Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME FORUMS BLOGS BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Feb 12, 2012 6:59 am




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 120 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Women should be seen but not heard 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Book Nut

Bronze Contributor

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 88
Location: =D
Highscores: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 5 times in 4 posts
Gender: None specified

Post 
Wow. CWT36, that article had my stomach churning.

I was raised in a Catholic family and my parents never taught me to be submissive. So, it's always surprising to me when the Bible instructs women to submit (though, I think it should be said that I've never read the entirety of the Bible). But then, my parents let me have free reign over what I read and were very okay with me believing different things than what the Church teaches.



Tue Oct 27, 2009 4:59 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Banned

Banned
Diamond Contributor

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4141
Location: Florida
Thanks: 121
Thanked: 143 times in 133 posts
Gender: Male

Post 
CWT36 wrote:
Following are excerpts from the article Biblical Battered Wife Syndrome: Christian Women and Domestic Violence By Kathryn Joyce January 22, 2009.

Anybody who thinks submission doesn’t inherently breed violence should read the full article. I started reading it while I was having lunch but had to stop because my stomach started boiling.

These women are indoctrinated from when they are little girls to submit, it’s a culture of oppression that needs to stop.

http://www.religiondispatches.org/archi ... c_violence


Quote:
As teaching pastor Tom Holladay explains, spousal abuse should be dealt with by temporary separation and church marriage counseling designed to bring about reconciliation between the couple. But to qualify for that separation, your spouse must be in the “habit of beating you regularly,” and not be simply someone who “grabbed you once.”

*****

Andersen writes from personal experience, describing an episode of being held hostage by her husband—an associate pastor in their Kansas Baptist church—for close to twenty hours after he’d nearly fractured her skull. Andersen was raised in the Southern Baptist Convention, where she heard an unremitting message of “submission, submission, submission.” She saw this continual focus reflected in her ex-husband’s denunciations, while he detained her, of women who wanted to “rule over men.” Though Andersen was rescued by her church’s pastor, who had his assistant pastor arrested himself, she says other churchwomen aren’t so lucky, particularly when churches tell couples to attend joint marriage counseling under lay ministry leaders with no specific training for abuse survivors, who instead offer an unswerving prescription of submission and headship, often telling women to learn to submit “better.”

*****

In June 2007, professor of Christian theology at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary Bruce Ware told a Texas church that women often bring abuse on themselves by refusing to submit. And Debi Pearl, half of a husband-and-wife fundamentalist child-training ministry as well as author of the bestselling submission manual, Created to Be His Help Meet, writes that submission is so essential to God’s plan that it must be followed even to the point of allowing abuse. “When God puts you in subjection to a man whom he knows is going to cause you to suffer,” she writes, “it is with the understanding that you are obeying God by enduring the wrongful suffering.”

*****
“We know from small studies in Christian contexts, as well as from a great deal of clinical and pastoral experience that domestic abuse is prevalent in Christian contexts,” says Roberts, adding that research has found that Christian women often stay in abusive situations several years longer than secular abused women.


:furious:

My response at 13:00
Your quote is from a biased website and its impartiality if not its voracity is highly susptect. I have been associated with conservative SB churches for more than three decades and every one of them advises that at the first sign of physical abuse the abused spouse should seek shelter, and absolutely not stay in an abusive relationship. There is nothing scriptural about being abused and it is grounds for divorce.

1430
I subsequently researched the situation and am posting what I found out.
I am probably about as conservative a Christian as you will ever meet and while I ascribe to the Biblical priciple that a wife submits to her husband, in the 29 years that I have been married, it has never been an issue. Not that my wife blindly does what I tell her, I don't believe that is what submission is intended to be. I checked the story out and the below is what I found. I will point out that a great deal of shock was registered by the Christian community and directed toward Saddlebrook. They subsequently took the audio post of the teaching off the website and Pastor Halladay claimed he comments had been edited in a way which left a wrong impression of what he meant. I cannot address that but I will say that I have never been impressed with that Saddlebrook or Rick Warren. His is kind of a guru of the new evengelical church, the seeker friendly church. His book, A Purpose Drive Life is a best seller and has spawned a whole industry of study materials and seminars. Our church had a 13 week series studying the book. I went to a couple but I thought the book was pretty much a bunch of babble. It might surprise those of you who read my posts to discover that I frequently don't agree with people and that isn't restricted to atheists.

"Saddleback removes audio clip saying abuse no excuse for divorce
By Bob Allen
Thursday, July 09, 2009
LAKE FOREST, Calif. (ABP) -- A senior staff member of Rick Warren's Saddleback Church, quoted earlier this year as teaching the Bible does not permit a woman to divorce an abusive husband, has said the audio clip containing the comment gave the wrong impression about his views and has been removed from the church website.

In January Associated Baptist Press and several blogs quoted audio clips from a "Bible Questions & Answers" section of Saddleback's website in which Tom Holladay, the church's teaching pastor, said the Bible condones divorce for only two reasons: infidelity and abandonment.

"I wish there were a third [reason for divorce] in Scripture, having been involved as a pastor with situations of abuse," Holladay said. "There is something in me that wishes there were a Bible verse that says, 'If they abuse you in this-and-such kind of way, then you have a right to leave them.'"

What the clip didn't make clear, Holladay said recently, is the question he was answering had to do with abusive language and not physical abuse. The way it was edited, Holladay said, gave the impression that a chronically violent and abusive situation is the only just cause for separation.

"We believe that one violent incident is obviously more than enough to demand the need for a separation," Holladay said in a statement to church members. "This has always been the advice that we give."
Holladay said "in an attempt to explain the difference between an angry exchange between spouses and domestic violence, I used words that seemed -- especially when taken out of context -- that I believe a long term multiply violent situation is the only cause for a separation."

"That is not what I and we believe or advise," he said. "Instead, we advise that in a domestic violence situation the first step is to get immediately to safety. I apologize for a poor choice of words that made it seem in any way that we do not advise this."
Holladay said Saddleback believes that God can restore a marriage in which abuse has occurred, but if an abusive spouse refuses to repent and try to change, there eventually comes a point at which he or she has abandoned the marriage and it cannot be saved.

