Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME ENTER FORUMS OUR BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Sat Jun 25, 2016 6:16 pm

<< Week of June 25, 2016 >>
Saturday Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday
25 Day Month

26 Day Month

27 Day Month

28 Day Month

29 Day Month

30 Day Month

1 Day Month





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5
Sarah Palin: Good, Bad or just the wrong choice? 

Do you think choosing Sarah Palin was a mistake for McCain?
Yes. She is way too inexperienced to potentially serve as President 59%  59%  [ 13 ]
Yes, she may be inexperienced, but she has charm...and thats what counts. 5%  5%  [ 1 ]
She has enough appeal to the masses to make her choice acceptable. 5%  5%  [ 1 ]
No. She lives next to Russia, so has enough experience for me. 5%  5%  [ 1 ]
Is it too late to get Tina Fey on the ticket? 23%  23%  [ 5 ]
I think she was an excellent choice. 5%  5%  [ 1 ]
Total votes : 22

Sarah Palin: Good, Bad or just the wrong choice? 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Oddly Attracted to Books

Gold Contributor

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1543
Location: France
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 34 times in 34 posts
Gender: Female
Country: France (fr)

Post 
Thanks, gentle Reader, I had seen the document you give in the link but i didn't know what to do with it.

This is interesting, but unfortunatley I can't copy the chart here, you'll need to look for a green and red chart in the middle of the document GR provided.

It shows that in proportion to their GID the top donors are Norway (0.95 % of GNI), Sweden, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands (Ireland comes just next), and that the US comes last with only 0.16 of GNI.)



Source: OECD Development Statistics Online last accessed Sunday, April 27, 2008

They say later that the reluctance of the US government to help is not due to stinginess but to the belief that you actually harm the individual by helping him directly, that he must learn to stand on his own two feet... so from that point of view they are just as wise or just as harsh as they are about their own needy citizens at home.

Another part of the document says that US citizens are more generous than their government, which I'm ready to believe, but I couldn't see any clear figures.

If one of you could find such comparative figures, I'd be interested.


_________________
Ophelia.


Sat Nov 01, 2008 5:45 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Professor

Silver Contributor

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3542
Location: NJ
Thanks: 2
Thanked: 14 times in 10 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Ophelia wrote:
Quote:
Americans give more than any other people on this planet and they do it voluntarily.


I believe you, I've tried to look up figures but couldn't find anything clear.
America has 300 million inhabitants (or more) and the biggest GNP in the world. It's only natural that they should be the biggest giver.


There are also numbers that show that as a percentage of GDP, we do not give as much as other nations. I do not have any reference to give on this, but I do remember reading about this.



Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:05 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Professor

Silver Contributor

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3542
Location: NJ
Thanks: 2
Thanked: 14 times in 10 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Ophelia wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
Americans give more than any other people on this planet and they do it voluntarily.




I was going to take this on faith, but I've just heard from a reliable source on TV that, in proportion to their GNP, the US give five times less to developing countries than European countries do.


Oops! Looks like you already pointed this out Ophelia!!



Sat Nov 01, 2008 8:06 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Internet Sage

Silver Contributor

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 340
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA, Earth.
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 6 times in 2 posts
Gender: Female

Post 
Ophelia wrote:
Quote:
They say later that the reluctance of the US government to give more is not due to stinginess but to the belief that you actually harm the individual by helping him directly.


There was a quote (translated into English from French, I suppose) from the remarks of a French politician commenting on what had gone wrong with the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund in one of the history books I was reading about it which I really liked. It was something like: "Somewhere amidst all the debate about giving them fish versus teaching them to fish, the practice of leasing them costly and fragile fishing rods seems to have crept in." :hmm: Unfortunately, that sounds just about true to form.


_________________
"Where can I find a man who has forgotten the words so that I can talk with him?"
-- Chuang-Tzu (c. 200 B.C.E.)
as quoted by Robert A. Burton


Sat Nov 01, 2008 2:38 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Oddly Attracted to Books

Gold Contributor

Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1543
Location: France
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 34 times in 34 posts
Gender: Female
Country: France (fr)

Post 
""Somewhere amidst all the debate about giving them fish versus teaching them to fish, the practice of leasing them costly and fragile fishing rods seems to have crept in."

Yes, that's a good quote :!:

At least it's better than what probably happens some of the time, ie: it's against our philosophy to give them fish and we can't make a decision about how to teach them how to fish so we'll all go home!


