• In total there are 3 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 3 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 789 on Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:08 am

The Sound and the Fury, section 4, April 8, 1928

#74: Nov. - Dec. 2009 (Fiction)
User avatar
Suzanne

1F - BRONZE CONTRIBUTOR
Book General
Posts: 2513
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:51 pm
14
Location: New Jersey
Has thanked: 518 times
Been thanked: 399 times

The Sound and the Fury, section 4, April 8, 1928

Unread post

THE SOUND AND THE FURY, APRIL 8, 1928
WildCityWoman
Genius
Posts: 759
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 6:09 am
16
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 13 times

Unread post

That first chapter . . . I found it very confusing - I couldn't keep the names straight, as to who was who and most of the time had no idea of what they were talking about.

Is this just me?
User avatar
Suzanne

1F - BRONZE CONTRIBUTOR
Book General
Posts: 2513
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:51 pm
14
Location: New Jersey
Has thanked: 518 times
Been thanked: 399 times

Unread post

Wow, how did you get to section four so fast?

No, your are not alone with the confusion of the names. There are two Quentins, there are two Jasons, and there are two Maurys. The trick is to determine the time period to understand which is which.

The first section is narrated by Benjy. This first section introduces the main characters. A good tip to understanding the time line is to observe who is with Benjy. For instance, Versh, Dilsey’s son is with Benjy as a child. T.P., also Dilsey’s son is with him during adolescence and Luster, Dilsesy’s grandson is with Benjy as an adult. The events from the first section do become clearer in subsequent sections. But it is a puzzle. Do you like puzzles?
User avatar
seespotrun2008

1F - BRONZE CONTRIBUTOR
Graduate Student
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:54 am
15
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: The Sound and the Fury, section 4, April 8, 1928

Unread post

I am struck by the difference in writing moving from the 1st person to the 3rd person. The first three chapters seem more limited because they are told from each individual perspective, I think. Taking a step back in the 4th chapter has a completely different feel. There are dynamics that are not noticeable in the first three chapters that come to light in the 4th chapter. One knows from the 3rd chapter that Jason seems to be irritated with Dilsey. I feel like I get from the 4th chapter that Dilsey does not really like Jason either, that the tension is coming from both sides. The last chapter also seems more orderly. The first 3 chapters are somewhat disorderly, I think, because that is how people actually think. Since the last chapter is supposed to be more objective it seems clearer. I am actually really excited now to go back after I have finished this chapter and read from the beginning.
User avatar
seespotrun2008

1F - BRONZE CONTRIBUTOR
Graduate Student
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:54 am
15
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: The Sound and the Fury, section 4, April 8, 1928

Unread post

Have you guys noticed that this book begins and ends with violence? Benji starts by telling us that someone is hitting something. At the end of course, Jason is hitting the horse and Luster. It is interesting.

I also noticed that the book begins and ends with both the concepts of life/death. The book starts on Good Friday (death), but Benji keeps flashing back to a time close to Christmas (birth/life). At the end, the characters are in a graveyard (death) on Easter day (rebirth/life). It is kind of cool. I think you could probably spend your entire life studying this book. :)
User avatar
DWill

1H - GOLD CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
16
Location: Luray, Virginia
Has thanked: 2262 times
Been thanked: 2470 times

Re: The Sound and the Fury, section 4, April 8, 1928

Unread post

Did you pick up on why Luster and Benjy were going to the graveyard? I missed that. You"re right, the fourth section brings order in a couple of ways. First, just by the return of the authorial narration that eliminates the unreliability of the personal narratives of the first three sections. And second, by the presence of Dilsey, whose role is explicity to keep some order amid the chaos of the last days of the Compson dynasty. She even realizes, after listening to the preacher, that she has seen the Compson family complete, both the beginning and the end. There is irony in the book's structure, in that it begins and ends with the most marginalized characters in the story--the mentally retarded Benjy and the black servant Dilsey. They are the moral reflectors in the novel, more powerful than the characters who possess the remains of the Compsons' social status. Dilsey is of course the only intact human being in the novel, the only one whose personality has not been brutalized by family or society--even though she is only a generation or two removed from slavery and still has few rights.
User avatar
seespotrun2008

1F - BRONZE CONTRIBUTOR
Graduate Student
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:54 am
15
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: The Sound and the Fury, section 4, April 8, 1928

Unread post

Did you pick up on why Luster and Benjy were going to the graveyard? I missed that.
Good point, Dwill. I knew there was a character that died in the book and I think I assumed they were going to visit the grave or something. But I am not completely sure, either.
There is irony in the book's structure, in that it begins and ends with the most marginalized characters in the story--the mentally retarded Benjy and the black servant Dilsey. They are the moral reflectors in the novel, more powerful than the characters who possess the remains of the Compsons' social status. Dilsey is of course the only intact human being in the novel, the only one whose personality has not been brutalized by family or society--even though she is only a generation or two removed from slavery and still has few rights.
Great insight! I had not thought of that. Such a fascinating book.
User avatar
Suzanne

1F - BRONZE CONTRIBUTOR
Book General
Posts: 2513
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:51 pm
14
Location: New Jersey
Has thanked: 518 times
Been thanked: 399 times

Re: The Sound and the Fury, section 4, April 8, 1928

Unread post

Did you guys know there is a movie of "The Sound and the Fury"? I just finished watching it, on the computer! There are 12 or so parts to it. I've seen some bad film adaptations of books, but this film wins the stinky prize!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UFL7F1KT0AE
User avatar
seespotrun2008

1F - BRONZE CONTRIBUTOR
Graduate Student
Posts: 416
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 2:54 am
15
Location: Portland, OR
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 39 times

Re: The Sound and the Fury, section 4, April 8, 1928

Unread post

Did you guys know there is a movie of "The Sound and the Fury"? I just finished watching it, on the computer! There are 12 or so parts to it. I've seen some bad film adaptations of books, but this film wins the stinky prize!
:lol: I'll bet. I think it would be next to impossible to make a movie of this book.
User avatar
DWill

1H - GOLD CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
16
Location: Luray, Virginia
Has thanked: 2262 times
Been thanked: 2470 times

Re: The Sound and the Fury, section 4, April 8, 1928

Unread post

Suzanne wrote:Did you guys know there is a movie of "The Sound and the Fury"? I just finished watching it, on the computer! There are 12 or so parts to it. I've seen some bad film adaptations of books, but this film wins the stinky prize!

It's really too bad I don't have ability to watch video! But I had seen a mention of this movie, starring Yul Brynner and Joanne Woodward, and all I could think of was some insane parody of The King and I. But, I see that a new version is set to be released in 2010, now under way in Sweden. I couldn't get any other info about it, other than it exists.

I suppose the average movie director would go right away for the Jason/Quentiin plot element. That could make a pretty good movie I suppose if well done--but it wouldn't be The Sound and the Fury by Faulkner if that was the exclusive focus.

I'm curious, Suzanne. What were a few lowlights of this movie?
Post Reply

Return to “The Sound and the Fury - by William Faulkner”