Danni Moss, a pseudonymous blogger who transcribed and commented about Holladay's original comment in January, said many evangelical ministries counsel victims of domestic violence in ways that are unbiblical and dangerous. For example, she she noted, some pastors teach that a woman should stay with an unbelieving and abusive husband in hopes that it might help lead him to Christ.

She pointed to FamilyLife, an organization led by Southern Baptist Dennis Rainey, which recently published an article that extolled "suffering in marriage for the sake of righteousness."

Diana Garland, dean of the Baylor University School of Social Work, said church leaders should not attempt to deal alone with family violence, but immediately seek assistance from family professionals and call police if anyone has been hurt or seems to be in danger of being hurt.

Garland urged pastors to provide a framework for all families to understand family violence.

"Church leaders can help by preaching and teaching about the sin of violence which breaks out in family homes and the abuse of power from which it springs," Garland wrote in her 1999 book Family Ministry: A Comprehensive Guide. "Because abusers often convince abused family members that they have a duty to forgive, teaching about forgiveness, repentance and restoration often can be enormously helpful to hidden victims of family violence in a congregation."

Garland said restoring a marriage broken by abuse involves not only forgiveness but also repentance.

"Many women stay and suffer abuse silently and unbeknownst to church leaders, precisely because they take their commitment seriously," she said. "Seldom does it occur to them that the covenant has already been broken by the violence itself."

She said any chance for restoration depends on "serious repentance" by the abuser, along with "consistent participation" in an abuser-treatment program.

Garland said the second half of Malachi 2:16, which quotes God as saying "I hate divorce," sometimes gets overlooked in evangelical domestic-abuse conseling. The verse also adds, "and covering one's garment with violence."

"An abused mate who continues to be abused cannot forgive the abuser, because she is herself as imprisoned by the abuse as he is," Garland said. "She can only forgive him when she is free herself. She can only forgive him when she has the option of holding him accountable."

"That is why God is ultimately the source of forgiveness," she said, "because only God has the power to hold us ultimately accountable."
-30-
Bob Allen is senior writer for Associated Baptist Press.
http://www.abpnews.com/index.php?option ... &Itemid=53

A Look at Saddleback's Position on Domestic Violence from a Former Member
Tags: domestic violence, marriage, rick warren, saddleback church, sheri ferber, tom holladay
May 19, 2009 6:40 AM | 1 Comment | No TrackBacks
On Sunday afternoons, Sheri Ferber, a 43-year-old mother of three, listens online to Rick Warren's sermons, streamed from the 25,000-member Saddleback Church where she was a devoted member for ten years.


Although Sheri, pictured here, now lives an hour away in Temecula, California, she hangs on the weekly sermons like a woman in exile. It's the closest she gets to church these days.

Ferber is a petite strawberry-blonde with a pretty, round-cheeked face, and a voice that sometimes sounds hesitant. Four years ago, she approached a Saddleback pastor for protection against her husband, who'd violently attacked her while they were driving home from church. Instead of protecting her, Ferber says, the pastor called her husband to warn him that Ferber had been "gossiping about their marriage." Ferber, it seems, had run into Saddleback's teaching that the sanctity of marriage prohibits divorce in all but a few circumstances, and domestic violence is not one of them. Abused wives could separate from their husbands, Teaching Pastor Tom Holladay explained in audio clips once available on the church website, but only with the intent to reconcile through church counseling.

"There's something in me that wishes there was a Bible verse that says if they abuse you in this and such kind of way then you can leave them," said Holladay, but sadly, he concluded, there wasn't. "It's not like you can escape the pain," he said, since the "short-term solution" of divorce leaves the "long-term pain" of a failed marriage. Holladay further qualified that domestic abuse meant regular beatings, not simply a spouse who "grabbed you once."

The clips were removed from the website this spring, in the months after Warren, the casual-Friday face of "new Evangelicals," spoke at President Barack Obama's inauguration. But the underlying problems have not disappeared. Like many conservative churches, particularly fellow Southern Baptist churches, Saddleback teaches a traditional view of gender roles in marriage, where wives submit to husbands' protection and leadership. Supporters say that in many cases this Christian model of marriage, known as "complementarianism," can work out well, for both men and women. But in cases where the husband is prone to hitting, experts warn, the teachings can be disastrous: encouraging the abuser and shaming wives into thinking they can't report the abuse and still be right with God.

Saddleback styles itself as an update to the hidebound American conservative church. Warren is known for his Hawaiian print shirts and approachability. His bestselling book, The Purpose Driven Life, is pitched at upwardly mobile Evangelicals, and Saddleback's "mutual submission" teachings are less authoritarian than strict fundamentalist readings. "The Holy Spirit establishes the husband as the spiritual leader of the home, yet he is not to be domineering," the website explains. "The wife is to be respectful and submissive, but is not to be considered a doormat." As such, Saddleback seems a vanguard of new, upwardly mobile American Evangelicals, who are wealthier, better educated and, a 2006 study proposed, more happily married than the rest of the country.

In general, women in traditional Evangelical marriages report greater levels of satisfaction with their husbands' emotional engagement and domestic help than do more progressive working women, according to W. Bradford Wilcox, a University of Virginia sociologist and author of Soft Patriarchs and New Men: How Christianity Shapes Fathers and Husbands. Men in these marriages, says Wilcox, are less likely than other men to become abusive. But this is only true if they are regular churchgoers. "Born again" men who attend church sporadically are actually among the most likely abusers, just as they are the most likely to be divorced, or not living with their children. For these less committed churchgoers, teaching the same lessons about gender roles and the importance of saving marriages at almost any cost can have dangerous consequences.

Church attendance rates alone don't explain the problem of abuse in Evangelical churches, however. Instead, the fundamental attitudes of the church towards marriage roles can exacerbate the dynamics of abuse. Jocelyn Andersen, author of Woman Submit! Christians and Domestic Violence, was severely battered by her assistant pastor husband. She argues that submission teachings don't create abusers, but allow violent men to justify their abuse as biblical. The real danger, though, is in how the teachings impact devout women, who may conclude they can't leave their marriages and remain committed Christians. Nancy Nason-Clark, a sociologist at the University of New Brunswick who studies religion and violence, says that while domestic violence rates are consistent in and out of church, Christian women stay much longer, and in much more violent situations, than do non-Christians. "When a religious woman is victimized by her partner, she's in some ways more vulnerable--not to the abuse, but to feeling that she should stick it out, and stick to the church for help. She's more likely to blame herself, to think that if she's better, the suffering will end." Barbara Roberts, author of Not Under Bondage: Biblical Divorce for Abuse, Adultery and Desertion, adds that many churches "inadvertently become enlisted into the agenda of abusers" by promoting reconciliation between victims and unreformed abusers.

