a white man?
I think this is a fair point but the rhetoric matters as well. Trump has gone out of his way to insult and demonize Mexicans, and it is clear that his wall is aimed at people whose skin is too brown, not at people who are coming to America. I think you can make a fair case for Trump's real policies, such as freezing DACA and getting rid of the lottery for immigration so that rich and educated immigrants once again get priority. The trouble is the way he advocates for these policies is really, genuinely racist. I think you would have trouble making that case about Obama's deportations (which he did take quite a bit of flak for, including before 2016).

Quote:
This side issue also seems to have entirely been missed by liberals. I find it incredible no other president in the last 20 years even so much as considered passing an animal cruelty law like this:
Under Federalism this has traditionally been a state issue. We might all hate cockfighting and lax regulation of horseracing, but if some states want to allow them, there is not an interstate commerce issue that the U.S. should step in for.

Quote:
Again, why would I vote for Biden and not for someone that was in fact generating some positives for the country?

We could start with Trump's avowed goal of eliminating the Affordable Care Act, for which he has still not come up with the promised alternative. With Covid in the air it should be clear that tens of millions of uninsured citizens is no less than a threat to my life. Not to mention theirs.

Then we could talk about corruption, and the way Trump has sold energy policy and environmental policy to the corporate bidders. And the way he is happy to use the law enforcement powers of the government to excuse people who support him (or even just say nice things about him) and to persecute those who don't. We passed a bunch of laws after Watergate and J. Edgar Hoover to stop that sort of thing, but Trump thinks they are terribly unfair and bad and the government doesn't have to obey them. Which is horrible in itself, aside from what he wants to do if he is given free rein.



Mon May 04, 2020 6:10 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Platinum Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6923
Location: Luray, Virginia
Thanks: 2252
Thanked: 2454 times in 1850 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
ant wrote:
Putting aside a global pandemic that originated oversees (including related things as an unprecedented quarantining of millions of healthy people and a near full stop of the economy) here is a snapshot of how the country was doing:

My contention that Donald Trump is one of our worst presidents doesn't depend on his performance during the pandemic. You apparently think he has done well, or that the circumstances would have overwhelmed any president, but I believe his deficiencies are shown in the record of January, February, and March, in particular. You've already claimed that he has been blamed for every death from covid-19, which is a straw-man approach to his defense. Not a single critic of his who I have listened to has said that. But again, the judgment of Trump as one of the worst presidents stands very securely if you look at 2019 and earlier.
Quote:
The economy added 6 million jobs, and the unemployment rate dropped to the lowest level in nearly 50 years.

Presiding over an economy with some good indicators is all that's needed, then, for a good job rating. We might need to look at the tax cut whose greatest benefit was to the wealthy and that has further ballooned our federal debt. Under Trump, fiscal responsibility has suddenly vanished from the Republican agenda, except that they continue to fear that poor people might receive lavish benefits from Medicaid or SNAP. But let's not see socialism for the rich as any problem at all.
Quote:
The Obama administration, not the Trump administration, built the cages that hold many immigrant children at the U.S.-Mexico border.

While Obama's deportations weren't held against him by mainstream liberals, he did not mismanage family separations in the disastrous and cruel manner of the Trump administration.
Quote:
Trump is a bane for celebrity and self proclaimed armchair intellectuals who despise his off the cuff, poor oratory skills.

It amuses me the way Trump apologists excuse his behavior in the highest job in the land as a matter of "style," or, here, as poor "oratory." It's as if what a president says and and how he says it don't matter at all. Since his election, we've seen multiple instances that cry out for the question asked of Joe McCarthy: "Have you no sense of decency left, at long last?" And yet all of that that relates to character doesn't matter, we're told.

Trump's competence as a manager is severely in doubt. If he ran his companies with the same skill level, no wonder he became a serial bankrupt. Trump is the undisputed king of falsehoods as well. Another statement we hear regarding that is, "all politicians lie"--a cynical and lazy defense of this president who has rarely served a day without misleading us or lying to us.



