| BookTalk.org News |
| • If you are having trouble with logging into your account or making posts please know that we are working to resolve this issue. Please delete your temporary Internet files and cookies (at least those for our site) and stay tuned to see if that resolves the issue. If not our web designer believes he can find the code that is causing the issue. |
| Show us where you live! |
 |
| Donate & Support BookTalk.org |
Please support our free community by making a credit card donation through our secure PayPal account. We appreciate and depend on the generosity of our members. Thank you!
•
See who supports us
|
|
| Would you be an atheist without science? |
| Yes; I would have broken with religion either way. |
|
72% |
[ 8 ] |
| No; familiarity with science was instrumental to my break with religion. |
|
9% |
[ 1 ] |
| Maybe; science played some part, but there's a 50/50 chance I'd have take then same path. |
|
9% |
[ 1 ] |
| I'm not sure; I honestly don't know how crucial my relationship to science was in the development of my atheism. |
|
9% |
[ 1 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 11 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Frank 013  Beyond Awesome BookTalk.org Moderator

Joined: 08 Nov 2005
Posts: 1063
Gender: 
Location: NY

|
Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2007 2:47 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
I put that I would have broken from religion either way, but that is not totally accurate for me. I never believed in a god or gods. I was never indoctrinated into any religion so I never had to break away from religion.
I did have a good appreciation for science from an early age, I was lucky enough to have gone to a private school where our classes had the best available materials and I got to experience several disciplines scientific as well as others. Back in those early years (4th through 8th grade) I loved studying dinosaur fossils, geology and literature… subjects (minus geology) that I still enjoy. My parents often took me and my sister to the natural history museums all across the country where we got a much better view of the history of our planet than most kids our age.
To say that I replaced one belief with another would be false and to say I believed science had the same meaning for me that religion has for other people would also be false; unless you mean from a totally informational standpoint, which would be saying that religions were simply stories made up to explain natural phenomena.
I currently believe that science best explains the workings of the world we live in and it jives with my personal experiences. The god assumption never made any sense to me, and still doesn’t.
Later |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Meme Wars  I can enter The Chamber

Joined: 03 Jan 2003
Posts: 74
Gender: 
|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 8:55 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Science and Atheism:
Count me in as a lover of science! I do believe this to be a common them among heathens, though some born to atheist parents may not have needed the assistance of science for their point of view.
Even without science, I would have drifted to non-belief for moral reasons. It is astounding to me how indifferent believers are to the statement "what you believe is an accident of where you were born." Not only is this a revealing eye opener, but if there is some kind of god, how immoral this is that those of good fortune to accidentally believe the right thing goes to heaven while the other 66 to 90 percent of this world wind up in hell! There's a hell of a lot of good people in those other lands who believe differently and I find the whole concept morally repugnant and incoherent.
In order to clarify my beliefs after getting out of the Air Force where I was subjected to many belief systems (and none), I spent the next 4 years reading two chapters of the Bible from cover to cover every day. The god commanded genocides, inconsistency in philosophical concepts, conflicting history and testimony left me cold and agnostic toward the whole enterprise. The book only made sense if I see it as a morally evolving civilization rather than a perfect god handing down text for the commoners to read and obey. I realized then that morality was indeed separate from religion, and that both religions and gods could be held to the standards of how they treat people and given a pass or fail grade.
So even without science, I would have eventually turned away from religion from both a philosophical and moral standpoint.
Monty Vonn |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
LanDroid  Senior Silver Contributor


Joined: 27 Jul 2002
Posts: 384
Gender: 
Location: Cincinnati, OH

|
Posted: Sun Dec 23, 2007 11:11 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
Meme Wars reminded me of my earliest inclinations towards atheism. I was brought up in a somewhat religious household, then my dad got into a bit of fundamentalism. I remember in high school reading the Bible thinking it was the literal word of God. Then I came across a sentence in the New Testament "Women shall remain silent in the church". Un-oh, an error. How can the word of God contain errors? Ironically, reading the Bible was the beginning, not science. However, joining BookTalk and reading Sagan's Demon Haunted World re-ignited my interest in this subject.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris OConnor  Rhodes Scholar BookTalk.org Owner

Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 6849
Gender: 
Location: Florida

|
Posted: Mon Dec 24, 2007 9:10 pm Post subject:
|
|
|
| Carl Sagan's Cosmos was extremely influential for me too. But just plain thinking was what I think led me towards atheism. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
camsquirrel Getting comfortable
Joined: 18 Nov 2007
Posts: 8
Gender: 
|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 6:17 am Post subject:
|
|
|
| Chris OConnor wrote: |
| Carl Sagan's Cosmos was extremely influential for me too. But just plain thinking was what I think led me towards atheism. |
I agree, Chris. But until Cosmos I had no framework for my rather unformed thoughts and feelings. Cosmos basically let me think "THAT'S why I believe that!!" It gave me the labels that allowed me to explain it to myself and others, and it was after Cosmos that I applied the label "Atheist" to myself. Even growing up in Europe, there was no one around me who was using any language or any framework other than the religious to explain the metaphysical, and the language itself is somewhat lacking in that regard, so I was kind of spinning in a vacuum until Carl Sagan came along and basically let me know that I was all right. In particular, the episode on Johannes Kepler made a deep impression on me, and Sagan's humour in talking about astrology ("Mars is a lot bigger, but the obstetrician is a lot closer") pretty much showed me the way.
By the way, has anyone else here read Contact? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Pessimistic  Assistant Professor Silver Contributor


Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 3449
Gender: 
Location: NJ - www.myspace.com/mrpessimistic

|
Posted: Wed Dec 26, 2007 10:08 am Post subject:
|
|
|
[quote="camsquirre
By the way, has anyone else here read Contact?[/quote]
Never read it, but I want to. I saw the film.
Mr. P. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Recent Topics |
|
|
|