In the audio clips, Holladay took care to explain that enduring abuse is not part of biblical submission. But the church does teach, he told me, "that with Jesus' help, all marriages can be reconciled. Why should we be in business if we don't believe that?"

Ferber was introduced to her ex-husband, Mark Bradley, by his mother, Charlotte Huntington, a Saddleback choir staffer who became Ferber's spiritual mentor. Bradley wasn't a Saddleback member, but attended the nearby Life Church, a Pentecostal body where he was active in the music ministry. At first, they talked late into the night, reading Scripture and composing their own Christian lyrics. Within four years they married. Right before their wedding, Bradley told Ferber to say goodbye to her choir fellows, as he'd asked her to quit. She saw the prospect of submitting to her husband as a bittersweet "graduation" to a new phase of life.

Ten months into the marriage, they were driving along a winding road from Saddleback to Life Church. Bradley had had a conflict with a Saddleback member who'd worked on his car. Ferber had paid Bradley's debt, and in the car she asked him about the money. Suddenly, she says, he became violent, jabbing her temple with his finger, telling her to "shut the f--- up," and then stopped the car and bashed her head against the passenger window until she threw a cup of water at him.

In the following weeks, Ferber confided the abuse to an older couple she knew from choir. Following proper protocol at Saddleback, the couple pulled in Tom Atkins, Ferber's small group leader and a friend of Huntington's. When Ferber began to tell Atkins what happened, she says, he raised a hand and told her, "Stop talking." Soon after, Bradley called her, giggling, and said, "I hear from Tom you've been running your mouth." He reported that Atkins had told him: "Mark, I ran into your wife the other day. I stopped her from gossiping about your marriage."

In an e-mail, Atkins stressed that he couldn't comment on Ferber's allegations because of pastoral confidentiality obligations. In a phone interview, Tom Holladay and another church pastor, Bob Baker, head of Saddleback's pastoral care ministry, said they were similarly bound by confidentiality, but acknowledged that Ferber's claims about Atkins would run counter to church policy if true. "If you're asking if that's the right response," said Holladay, "it would be inconsistent with how we do things." Neither Bradley nor Huntington responded to interview requests.

Ferber confesses that initially, she conspired with the church in minimizing the abuse, and trying to reconcile with her husband. As a core member of Saddleback, Ferber had absorbed the church's message that divorce was almost never an option. She called the church prayer line, and was told that she and her husband should attend church marriage counseling, at first under Atkins and his wife, then under a lay couple in the marriage ministry.

In the counseling sessions, Ferber was stopped whenever she tried to discuss the assault, she says, and told that she should learn to "sweeten her words," and not make Bradley feel "backed into a corner." Although they were no longer living together, sometimes she let him stay the night. Wives, she believed, had a duty to share their bodies with their husbands. One night, Bradley asked if he could come over and she said "No." He called her back and demanded she read him a biblical passage, 1 Corinthians 7:4: "The wife's body does not belong to her alone, but also to her husband." Bradley filed for divorce the next day. Soon after, Ferber discovered she was pregnant.

The prospect of a baby spurred Ferber to self-defense, and, 11 months after the attack, she filed a police report. Months later, Bradley was convicted of two felony counts of assault and received 60 days of jail time, fines, three years of formal probation and a one-mile restraining order.

Ferber describes what followed at Saddleback as a slow freeze. Unlike other expectant mothers, she received little church support. Bradley, not formerly a church member, began singing at the front of the choir. Ferber reminded Bob Baker that she had a restraining order against Bradley and asked how to handle Bradley's sudden prominence in the church, but she never got a satisfying answer. Baker told me that Saddleback policy is to divide church access between both parties of a restraining order, but give the victim priority. But Ferber claims that Saddleback barred her from Sunday morning services and the several weeknights that her ministry groups met.

For four years, Ferber pled her case with various Saddleback staffers. But "every door that would seem to open would slam shut," she told me. Eventually, she left Orange County, but hears from former church fellows that her ex-husband is now an official worship leader. (Saddleback confirms him only as a member of the music ministry. During our discussion, Holladay did not speak specifically about Bradley but said generally that domestic violence would "obviously" be grounds for dismissal for a Saddleback ministry member.) Though neither Holladay nor Baker would get into details, Holladay gently dismissed Ferber's story. "People begin to feel things after what happened," he says."I don't think I can sit here and call her a liar. I don't know what she's been through and is going through. As a church, our goal is healing. It might make her feel good to see her story in a newspaper. It might make her feel bad--depending on how you report it. It doesn't sound untrue to me, but you're obviously hearing one side of the story, and it sounds like someone's added a layer of hurt. We don't want to go down roads that would hurt this person more."

Brenda Branson, co-author of Violence Among Us--Ministry to Families in Crisis, calls Ferber's story "sadly typical." When Branson sought help over her youth minister husband's violence, one pastor told her not to make prayer requests about her marital troubles, and another told her to go home, "cook him his very favorite meal," and be more quiet and understanding. "I did cook his favorite meal, and try to be very sensitive," Branson says. "That happened to be the night my husband picked up a chair and hit me with it."

Some conservative churches push submission teachings to an uncomfortable degree. In 2008, Southern Baptist Theological Seminary professor Bruce Ware said that when male headship is challenged by women seeking to "have their way, instead of submitting to their husbands," husbands may "respond to that threat to their authority" by becoming abusive. James Dobson argued in his marital therapy book, Love Must Be Tough, that abused women shouldn't divorce but separate and try to change their husbands' behavior. He also warned against women who bait men into abuse to gain the "prize" of bruises to display. In 2007, popular Pentecostal televangelist Juanita Bynum was badly beaten by her estranged pastor husband, Bishop Thomas W. Weeks III, during an attempted reconciliation meeting at an Atlanta hotel. Bynum made domestic violence a priority of her ministry after the attack, and was subsequently condemned as "an angry, out-of-control woman" by conservative radio preacher Jesse Lee Peterson.

