Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:21 pm

<< Week of July 24, 2016 >>
Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday
24 Day Month

25 Day Month

26 Day Month

27 Day Month

28 Day Month

29 Day Month

30 Day Month





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
Should we reduce book discussions from 3 mo. to 2 mo.? 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

BookTalk.org Owner
Diamond Contributor 3

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 15093
Location: Florida
Thanks: 2899
Thanked: 1114 times in 882 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)
Highscores: 6

Post Should we reduce book discussions from 3 mo. to 2 mo.?
I'm brainstorming and thinking of ways we can make BookTalk beter and this is what I'm thinking. Having a nonfiction book discussion last an entire quarter is starting to seem slower than is ideal. How do you all feel about ending this book at the end of this month and starting to do a new nonfiction book every two months?




Sun May 14, 2006 4:35 pm
Profile Email WWW
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
The Pope of Literature


Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2553
Location: decentralized
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Should we reduce book discussions from 3 mo. to 2 mo.?
Sounds like a good idea to me, perhaps with extensions for longer books. Either that, or some sort of structure to the whole process. Although, I don't know how to introduce a structure without limiting the ease with which people jump in on on-going discussions.




Sun May 14, 2006 4:44 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Senior


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 373
Location: Ashland, NH
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Should we reduce book discussions from 3 mo. to 2 mo.?
I would enjoy more frequent discussions. To be frank, as the Discussion Leader for End of Faith, I really have not been commenting much as I completed the book over a month ago and have added anything I wanted to already to the discussion. Hard to stir conversation when a book is already posted to half.com and I have completed 2-3 books since End of Faith, lol.

I prefer to think of it like this: reducing book discussion times by only 1 month only really adds 2 additional readings for the year (six instead of four). That really isn't that many more books for book lovers even though it is a fifty percent increase mathematically. Off setting the fiction and non-fiction might keep things moving a bit as well, so if someone were to read every fiction and non-fiction book for the year, that would be one per month if it was an every other month cycle with fiction and non-fiction off set.




Sun May 14, 2006 7:36 pm
Profile YIM
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Professor

Silver Contributor

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3542
Location: NJ
Thanks: 2
Thanked: 14 times in 10 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Should we reduce book discussions from 3 mo. to 2 mo.?
I was here for the two months readings...before you knew it, the period was over. I think we started the three month readings with Collapse...and the discussions since then have, on average, had more activity.

Maybe it shouldbe based on the book selected. Every book is different and some may warrant more time spent.

If we staggar the fiction and non-fiction, the pace of the readings should help make the longer period seem shorter, yet still keep a discussion open for input.

Mr. P.

The one thing of which I am positive is that there is much of which to be negative - Mr. P.

Once you perceive the irrevocable truth, you can no longer justify the irrational denial. - Mr. P.

The pain in hell has two sides. The kind you can touch with your hand; the kind you can feel in your heart...Scorsese's &quot;Mean Streets&quot;

I came to kick ass and chew Bubble Gum...and I am all out of Bubble Gum - They Live, Roddy Piper




Mon May 15, 2006 3:50 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Senior


Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 373
Location: Ashland, NH
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Should we reduce book discussions from 3 mo. to 2 mo.?
Quote:
I was here for the two months readings...before you knew it, the period was over. I think we started the three month readings with Collapse...and the discussions since then have, on average, had more activity.

I do not think three readings is indicative of a trend, you would need more data to make such a conjecture. Also, confounding variables such as perhaps new members boosted discussion or perhaps the latest three readings were particularly interesting, noteworthy, or otherwise discussion infusions readings could also have much to do with total posts. Also, of course, if the reading goes an extra month, it does allow for some additional posting. But I think we should focus on quality over quantity here. If most people are not reading and participating on posts made during the last month of a three month reading period, are those posts really quality posts? No, they are keyboard masturbation. In a book discussion community, if most readers have already stopped discussing the book, those posts would have been better utilized had the discussion only lasted two months and the posts been made while active discussion was occuring.




Fri May 19, 2006 7:15 pm
Profile YIM
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Professor

Silver Contributor

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3542
Location: NJ
Thanks: 2
Thanked: 14 times in 10 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Should we reduce book discussions from 3 mo. to 2 mo.?
It has been four readings. The average post counts for those four equal the past nine.

Just saying. Active member participation per book has not changed much...usually onnly 4-6 members at most.

Just saying. I have been around since 2004 and I have noticed the discussions have been better since we went to 3 months.


Mr. P.

The one thing of which I am positive is that there is much of which to be negative - Mr. P.

Once you perceive the irrevocable truth, you can no longer justify the irrational denial. - Mr. P.

The pain in hell has two sides. The kind you can touch with your hand; the kind you can feel in your heart...Scorsese's &quot;Mean Streets&quot;

I came to kick ass and chew Bubble Gum...and I am all out of Bubble Gum - They Live, Roddy Piper




Fri May 19, 2006 7:18 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Site Links 
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Info for Authors & Publishers
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!
IDEAS FOR WHAT TO READ:
Bestsellers
Book Awards
• Book Reviews
• Online Books
• Team Picks
Newspaper Book Sections

WHERE TO BUY BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

BEHIND THE BOOKS:
• Great resource pages are coming!

Featured Books

Books by New Authors


*

FACTS is a select group of active BookTalk.org members passionate about promoting Freethought, Atheism, Critical Thinking and Science.

Apply to join FACTS
See who else is in FACTS







BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.



Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2016. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank