Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 374 Location: Ashland, NH
Thanks: 0 Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender:
Should we tolerate religion?
Quote:Isn't Sam Harris American? Can you point to a single significant view that HAS TO be held by all Americans? The real question is, I suggest: is religous tolerance a good thing? Also, can I make a plea for Americans to be less parochial? The question of tolerance is universal.
Nice to have some views from across the pond! that should keep discussion from becoming biased culturally towards a United States angle.
Yes, Sam Harris is American from what I understand, and that was exactly my point of suggesting that believing in religious un-tolerance seems Un-American. I do not believe there is a single point of view that all Americans must share, we have freedoms guaranteed by our Bill or Rights, and people are certainly free to believe what they want to believe. My point was that the idea of religious in-tolerance goes against the "spirit" of what the country was founded on. United States was actually VERY intolerant of non-majority religions during its founding, but the "spirit" of the idea of tolerence was there because the Founding Fathers knew that their majority religion could easily become the minority and they needed that protection. That didn't stop them from creating laws mandating officer holders be protestent, but at least the spirit of the issue was there and in writing to protect religious freedom which latter budded into a sense of tolerance. Edited by: Chris OConnor at: 4/4/06 9:59 am
Joined: Mar 2006 Posts: 18
Thanks: 0 Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender:
Should we tolerate religion?
Quote:Nice to have some views from across the pond! that should keep discussion from becoming biased culturally towards a United States angle.
Yes, Sam Harris is American from what I understand, and that was exactly my point of suggesting that believing in religious un-tolerance seems Un-American.
The label "un-american" really grates in British ears, or at least in my ears. The closest parallel we have might be the phrase "It's just not British, old chap". This is old fashioned and smacks of Imperialism. Edited by: Chris OConnor at: 4/4/06 10:00 am
Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 374 Location: Ashland, NH
Thanks: 0 Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender:
Should we tolerate religion?
mal4mac, i am normally the first person to agree with you about lame jingoistic imperialist flag waving crap. but i think there are certain aspects of the founding of the united states that truly defined the country, and to turn against those aspects defies what made this country great. i only use that phrase in the sense of a harsh critic that see's his country going down the drain. Edited by: Chris OConnor at: 4/4/06 10:00 am
Joined: Nov 2004 Posts: 2557 Location: decentralized
Thanks: 0 Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender:
Should we tolerate religion?
Mac, the difference of perspective here is probably latent in the two nationalities you guys represent. In America, we keep in mind, without giving much conscious thought to it, the perception that our nation is held together by a kind of democratic volunteerism. We think, "these are the principles that define our nation, and if you don't like them, you can go somewhere else." That mentality bubbles out a lot in all sorts of bigotry ("If you can't speak our language, go back to Mexico") and Jingoism (see McCarthyism), but it isn't, at root, prejudiced, I think. It's just part of the American experiment -- the idea that a nation can be conceived along ideological lines. So when an American says that another American behaves or speaks in an un-American way, what we generally mean is that, given the choice between being American or not, they've taken a step towards the not side of the issue.
It's enlightening to look at the history of nationalistic movements, to see how other nations have solidified their national identity. Language was a big factor (and one that recurs here, as I've hinted above). Myth and folklore played a big part in the Germanic and Scandinavian states, re: Grimm, Christiansen, etc. Skin color and ancestral identity have played their part, especially in Africa and the South Pacific. Before Rousseau, it probably wasn't even possible to conceive of a national identity built around an ideology.
But, I digress. Edited by: Chris OConnor at: 4/4/06 10:00 am
Joined: Jun 2004 Posts: 3552 Location: NJ
Thanks: 1 Thanked: 5 times in 5 posts
Gender: Country:
Should we tolerate religion?
Quote:So when an American says that another American behaves or speaks in an un-American way, what we generally mean is that, given the choice between being American or not, they've taken a step towards the not side of the issue.
The really funny thing I thinked when reading this is how any one side of an idealistic argument nowadays will use this to accuse the other side of said deficiency!
Joined: May 2002 Posts: 12136 Images: 0 Location: Florida Highscores:145 Thanks: 861 Thanked: 378 times in 300 posts
Gender: Country:
Should we tolerate religion?
I'm not sure why this thread was created. Everyone is welcome to create new threads, but this thread starts out indicating it is in reference to Chapter 1 and something riverc0il said in the Ch. 1 thread. It seems using that already created thread would make for a more organized discussion.
I've edited the subject line so it no longer says "Re: Chapter 1," as this was what was confusing people. Edited by: Chris OConnor at: 4/4/06 10:02 am
Joined: Dec 2005 Posts: 374 Location: Ashland, NH
Thanks: 0 Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender:
Re: Should we tolerate religion?
According to this poll, more than half of BookTalk.org is female. Though I suspect the highest posting registered users are mostly male at this point.
The second definition of my American Heritage dictionary defines tolerate as: To Recognize and respect (the rights, beliefs, or practices of others). But the third definition is: To put up with; endure. The two definitions clash in my opinion. Putting up with something versus respecting and recognizing may denote similar actions but bring to mind vastly different attitudes. I appreciate the second definition in regards to tolerance of religion. Rather, I "put up with" fundamentalists and extremists (such as Harris) since their opinions are theirs to have and freedoms ensure such opinions can be held and communicated, which I am fine with.