Ferber now lives with her three children, including her and Bradley's son, now four, whom Bradley has never come to meet. She struggles to make ends selling natural health products from her home, and has neither filed for child support nor joined another church--a phenomenon Branson says is common among devout women whose stories are doubted. "They are truly people without a country," she says.

Ferber had originally come to Saddleback seeking healing from an unstable childhood. "I leaned my entire weight on the church," she says. "What a family it was to me." Ironically, the family that stuck by her wasn't Saddleback, but Bradley's Life Church, which responded swiftly to the abuse by pulling Bradley from leadership and later accompanying Ferber to court: something Ferber attributes to the difference between Baptist and Pentecostal approaches to women's roles in the church.

Since her divorce, Ferber has become friends with Bradley's first wife, Angela Jackson, a 40-year-old mother of four who works in Atlanta as both a realtor and teacher. Jackson suffered far more sustained abuse during her marriage to Bradley than had Ferber, though few in her church believed her. When she visited a doctor after Bradley beat her around the face, x-rays showed her head had become completely lopsided from the blows. The two women hope to create a ministry to teach churches to respond to domestic violence better than did theirs. Yet on Sunday afternoons, both listen online to the sermons of the churches they've left.

Saddleback is now launching a revamped 30-week domestic violence program for victims. Saddleback's new policy is to advise unilateral legal separation in any unsafe spousal abuse cases and police intervention, so that, Baker says, "victims [are put] in the position where they have to get help." Marriage counseling is no longer the first option, and a program for abusers is anticipated by year's end.

It's unclear how much of this approach is new since Ferber sought help, or since Saddleback was criticized for Tom Holladay's divorce teachings, but Holladay is clearly responding to public reproofs when he apologizes for "phrases that make it sound like abuse is [only] repeated beatings. We don't believe that." But the church hasn't changed its emphasis on reconciling all marriages as a first priority. And it hasn't much changed its attitude towards victims, either. In January, Ferber called Saddleback again, and was directed to Bob Baker, who offered to discuss her "making amends" with the church, meaning essentially, she could apologize.

When we first spoke, Ferber asked if I was a Christian. When I told her I wasn't, it gave her great pause, as she considered the negative impact of discussing church problems with outsiders. "To a degree, this is a family matter," she said. "And I'm not trying to air our dirty laundry. Pastor Rick handed me my life and I'm forever grateful for what he taught me. But for them to reject me like that, when I did nothing wrong...They couldn't stop the abuse, but they could have helped me. When they say 'get over it,' you have to know what the 'it' is: for me, it wasn't the abuse from my husband, it was the abuse from the church."

Source: Double X
http://blackchristiannews.com/news/2009 ... ember.html"

I suspect that Sheri's story is correct and fairly accurate. I have known some churches which impose a level of oversight on their members which seems unhealthy and unscriptural to me. Using scripture as a basis for abusing anyone is unconscionable.



Last edited by stahrwe on Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Wed Oct 28, 2009 11:38 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Sophomore


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 266
Location: Riverhead, Long Island
Thanks: 3
Thanked: 6 times in 5 posts
Gender: Male

Post 
stahrwe wrote:
[Your quote is from a biased website and its impartiality if not its voracity is highly susptect. I have been associated with conservative SB churches for more than three decades and every one of them advises that at the first sign of physical abuse the abused spouse should seek shelter, and absolutely not stay in an abusive relationship. There is nothing scriptural about being abused and it is grounds for divorce.


Yes I guess since the article was written by a woman who suffered abuse at the hands of her minister husband, that could be biased. Maybe we should ask the abuser to explain why he .... oh wait, we don't need to do that. We already know why he did it.

Is Christian Ethics Today biased?

http://www.christianethicstoday.com/cet ... &ArtID=973

Quote:
Bruce Ware, professor of Christian theology at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, KY, actually does know why husbands abuse their wives.
But he is confused and just doesn’t realize that he knows: “And husbands on their parts, because they’re sinners, now respond to that threat to their authority either by being abusive, which is of course one of the ways men can respond when their authority is challenged—or, more commonly, to become passive, acquiescent, and simply not asserting the leadership they ought to as men in their homes and in churches,” Ware said recently from the pulpit of Denton Bible Church in Denton, Texas.
So, according to Ware, there are two options for men in response to women who assert their rights to be free and equal partners in marriage: beat them up or become passive, i.e. a wimp. Society condones the first and abhors the second. I think this is why we have abuse in marriages, Ware concludes.
In his confusion, Dr. Ware prefaces this insight with the opinion that the problem begins with women who ‘rebel’ against their husbands who have been given authority over them by God. So once again in blaming the victim, Dr. Ware misses his own insight.
Ware’s conclusion is quite limited: “He will have to rule, and because he’s a sinner, this can happen in one of two ways. It can happen either through ruling that is abusive and oppressive—and of course we all know the horrors of that and the ugliness of that—but here’s the other way in which he can respond when his authority is threatened. He can acquiesce. He can become passive. He can give up any responsibility that he thought he had to be the leader in the relationship and just say, ‘OK dear,’ ‘Whatever you say dear,’ ‘Fine dear’ and become a passive husband, because of sin.”
Talk about dichotomous thinking. Actually, there is a third option for men and women in heterosexual marriage. What about those thousands of marriages that I know, like my parents’ for fifty years, where two adults stand side by side as equal partners, faithful to each other and their children, living out Gospel values everyday?
What we have here is a professor of theology who clearly knows nothing about wife abuse and domestic violence and someone who is willing to expend enormous energy blaming battered women and excusing batterers with a high gloss, labored theological rationalization.
The “sin” is “that he [male humans] will have to rule,” i.e. the man’s desire to rule over and dominate another human being and his willingness to use force and violence to accomplish this. (I suggest that Dr. Ware reread Genesis 1 and Galatians 3:28 and anything written by Dr. Catherine Clark Kroeger.[2]
Finally, Ware worries that the “egalitarian” view—the notion that males and females were created equal not only in essence but also in function—crops up in churches that allow women to be ordained and become pastors. Praise God! Don’t even get me started on this one.


