• In total there are 6 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 6 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 789 on Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:08 am

One man, many women. Right?

#10: Sept. - Oct. 2003 (Non-Fiction)
Jeremy1952
Kindle Fanatic
Posts: 545
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 2:19 pm
21
Location: Saint Louis

One man, many women. Right?

Unread post

C'mon guys, does everyone agree that polygamy would be a great deal for women and a lousy deal for men... and that's why men have outlawed it, not, as they purport, to protect women?Quote:pp 186:Incidentally, the polygyny threshold leads me to ask the question In whose interest is it that polygamy be outlawed in our society? We automatically assume it is in the interest of women. But consider; it would presumably be illegal, as it is now, for people to be forced to marry against their will, so second wives would be choosing their lot voluntarily. A woman who wants a career would surely find a menage a trois more, not less, convenient; she would have two partners to help share the chores of child care. As a Mormon lawyer put it recently, there are "compelling social reasons" that make polygamy "attractive to the modern career woman." But think of the effect on men. If many women chose to be second wives of rich men rather than first wives of poor men, there would be a shortage of unmarried women, and many men would be forced to remain unhappily celibate. Far from being laws to protect women, antipolygamy statutes may really do more to protect men. Science is neither a philosophy nor a belief system. It is a combination of mental operations that has become increasingly the habit of educated peoples, a culture of illuminations hit upon by a fortunate turn of history that yielded the most effective way of learning about the real world ever conceived. E.O.Wilson
User avatar
PeterDF
Freshman
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 5:29 pm
20
Has thanked: 15 times
Been thanked: 4 times
Gender:
Contact:
Great Britain

Re: One man, many women. Right?

Unread post

I suppose the flaw in this argument would be that the men in charge - the ones who make the laws - would be the ones with the harem. Its the poor serfs and underlings that would have to do without wives - and who cares about them?
Swamy Maximus

Re: One man, many women. Right?

Unread post

Robert Wright, in his excellent book The Moral Animal gives a clear explanation for why it would be bad for men as a group
Post Reply

Return to “The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature - by Matt Ridley”