The following user would like to thank DWill for this post:
Harry Marks
Tue May 05, 2020 6:39 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

BookTalk.org Moderator
Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7193
Location: Da U.P.
Thanks: 1123
Thanked: 2176 times in 1731 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
If you want a decent read on how a whackjob like KindaScholarly is incapable of being convinced of his wrongness,look here.

It's the last part of a series, which I would recommend reading in its entirety. He pulls from many sources, including Haidt and other books we've read.


_________________
In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a bad move.” - Douglas Adams


The following user would like to thank Interbane for this post:
geo
Tue May 05, 2020 7:00 am
Profile
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Banned

Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 513
Location: Texas
Thanks: 16
Thanked: 107 times in 87 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
My proxy server won't open that link. Is it porno? About Biden? These guys have the right idea. Imagine if the Secret Service wasn't around to protect that old perv:

Image

And here's a blast from the past. A sweet bit of video in which Biden says "We could build a wall forty stories high..." lol

Joe Biden Rails Against "Illegals," Calls For 700 Mile Border Fence In Resurfaced 2006 Video
https://youtu.be/rR6wdwkaWGA

Oh, and Biden has already sealed away his documents from his days as a senator, archived them. And now he won't pull them out to let reporters search them for sex crimes. He says that Trump might use the info from the files against him. lol. Do ya' think so, Sherlock?

Tara Reade calls for release of Biden's Senate records: 'Why are they under seal?'
Tara Reade, the woman who has accused Joe Biden of sexual assault, is calling on the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee to release the records from his 36 years as a senator, which are currently inaccessible to the public and are kept at the University of Delaware....
foxnews.com/politics/tara-reade-calls-o ... te-records

Biden: Sealed Senate Records Could Be "Taken Out Of Context" And Used As Campaign Fodder
"The fact is, that there’s a lot of things that of speeches I’ve made, positions I’ve taken, interviews that I did overseas with people, all of those things relating to my job. And the idea that they would be made public and the fact while I was running for public office, they could be really taken out of context. The papers are position papers, they are documents that existed and that for example when I go, when I met with Putin or when I met with whomever. And all of that to be fodder in a campaign at this time," Biden said Friday.
realclearpolitics.com/video/2020/05/01/ ... odder.html

We taxpayers PAID Biden's salary while he was in the Senate. We have a right to see the records. It's preposterous that they're sealed anyway. Public money, public records.



Tue May 05, 2020 9:03 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

Platinum Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 6923
Location: Luray, Virginia
Thanks: 2252
Thanked: 2454 times in 1850 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: 173 Declared Democratic Presidential Candidates
I first thought Biden needed to open up the U of Delaware records, too. Now I think he has a good reason not to allow it. How many of Trump's records, on taxes, education, can Biden's side see? None. There are over 1,700 boxes. Giving carte blanche to go through all of those could take months, dragging this issue out until the election and giving the opposition other fodder. They aren't entitled to it.

By the way, Biden giving his rationale makes sense in a way Donald Trump rarely does. A couple of people around here should stop alleging Biden has Alzheimer's or some other dementia. It's irresponsible. Even a medical doctor wouldn't make a diagnosis without examining the patient. If you've had anyone close to you suffer from dementia, you also will know that Biden doesn't have it. It is a rare 77-year-old who hasn't lost a step or two. It's called age-related cognitive decline.



The following user would like to thank DWill for this post:
geo, Harry Marks
Thu May 07, 2020 10:00 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 272 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ... 19  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Site Resources 
HELPFUL INFO:
Community Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Author Interview Transcripts
Book Discussion Leaders

IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
Banned Books
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Coming Soon!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Coming Soon!

PROMOTE YOUR BOOK!
Advertise on BookTalk.org
Promote your FICTION book
Promote your NON-FICTION book





BookTalk.org is a thriving book discussion forum, online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a community. Our forums are open to anyone in the world. While discussing books is our passion we also have active forums for talking about poetry, short stories, writing and authors. Our general discussion forum section includes forums for discussing science, religion, philosophy, politics, history, current events, arts, entertainment and more. We hope you join us!


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSOUR BOOKSAUTHOR INTERVIEWSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICYSITEMAP

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism Books

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2021. All rights reserved.

Display Pagerank