How about EthicsDaily.com, are they biased?

http://www.ethicsdaily.com/news.php?viewStory=12832

Quote:
One reason that men abuse their wives is because women rebel against their husband's God-given authority, a Southern Baptist scholar said Sunday in a Texas church.

Bruce Ware, professor of Christian theology at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Ky., said women desire to have their own way instead of submitting to their husbands because of sin.

*****

"It means that a woman will demonstrate that she is in fact a Christian, that she has submitted to God's ways by affirming and embracing her God-designed identity as--for the most part, generally this is true--as wife and mother, rather than chafing against it, rather than bucking against it, rather than wanting to be a man, wanting to be in a man's position, wanting to teach and exercise authority over men," Ware said. "Rather than wanting that, she accepts and embraces who she is as woman, because she knows God and she knows his ways are right and good, so she is marked as a Christian by her submission to God and in that her acceptance of God's design for her as a woman."


Is MainStreetBaptists.org biased?

http://www.mainstreambaptists.org/mbn/s ... _women.htm

Quote:
The Pressler-Patterson coalition’s subjugation of women extended to the privacy of Baptist homes when a statement on the family was added to the BF&M. In line with the chain of command made explicit in the 1984 resolution, the 1998 family amendment advised wives that they must “graciously submit” to their husbands.
The unconditional nature of the wife’s subjugation became clear at the official press conference following the statement’s adoption. Dorothy Patterson, wife of Paige Patterson and a member of the committee that drafted the family statement, said, “When it comes to submitting to my husband even when he is wrong, I just do it. He is accountable to God.”

*****

These and other recent instances of the SBC’s subjugation of women have led many women to question how they can continue to conscientiously support a denomination so opposed to their values.


The position of the SBC is wrong, dead wrong, and the SBC is as complicit in the abuse that these women suffer as if they were hitting the women themselves.

The SBC has poured gasoline over every woman in it's congregations and handed each man a lighter, ignoring the fact that they have arsonists in their pews

No, I'm not saying every Baptist man is a wife beater. The ubiquitous problem is much more subtle, but is oppressive and degrading to all women.

Requiring women to be submissive is indefensible; but of course, you will defend it. That's what you do.


_________________
-Colin

"Do not tell fish stories where the people know you; but particularly, don't tell them where they know the fish." -Mark Twain


Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:14 pm
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Book Nut

Bronze Contributor

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 88
Location: =D
Highscores: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 5 times in 4 posts
Gender: None specified

Post 
Quote:
What the clip didn't make clear, Holladay said recently, is the question he was answering had to do with abusive language and not physical abuse.


I'm sorry, this stood out to me so much because abusive language can be just as harmful as physical and as good a reason for leaving a bad marriage. I've known plenty of women who have suffered from the hands of emotional abusers and it is never a pretty situation. Sometimes counseling can work and the couple can move on but a majority of the time, that abuser will go to counseling maybe once. Or twice and then say he's changed when really, he'll go back to the abuse.

Also, a lot of relationships that start out with emotional abuse will transfer to physical.



Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:29 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Booktastic!

BookTalk.org Moderator
Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3676
Images: 3
Location: California
Highscores: 1
Thanks: 345
Thanked: 735 times in 551 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Stahre:

Quote:
I am probably about as conservative a Christian as you will ever meet and while I ascribe to the Biblical priciple that a wife submits to her husband...


:gun: :pop:



Wed Oct 28, 2009 2:36 pm
Profile Personal album
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Worthy of Worship

BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2003
Location: New Jersey
Highscores: 84
Thanks: 277
Thanked: 246 times in 200 posts
Gender: Female
Country: United States (us)

Post 
The Ritzy wrote:
Quote:
Also, a lot of relationships that start out with emotional abuse will transfer to physical.


I think this is very true. Abusers rely on low self esteem. I also believe that abusers themselves suffer from low self esteem. A woman in a relationship where she feels inferior is an easy target for physical abuse.

I would think it would be terribly unsatisfying to be married to someone who is perceived to be somehow inferior.

I also think it is sad that some men feel the need to bolster their own self esteem, or sense of importance by abusing their wives, or treating them as inferior. I also agree, verbal attacks are destructive. For a marriage to last, there needs to be respect, and respect goes both ways.


_________________
I feel like a wet seed wild in the hot blind earth.
--William Faulkner


Wed Oct 28, 2009 5:50 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Banned

Banned
Diamond Contributor

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4141
Location: Florida
Thanks: 121
Thanked: 143 times in 133 posts
Gender: Male

Post 
Interbane wrote:
Stahre:

Quote:
I am probably about as conservative a Christian as you will ever meet and while I ascribe to the Biblical priciple that a wife submits to her husband...


:gun: :pop:


Are you advocating violence against me?

I asked my wife last night what it means to be submissive. She didn't know. I asked her if she thinks a wife should be submissive to her husband. She said yes. I asked her in what way she is submissive to me. Her answer was that she doesn't throw away all my junk.



Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:47 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Banned

Banned
Diamond Contributor

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4141
Location: Florida
Thanks: 121
Thanked: 143 times in 133 posts
Gender: Male

Post 
Interbane wrote:
Quote:
Bart is a turtle, I don't think he should quote me unless he is willing to explain the mistakes on his blog.


Here is an excellent case of denial. I've shown you why it is you who are wrong and not Bart. Under what pretense do you deny that this is the case? Do you honestly believe his Anne Frank quote pulled you out of context, or that 'presidents' cannot be a category? This is denial, you're guilty.


The way Bart quoted me on his blog was almost indecipherable. He said this is a quote from Stahrwe but the entire thing was in [ ] which represents things not present.

He has also made numerous factual errors in his blog, some minor, some major.

Presidents certainly is a category but it does not include vice presidents. That is a separate category. If you are asked on a test to list all of the presidents of the United States you would lose points if you included vice presidents.

Please stop being silly.



Thu Oct 29, 2009 8:56 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Addict

BookTalk.org Moderator

Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 2264
Images: 6
Location: Michigan
Thanks: 776
Thanked: 573 times in 414 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Quote:
I asked her in what way she is submissive to me. Her answer was that she doesn't throw away all my junk.


haha. nice.