_________________
Ophelia.


Sat Nov 01, 2008 3:28 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4898
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1574
Thanked: 1582 times in 1196 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post 
Ophelia wrote:
..top donors are Norway (0.95 % of GNI), Sweden, Luxembourg, and the Netherlands (Ireland comes just next), ...US comes last with only 0.16 of GNI.)
Yes, this is true. Aid is a big policy difference between the USA and Europe. Supporters of aid can argue that the partnerships that are built through development actually contribute more to human security than weapon systems and wars. If the US lifted its official development assistance to one percent of gross national income, matching the Nordics, it could transform the planet into a place of peace and prosperity.
Quote:
... reluctance of the US government to help is not due to stinginess
Well, I think the comparatively low level of American help to the rest of the world is due to stinginess. If Americans were more generous people would like them a lot more. Again, aid policy has wider impacts. US security would be better enhanced by supporting global economic development than by putting up barriers to dialogue. As well, official development assistance is a main tool to reverse global climate change.
Quote:
but to the belief that you actually harm the individual by helping him directly
there is something to the argument about direct help having corrosive effects. That is why it is better to find ways to invest for profit than to support charity, except in emergencies. There are a lot of profitable opportunities in areas that benefit the poor. Functioning markets are the main tool to reduce poverty.



Sun Nov 02, 2008 6:51 pm
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Internet Sage

Silver Contributor

Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 340
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA, Earth.
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 6 times in 2 posts
Gender: Female

Post 
Robert Tulip wrote:

Quote:
If the US lifted its official development assistance to one percent of gross national income, matching the Nordics, it could transform the planet into a place of peace and prosperity.


Oh phooey. I wasn't going to open this can of worms, but just try to stop me now. Our strings-attached development "assistance" is what has nearly destroyed the Third World. Who says Europe or the US knows better than the Third World does how to live in the latters' own countries? They were doing just fine on their own before the people with the polluting, obtuse, destructive, exploitative, elder-disrespecting, not-thoroughly-tested, toxic methods for doing everything came and started telling them to do it all differently.

Quote:
Quote:
... reluctance of the US government to help is not due to stinginess
Well, I think the comparatively low level of American help to the rest of the world is due to stinginess. If Americans were more generous people would like them a lot more. Again, aid policy has wider impacts. US security would be better enhanced by supporting global economic development than by putting up barriers to dialogue. As well, official development assistance is a main tool to reverse global climate change.


Well, much as I like information about how to win friends and influence people, and much as I am in favor of enhanced dialogue rather than barriers to it, I balk at the assumptions underlying your conclusion: "official development assistance is a main tool to reverse global climate change." "Development" is what is causing global climate change. And what makes the "developed" countries exporting their over-polluting, over-consuming methods to places with populations too huge to sustain them "official"-ly better than smaller-scale, clearer, more direct exchanges among people?

Right here, right now, we need to be transforming and shifting our infrastructure, transportation and energy grids so that they function more like those of the Third World's traditional, sustainable methods did before we started to mess them up. If you don't have the right answer in effective practice, you can't model it or teach it to others.

Quote:
but to the belief that you actually harm the individual by helping him directly
there is something to the argument about direct help having corrosive effects. That is why it is better to find ways to invest for profit than to support charity, except in emergencies. There are a lot of profitable opportunities in areas that benefit the poor. Functioning markets are the main tool to reduce poverty.


If I am in a position to give someone something they need, I hope I can give it without any strings, allowing that person or group an opportunity for empowerment through exercising their choice, their creativity, their intelligence with their unfettered use of it to navigate their world, with which they are more familiar than I am, and in which they, not I, have to live with the results. Look at what the greed of so-called lenders has done to our economy recently. It was doing that and worse to the Third World for decades.

If I trusted that the governments here and there were using the money to benefit the people and the countries as a whole, rather than to profit some dangerously powerful money-addicts, I would be more for it. As it is, I like groups like the ones where you support women's small businesses, help people who need to get eye surgery, buy fair trade products which are made in environmentally clean ways by well-compensated, independent people -- individuals helping at a small, clear, manageable level. Other than that it is better for everyone if I just consume less, use the most conscientious patterns of consumption and transportation I can, buy local and organic, and reuse, recycle. I want them to teach us as much as we teach them. They are not such dummies, you know.


_________________
"Where can I find a man who has forgotten the words so that I can talk with him?"
-- Chuang-Tzu (c. 200 B.C.E.)
as quoted by Robert A. Burton


Sun Nov 02, 2008 8:11 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor
Book Discussion Leader

