If that was not critical thinking what would you call it?
Magic?
And as I said, intuition is dodgy at best… in this case you clearly have it wrong… your claims are almost entirely false… your opinions angry and demonizing… you demand answers to your questions, yet answer none of ours… and you only accept the data that supports your twisted view.
You are not looking at the data fairly and you certainly are not applying the same intellectual humility and intellectual honesty that you did when you researched pacifier.
Can you hear yourself Thomas?
We use critical thinking but we do not know what it is?
That is stupid beyond even what I expect from you… and how do you suddenly know what courses and research we have done?
Critical thinking is taught in school you know…
And I am sorry, but looking at a few web-pages does not automatically make you "the Grand Pooh-Baa" of critical thinking.
We have put up… there are a great many definitions of critical thinking on this thread 6 of which I gave you myself, most were from respected people in that field of study.
You asked for real world examples of critical thinking, Johnsosn1010 provided one, which you blatantly and wrongly denied, then you provided one, (Thanks again) which you also wrongly deny we have given you everything you asked for and more, yet you still defy reason.
Here it the truth of the matter… you will not accept our claims.
I suspect that that is because critical thinking threatens your faith. Therefore like many of the faithful before you, you are on a crusade to destroy anything that threatens it, and like those religious executioners of the past your faith is blinding you to reason
You are acting like a cornered skunk… spraying toxic stink at everything that you find threatening.
Yet even with a scatter shot you still are off the mark… critical thinking is not a science… it resembles the thinking tools used in science… nothing more.
And you ended with a bible verse… and with a not very subtle threat to our eternal salvation… that in itself is very telling… but not very convincing.
Later