_________________
Have you tried that? Looking for answers?
Or have you been content to be terrified of a thing you know nothing about?

Nowhere in the Bible does it state that the truth would be revealed through logic and evidence.
-James Williamson MD

Science flies you to the moon. Religion flies you into buildings.

In the absence of God, I found Man.
-Guillermo Del Torro

If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.
-Derek Bok


Thu Oct 29, 2009 10:14 am
Profile Personal album
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Worthy of Worship

BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2003
Location: New Jersey
Highscores: 84
Thanks: 277
Thanked: 246 times in 200 posts
Gender: Female
Country: United States (us)

Post 
stahrwe wrote:
Quote:
I asked my wife last night what it means to be submissive. She didn't know. I asked her if she thinks a wife should be submissive to her husband. She said yes.


How can anyone choose to behave in a certain manor without knowing what the word means?

A wife who does not know what submissiveness is, does not choose this lifestyle, she is told to live this way. Submissiveness, means to be obedient and passive and dutiful, it’s meekness and compliance. I would expect this in a two year old, or perhaps a slave, not a spouse.


_________________
I feel like a wet seed wild in the hot blind earth.
--William Faulkner


Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:40 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Banned

Banned
Diamond Contributor

Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 4141
Location: Florida
Thanks: 121
Thanked: 143 times in 133 posts
Gender: Male

Post 
Suzanne wrote:
stahrwe wrote:
Quote:
I asked my wife last night what it means to be submissive. She didn't know. I asked her if she thinks a wife should be submissive to her husband. She said yes.


How can anyone choose to behave in a certain manor without knowing what the word means?

A wife who does not know what submissiveness is, does not choose this lifestyle, she is told to live this way. Submissiveness, means to be obedient and passive and dutiful, it’s meekness and compliance. I would expect this in a two year old, or perhaps a slave, not a spouse.


I think you missed the point. Marriage is not a war between a man and woman, it is a relationship. The Bible says that when we marry the husband and wife become one flesh. Two become one. In some part of that the individuals remain, but it is a perversion if one or the other asserts their individuality in an abusive manner.

My daugher has been in an abusive marriage and the first thing I told her was to move out.



Thu Oct 29, 2009 1:57 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
I issue my own library cards!

Gold Contributor 2

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1741
Images: 1
Location: NC
Thanks: 353
Thanked: 425 times in 314 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Suzanne wrote:

A wife who does not know what submissiveness is, does not choose this lifestyle, she is told to live this way. Submissiveness, means to be obedient and passive and dutiful, it’s meekness and compliance. I would expect this in a two year old, or perhaps a slave, not a spouse.


My opinion: Men who have to have submissive wives aren't real men. I have always thought this true of the Muslim world where the men insist that women hide themselves in burkas and women will be punished, even killed, for going out in public unattended. It's no wonder the Muslim feel threatened by western style democracy which promotes equality of the sexes. The biblical notion of submissiveness is the same, just one more example of antiquated ideology adopted by insecure men. The world moves on and fundamentalists, be they Christian or Muslim, respond the only way they know how, by becoming increasingly insular and outside the mainstream.


_________________
-Geo
Question Everything


Last edited by geo on Thu Oct 29, 2009 4:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.



Thu Oct 29, 2009 2:32 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Sophomore


Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 266
Location: Riverhead, Long Island
Thanks: 3
Thanked: 6 times in 5 posts
Gender: Male

Post 
stahrwe wrote:
Suzanne wrote:
stahrwe wrote:
Quote:
I asked my wife last night what it means to be submissive. She didn't know. I asked her if she thinks a wife should be submissive to her husband. She said yes.


How can anyone choose to behave in a certain manor without knowing what the word means?

A wife who does not know what submissiveness is, does not choose this lifestyle, she is told to live this way. Submissiveness, means to be obedient and passive and dutiful, it’s meekness and compliance. I would expect this in a two year old, or perhaps a slave, not a spouse.


I think you missed the point. Marriage is not a war between a man and woman, it is a relationship. The Bible says that when we marry the husband and wife become one flesh. Two become one. In some part of that the individuals remain, but it is a perversion if one or the other asserts their individuality in an abusive manner.

My daugher has been in an abusive marriage and the first thing I told her was to move out.


Stah my ideological friend, I think it is you who are missing the point. No one said marriage is a war between a man and a woman. What is being said is that submissiveness is unhealthy for marriage, but more importantly it's unhealthy and potentially dangerous for women.

I'm going put aside my sarcasm and cynicism for a moment, and try to put this as respectfully as I can. I mentioned that the ubiquitous problem is very subtle. It's not far fetched that raising a young girl in a home where the wife is submissive, in a church where it is actively taught that women should be submissive, that a girl would develop a belief system that would make her susceptible to abuse. Most psychologists would tell you that we don't pick our partners by accident; for example it's common for the co-dependant to seek out the alcoholic. Girls with a certain faulty belief system seek out men who tend to be abusers. The root of the problem is subtle, but it is insidious.

The position of the SBC plants the seeds into young girls, and at the same time it is planting corresponding seeds in young boys. I know that the church doesn't condone, but rather speaks out against abuse. But simultaniously they are planting seeds of abuse. Just like real seeds, they won't all germinate. Many kids, most kids, will grow up with good healthy beliefs. But some seeds will germinate, and young girls and young boys grow up with faulty belief systems (unintentionally of course).

We know this happens, and yet the church fosters it just the same. Again, I want to be as careful and respectful as I can, but maybe some of those seeds germinated in your daughter. But whether they did or not, the mere possibility that it may be the case should have you adamantly opposed to the practice of submission.

Every young girl should be ingrained with the fact that she is never, never, never in any way less than a man. They need to be taught that there is no gray area, there is no "it's ok to be submissive in regards to the chores, but not in regards to your body." NO submission ever. Anything less is unacceptable and dangerous.


_________________
-Colin

"Do not tell fish stories where the people know you; but particularly, don't tell them where they know the fish." -Mark Twain


Thu Oct 29, 2009 3:30 pm
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Booktastic!

BookTalk.org Moderator
Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3676
Images: 3
Location: California
Highscores: 1
Thanks: 345
Thanked: 735 times in 551 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Quote:
If you are asked on a test to list all of the presidents of the United States you would lose points if you included vice presidents.

