• In total there are 4 users online :: 0 registered, 0 hidden and 4 guests (based on users active over the past 60 minutes)
    Most users ever online was 789 on Tue Mar 19, 2024 5:08 am

Ch. 4 - Why Strange Coincidences Are Normal

#70: Aug. - Sept. 2009 (Non-Fiction)
User avatar
Chris OConnor

1A - OWNER
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 17016
Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 2:43 pm
21
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 3509 times
Been thanked: 1309 times
Gender:
Contact:
United States of America

Ch. 4 - Why Strange Coincidences Are Normal

Unread post

Ch. 4 - Why Strange Coincidences Are Normal, and Why the Critical Thinker is Wary of Secondhand Sources
User avatar
Interbane

1G - SILVER CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 7203
Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2004 12:59 am
19
Location: Da U.P.
Has thanked: 1105 times
Been thanked: 2166 times
United States of America

Unread post

This chapter highlights one of the most irritating types of claims from other people. Something coincidental will happen and with absolute conviction they'll say 'see, God does exist!". Even if they're not theistic, they'll spout out some nonsense about Karma. If friends and family aren't interested in reading this whole book, then at least this chapter should be read.
User avatar
Chris OConnor

1A - OWNER
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 17016
Joined: Sun May 05, 2002 2:43 pm
21
Location: Florida
Has thanked: 3509 times
Been thanked: 1309 times
Gender:
Contact:
United States of America

Unread post

No doubt. I hate hearing this one. Coincidences happen and it is chance, not magic that makes them happen.
User avatar
geo

2C - MOD & GOLD
pets endangered by possible book avalanche
Posts: 4779
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
15
Location: NC
Has thanked: 2198 times
Been thanked: 2200 times
United States of America

Unread post

If you flip a coin and get heads five times in a row, is there a greater chance of the next throw being tails? Some people would think, yes. But of course, the coin doesn't know that you just flipped heads five times in a row and, statistically, there's a 50-50 chance of it being heads or tails. This is probably counter-intuitive for many people (me included). And slot machines being "due" for a win? Doesn't happen.
-Geo
Question everything
User avatar
Suzanne

1F - BRONZE CONTRIBUTOR
Book General
Posts: 2513
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 10:51 pm
14
Location: New Jersey
Has thanked: 518 times
Been thanked: 399 times

coincedence

Unread post

Every night there is a percentage of people who will dream about a natural disaster, or a plane crash. If tonight, I dream about a horrible earthquake and I wake up in the morning to find an earthquake has actually happened, it's not a preminition, it's a statistic.
User avatar
CWT36
Sophomore
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Aug 05, 2009 12:04 pm
14
Location: Riverhead, Long Island
Has thanked: 3 times
Been thanked: 6 times
Contact:

Unread post

Probability statistics and game theory are fascinating. The "Monty Hall problem" is a great example because anybody over 40 has seen the game show. The solution to the problem surprises almost everybody and they find it hard to believe even after you've proven it mathematically.

Technically this is called a veridical paradox as it produces a result that appears absurd but is demonstrated to be true nevertheless.

http://montyhallproblem.com/
User avatar
geo

2C - MOD & GOLD
pets endangered by possible book avalanche
Posts: 4779
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 4:24 am
15
Location: NC
Has thanked: 2198 times
Been thanked: 2200 times
United States of America

Unread post

CWT36 wrote:Probability statistics and game theory are fascinating. The "Monty Hall problem" is a great example because anybody over 40 has seen the game show. The solution to the problem surprises almost everybody and they find it hard to believe even after you've proven it mathematically.

Technically this is called a veridical paradox as it produces a result that appears absurd but is demonstrated to be true nevertheless.

http://montyhallproblem.com/
Hey CWT. Thanks for posting this. I came across the Monty Hall problem a couple years back. There was an article in the NYTimes. it still blows my mind.

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/04/08/science/08monty.html
-Geo
Question everything
User avatar
DWill

1H - GOLD CONTRIBUTOR
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame
Posts: 6966
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2008 8:05 am
16
Location: Luray, Virginia
Has thanked: 2262 times
Been thanked: 2470 times

Unread post

Anyone been guilty of basing an 'informed' opinion on secondhand reports? I know I do this, and the main reasons are laziness and lack of time to perform due diligence, as Riniolo calls it. The alternative to voicing opinions that really aren't worth much seems to be to say "I don't know" a lot more often. But there still will be times when, because we can't become experts on everything, we'll let a proxy to the work and trust that he's done an honest and thorough job. This I believe is what many of us do with the climate change issue. We cite a 'consensus' of expert findings that CC is really happening.
Post Reply

Return to “When Good Thinking Goes Bad - by Todd C. Riniolo”