Joined: Apr 2006 Posts: 20
Thanks: 0 Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender:
Re: Should we tolerate religion?
At last, riverc0il, something we can agree on. Let us say, however, that you are the one being "tolerated" ("put up with"). (You can take this "you" as rhetorical or theoretical.) Let's say that you are not an extremist, but rather a mild-mannered, moderate person, but another person graciously suggests he will "tolerate" you and your beliefs. Or you and your skin color. Or you and your ethnicity. Etc.
How does this make any of us feel? Is there any sense of being patronized? Which is, of course, infinitely preferable to being tied to the stake and set alight.
Then, does Harris's argument for intolerance have any legitimacy in a particular situation? My husband and I have just been discussing "hate" speech; I am very wary of any form of censorship. I do not think people have the right to threaten to harm or kill other specific people (I do not have the right to call you up and say I am going to kill your child, for instance), but I would hate to censor even the ugliest forms of speech that fall short of specific threats.
I think people have the right to say "I hate [fill in the blank] people." I think they have the right to draw insulting cartoons. I think they have the right to write humorous novels about Moses and Jesus and Mohammed. Though some people make take these statements, cartoons, movies, whatever, as hate speech, that does not give them the right to stop such speech.
I stopped reading Harris's book, but if he thinks religion is passe (or whatever; and I don't know how to put an accent in passe), how about attitudes rooted in religion? Does he think the notion that people "deserve" their lot in life (Calvinism) should be rooted out? Does he think the concept of humans as somehow superior to other animals (Genesis) should be outlawed? He says he follows Buddhist practices, but I didn't see much evidence of that in his sweeping statements (not what Buddhists would term "right speech").
Did he write this book just to make a name for himself? I think fundamentalist preachers are essentially grifters, so I'm always skeptical about people's motives.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
Love to talk about books but don't have time for our book discussion forums? For casual book talk join us on Facebook.
Support BookTalk.org
BookTalk.org is being upgraded to a totally new design. This upgrade is expensive. Any support would be VERY helpful! See who supports us.
Make a donation
PEOPLE PAYING FOR OUR UPGRADE:
• afv - $10 May
• LevV - $50 March
• Dexter - $10 March
• supernova38 - $25 March
• Oblivion - $20 March
• jheimlich - $20 February
• Robert Tulip - $50 February
• giselle - $50 January
Children here need worming
regularly, and I think I
need to buy more worming
tablets, so while my friends
sit on the beach, I have to
catch bush taxis up to the… more
The children have a long way
to walk to the nearest primary
school. At the moment they are
in temporary accommodation,
with volunteer teachers. There
is community land available,
a… more
The price of The 12th Disciple
has been updated to $3.99 for
Kindle readers. The book is
still available for free to
borrow for Amazon Prime
members. To be
competitive, and s… more
The 12th Disciple has been
reviewed by two different
people on Amazon. They
purchased the Kindle edition;
one in the US, one in the
UK. One review was
5-stars (US) and the oth… more
I'd like to say I've
been reading Harry Potter
since the day the world renown
series appeared on the
scene. Unfortunately,
the truth is I began reading
Harry Potter… more
Easter teaches many of us the
importance of redemption and
resurrection. Regardless of
what faith people follow, the
story of Jesus Christ has been
told in many languages in many
c… more
Our Book Talk will begin on
Wednesday, May 2nd. I look
forward to hearing about your
learning and classroom
experiences with Number Talks
as it all unfolds...
NONOPPOSITIONAL NONVIOLENCE
“The minute you conquer the
fear of death, at that moment
you are free. I submit to you
that if a man hasnÂ’t
discovered something that he
will die f… more
Yesterday, when I went to feed
Jeni the donkey, I noticed
swarms of bees entering
EbrimaÂ’s house through the
cracks in the door. We both
had a look, but he didnÂ’t
open his door… more
Whether you want to implement
number talks but are unsure of
how to begin or have
experience but want more
guidance in crafting
purposeful problems, this
dynamic multimedia resourc… more
Do you feel entitled? For
years I have listened to and,
in some instances, complained
that some people in America
feel entitled. For years I
have watched as these people
are portra… more
On Fat Tuesday and Ash
Wednesday of 2012, The 12th
Disciple was free to Kindle
users on both days. In all,
about 550 worldwide Kindle
users downloaded a copy of the
book.
‘Sacred Are the Brave’ a
collection of short stories
about the nonviolent
revolutions 1986-1989 is now
available in Kindle. Each of
the nine stories has
characters who are just
… more
The Weekend TrippersÂ’ is the
true story of Rfn Ted Taylor
and his part in the heroic
last stand in Calais May 1940.
The Weekend Trippers is based
on TedÂ’s diaries written at
the… more
Tell your friends when to meet you in the BookTalk.org Chat Room.
If you enjoy business bestsellers and would like to expand your business knowledge check out the quality book summaries offered by the world's leading book summary company.
BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.
Tweet This Topic
at: 4/4/06 9:59 am