Please stop being silly.


No, you wouldn't lose points. Go to your conservapedia site, which is biased in your favor, and look under Presidents of the United States. It lists Vice Presidents. http://conservapedia.com/Presidents_of_ ... ted_States

I'm not being silly. The distinction is that it's not an error on Bart's part, as you claim it is. He could be more specific, sure. Did he err? No. You're wrong.

Quote:
Are you advocating violence against me?


Is that a rhetorical question to claim the moral high ground? No, I'm not advocating violence. What the emotes express is that words don't work that well in communicating with you. Even if you're wrong, you'll redefine the words just so you can be right. It's wrong to ascribe to any principle in which one person submits to another in what should be an equal relationship. You simply can't seem to understand this.



Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:13 pm
Profile Personal album
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membership
Book Nut

Bronze Contributor

Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 88
Location: =D
Highscores: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 5 times in 4 posts
Gender: None specified

Post 
stahrwe wrote:
Suzanne wrote:
stahrwe wrote:
Quote:
I asked my wife last night what it means to be submissive. She didn't know. I asked her if she thinks a wife should be submissive to her husband. She said yes.


How can anyone choose to behave in a certain manor without knowing what the word means?

A wife who does not know what submissiveness is, does not choose this lifestyle, she is told to live this way. Submissiveness, means to be obedient and passive and dutiful, it’s meekness and compliance. I would expect this in a two year old, or perhaps a slave, not a spouse.


I think you missed the point. Marriage is not a war between a man and woman, it is a relationship. The Bible says that when we marry the husband and wife become one flesh. Two become one. In some part of that the individuals remain, but it is a perversion if one or the other asserts their individuality in an abusive manner.

My daugher has been in an abusive marriage and the first thing I told her was to move out.
Being submissive and being of "one flesh" seem to be very different things to me. If I am submissive to someone, I am letting them control me. But if I am "one" with them, or in my mind, equal to my partner than I am not submissive.



Thu Oct 29, 2009 7:36 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 120 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:

Recent Posts 
Is evolutionary chance impossible?

Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:59 pm

ant

Did the man "Jesus" exist?

Sat Feb 11, 2012 10:32 pm

Robert Tulip

Blindness by Jose Saramago for next discussion?

Sat Feb 11, 2012 6:30 pm

Suzanne

A SPY AT HOME book trailer on YouTube!

Sat Feb 11, 2012 5:24 pm

readermark

Trying to get the hang of this

Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:41 pm

Suzanne

New member seeking to make friends

Sat Feb 11, 2012 12:36 pm

Suzanne

Can a scientist define Life?

Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:45 am

johnson1010

Life is chemistry

Sat Feb 11, 2012 9:26 am

johnson1010


BookTalk.org Links 
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Info for Authors & Publishers
Featured Book Suggestions
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!
    

Love to talk about books but don't have time for our book discussion forums? For casual book talk join us on Facebook.

Support BookTalk.org 
If you appreciate BookTalk.org please consider donating a few dollars to help keep us online. See who supports us.
Make a donation
RECENT DONATIONS:
• giselle - $50 January
• nomsisa - $50 September
• giselle - $50 September

Featured Books

Recent Blogging 

The 12th Disciple and Poor Richard's Downtown Colorado Springs

The 12th Disciple is now being stocked at Poor Richard's Bookstore in Colorado Springs. We're happy to have the title at such a historic location in Colorado Springs. If… more

Posted: 13 days ago
by 12th disciple

...

For most of us, a very big part of our lives will be a dark place, we wont realize it. We live, we eat, we have some fun, we go to school, we sleep. But it will come the time, when… more

Posted: 14 days ago
by aracelip7

Hello world!

Welcome to BookTalk.org Blogs. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

See those links at the very top of the page? To get into your control panel for… more

Posted: 15 days ago
by drewdamato

There's an election this year?

The 12th Disciple's endorsement for a Presidential Candidate...we'll pass. If many haven't learned over the past several decades, centuries, and millennia, the gover… more

Posted: 21 days ago
by 12th disciple

New Books

So I've been looking for new books to read, but I haven't found any that have caught my attention lately. I want to try and venture out into a different genre, but I'… more

Posted: 27 days ago
by spazzymagee

Unethical Apple

For those who constantly gripe about jobs being sent overseas, focus your anger on this. Read about how one of the most profitable companies prided by American citizens offshores t… more

Posted: 28 days ago
by vetwriter

Role of the Individual Augmentee in the Military

An article of mine regarding the role of the Individual Augmentee in the military has been published on Blogging Authors. Read the article at:

http://bloggingauthors.com/bl… more

Posted: 30 days ago
by vetwriter

Hello world!

Welcome to BookTalk.org Blogs. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start blogging!

See those links at the very top of the page? To get into your control panel for… more

Posted: 31 days ago
by mryan2930

A Second In Time

Its January 1945 and British, Commonwealth, US and POWs from various other nationalities are finally awaiting liberation from the various camps in Eastern Europe, where some of the… more

Posted: 31 days ago
by carolemct

Hiding The Details In The Fine Print Still Works

A good friend of mine recently received a pre-paid credit card. She went to pay for a $20.00 gas purchase only to later find out that over a $70.00 hold was placed on her card for… more

Posted: 32 days ago
by life is a business

Theres No Such Thing As A Blank Canvas In Life

While watching the bube tube (TV) this morning I stumbled on a motivational speaker saying “today marks a new year, you now have a blank canvas to work from.”

After hearing th… more

Posted: 40 days ago
by life is a business

Happy New Year!

The 12th Disciple wishes you and yours a Happy New Year. Many of us hope and pray that 2012 will bring better leadership in the government of the United States, better leadership i… more

Posted: 41 days ago
by 12th disciple

Does fiction have a role to play in educating people about real events?

The Cat & The Nightingale Saga, the docu drama version of The Weekend Trippers, also tells Rifleman Ted Taylor’s story but in a slightly different way. It too tells of the… more

Posted: 41 days ago
by carolemct

Out With The Woe Is Me And in With The Look At Me

In 2011 I published my book; in the book I outlined 9 Key Principles to Prosperity (happiness).  Like many of you, I walked through 2011 with the Woe is me attitude. When… more

Posted: 41 days ago
by life is a business

Original Thoughts, Do They Exist Anymore?

More and more these days I see people using social media to quote what someone else has said. I see people posting their favorite rappers lyrics, lines from movies and what seems t… more

Posted: 43 days ago
by life is a business

14th December. Wednesday

I’m down the school for the first time today. My friend visited two weeks ago and said it was chaos. They must have heard I was back because everything is tidy and orderly today… more

Posted: 50 days ago
by heledd

...

I'm quite positive that everyone who enters this site has the same thing in mind: fear of seeing a world without books, without literature. We see it everyday, more people qui… more

Posted: 51 days ago
by aracelip7

12 December, Monday

For once in my life I step off the plane at Banjul, and don’t get a rush of elation. I went home to see my daughter’s twins safely delivered. They are all well now, but I’m goin… more

Posted: 53 days ago
by heledd

It's the Most Wonderful Time of the Year...For Some.

The 12th Disciple is up and running. We have a page on Facebook if you'd like to come join us for updates and other miscellaneous debris.

Hanukkah runs from the 20th-28th. … more

Posted: 56 days ago
by 12th disciple

Handle Your Business!

Last weekend I witnessed a couple of family members literally fall apart at the seams because of a problem with a couple of their employees. They recently opened a group home, and … more

Posted: 57 days ago
by life is a business





BookTalk.org Chat Room 
Enter the BookTalk.org Chat Room

Enter our Chat [0]

Chat Room Always Open!

Tell your friends when to meet you
in the BookTalk.org Chat Room.

Booktalk.org on Facebook 


If you enjoy business bestsellers and would like to expand your business knowledge check out the quality book summaries offered by the world's leading book summary company.




BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSBOOKSTRANSCRIPTSOLD FORUMSADVERTISELINKSBLOGSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY

BOOK FORUMS FOR ALL BOOKS WE HAVE DISCUSSED
Lost Memory of Skin: A Novel by Russell BanksThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. KuhnHobbes: Leviathan by Thomas HobbesThe House of the Spirits - by Isabel AllendeArguably: Essays by Christopher HitchensThe Falls: A Novel (P.S.) by Joyce Carol OatesChrist in Egypt by D.M. MurdockThe Glass Bead Game: A Novel by Hermann HesseA Devil's Chaplain by Richard DawkinsThe Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph CampbellThe Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor DostoyevskyThe Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark TwainThe Moral Landscape by Sam HarrisThe Decameron by Giovanni BoccaccioThe Road by Cormac McCarthyThe Grand Design by Stephen HawkingThe Evolution of God by Robert WrightThe Tin Drum by Gunter GrassGood Omens by Neil GaimanPredictably Irrational by Dan ArielyThe Wind-Up Bird Chronicle: A Novel by Haruki MurakamiALONE: Orphaned on the Ocean by Richard Logan & Tere Duperrault FassbenderDon Quixote by Miguel De CervantesMusicophilia by Oliver SacksDiary of a Madman and Other Stories by Nikolai GogolThe Passion of the Western Mind by Richard TarnasThe Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le GuinThe Genius of the Beast by Howard BloomAlice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll Empire of Illusion by Chris HedgesThe Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner The Extended Phenotype by Richard DawkinsSmoke and Mirrors by Neil GaimanThe Selfish Gene by Richard DawkinsWhen Good Thinking Goes Bad by Todd C. RinioloHouse of Leaves by Mark Z. DanielewskiAmerican Gods: A Novel by Neil GaimanPrimates and Philosophers by Frans de WaalThe Enormous Room by E.E. CummingsThe Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar WildeGod Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher HitchensThe Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco Dreams From My Father by Barack Obama Paradise Lost by John Milton Bad Money by Kevin PhillipsThe Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson BurnettGodless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists by Dan BarkerThe Things They Carried by Tim O'BrienThe Limits of Power by Andrew BacevichLolita by Vladimir NabokovOrlando by Virginia Woolf On Being Certain by Robert A. Burton50 reasons people give for believing in a god by Guy P. HarrisonWalden: Or, Life in the Woods by Henry David ThoreauExile and the Kingdom by Albert CamusOur Inner Ape by Frans de WaalYour Inner Fish by Neil ShubinNo Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthyThe Age of American Unreason by Susan JacobyTen Theories of Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson & David HabermanHeart of Darkness by Joseph ConradThe Stuff of Thought by Stephen PinkerA Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled HosseiniThe Lucifer Effect by Philip ZimbardoResponsibility and Judgment by Hannah ArendtInterventions by Noam ChomskyGodless in America by George A. RickerReligious Expression and the American Constitution by Franklyn S. HaimanDeep Economy by Phil McKibbenThe God Delusion by Richard DawkinsThe Third Chimpanzee by Jared DiamondThe Woman in the Dunes by Abe KoboEvolution vs. Creationism by Eugenie C. ScottThe Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael PollanI, Claudius by Robert GravesBreaking The Spell by Daniel C. DennettA Peace to End All Peace by David FromkinThe Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey NiffeneggerThe End of Faith by Sam HarrisEnder's Game by Orson Scott CardThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark HaddonValue and Virtue in a Godless Universe by Erik J. WielenbergThe March by E. L DoctorowThe Ethical Brain by Michael GazzanigaFreethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan JacobyCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared DiamondThe Battle for God by Karen ArmstrongThe Future of Life by Edward O. WilsonWhat is Good? by A. C. GraylingCivilization and Its Enemies by Lee HarrisPale Blue Dot by Carl SaganHow We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God by Michael ShermerLooking for Spinoza by Antonio DamasioLies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them by Al FrankenThe Red Queen by Matt RidleyThe Blank Slate by Stephen PinkerUnweaving the Rainbow by Richard DawkinsAtheism: A Reader edited by S.T. JoshiGlobal Brain by Howard BloomThe Lucifer Principle by Howard BloomGuns, Germs and Steel by Jared DiamondThe Demon-Haunted World by Carl SaganBury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee BrownFuture Shock by Alvin Toffler

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOur Amazon.com SalesMassimo Pigliucci Rationally SpeakingOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism BooksFACTS Book Selections

cron
Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2011. All rights reserved.
Website developed by MidnightCoder.ca
Display Pagerank