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4898
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1574
Thanked: 1582 times in 1196 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post 
GentleReader9 wrote:
Our strings-attached development "assistance" is what has nearly destroyed the Third World. Who says Europe or the US knows better than the Third World does how to live in the latters' own countries? They were doing just fine on their own before the people with the polluting, obtuse, destructive, exploitative, elder-disrespecting, not-thoroughly-tested, toxic methods for doing everything came and started telling them to do it all differently.
Hi GR9, you should have a look at the outcomes of the Accra Forum on Aid Effectiveness. Increasing the volume of aid assistance can meet millennium development goals. You are right that western technical expertise has not always found best development results, but there is much room to expand aid spending in ways that will be good for poor people.
GentleReader9 wrote:
I balk at the assumptions underlying your conclusion: "official development assistance is a main tool to reverse global climate change." "Development" is what is causing global climate change. And what makes the "developed" countries exporting their over-polluting, over-consuming methods to places with populations too huge to sustain them "official"-ly better than smaller-scale, clearer, more direct exchanges among people? Right here, right now, we need to be transforming and shifting our infrastructure, transportation and energy grids so that they function more like those of the Third World's traditional, sustainable methods did before we started to mess them up. If you don't have the right answer in effective practice, you can't model it or teach it to others.
Unfortunately, traditional methods are not sufficient for the large population of the world. The task is to find new global methods that will function in a sustainable way. In this regard, technologies with much promise include ocean algae farms to remove carbon from the air, and use of the currents of the oceans as arteries for transport of fresh water in fabric sacks.
Quote:
If I am in a position to give someone something they need, I hope I can give it without any strings, allowing that person or group an opportunity for empowerment through exercising their choice, their creativity, their intelligence with their unfettered use of it to navigate their world, with which they are more familiar than I am, and in which they, not I, have to live with the results. Look at what the greed of so-called lenders has done to our economy recently. It was doing that and worse to the Third World for decades. If I trusted that the governments here and there were using the money to benefit the people and the countries as a whole, rather than to profit some dangerously powerful money-addicts, I would be more for it. As it is, I like groups like the ones where you support women's small businesses, help people who need to get eye surgery, buy fair trade products which are made in environmentally clean ways by well-compensated, independent people -- individuals helping at a small, clear, manageable level. Other than that it is better for everyone if I just consume less, use the most conscientious patterns of consumption and transportation I can, buy local and organic, and reuse, recycle. I want them to teach us as much as we teach them. They are not such dummies, you know.
Good comment, but it is possible to use market instruments to support the basic development goals you suggest. A key to improved health and education is getting more money to parents and families so they can pay for services when they need them. So, for the MDGs, supporting private enterprise and improved transport and communication help lay a foundation for social objectives.



Wed Nov 05, 2008 4:25 am
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Professor

Silver Contributor

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3542
Location: NJ
Thanks: 2
Thanked: 14 times in 10 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post McCain-Palin Civil War?
Internal Strife in the Republican ticket

Quote:
The tensions and their increasingly public airing provide a revealing coda to the ill-fated McCain-Palin ticket, hinting at the mounting turmoil of a campaign that was described even by many Republicans as incoherent, negative and badly run.

For her part, Ms. Palin told reporters in Arizona on Wednesday morning that "there is absolutely no diva in me."

Later in the day, she refused to address the strife within the campaigns. "I have absolutely no intention of engaging in any of the negativity because this has been all positive for me," she said, adding that it was time to savor President-elect Barack Obama's victory and "not let the pettiness or maybe internal workings of a campaign erode any of the recognition of this historic moment."



hmmm...she is just such a vacuous person I cannot even believe that she is being CONSIDERED as the new face of the party. The Repubs better figure this out quick. Not 4 years ago they were saying the Dems lost their way and identity...seems to be a huge reversal.



Thu Nov 06, 2008 4:25 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Almost Comfortable


Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: None specified

Post Palin v Obama
Chris OConnor wrote:
I voted that she is too inexperienced to lead this country. But she has far more experience than Obama and therefore Obama is also too inexperienced to lead our nation.


I agree, but now we shall see if he can hack it.



Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:15 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Almost Comfortable


Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: None specified

Post 
GentleReader9 wrote:
I meant that the general tenor of the race has been impacted by speculations in the media along the lines of "Is America ready for it's First Black President?" or pitting the supposed appeal/drawback of supporting women in the person of Hillary Clinton against the supposed appeal/drawback of supporting people of color in the person of Obama. This framing shows our society is still racist enough to seriously ask these questions. In a non-racist, non-sexist society candidates would be assessed according to their stand on issues and whether or not they had the skills and experience that make a person a good president. Period.


As a historian I have always wondered which America would be ready for first, a black person or a female person. We may know that answer now, but we did have a lot of people voting based on bias. I recall a news anchor asking people about the race issue and a man replied that he wasn't racist but he wasn't voting for a balck man. Yeah, my husband and I sat with our mouths ajar. I also heard many say that they would not voter for a woman, so racism and sexism are still alive an kicking in America.

I wonder how much racism figured into the results of our election. Remember, racism is not just whites against all others - it works both ways. In my county the population is approximately 98% white - McCain won the local election, but in the state of Virginia the numbers are much lower (67% white non-hispanic in 2006) and Obama won the state. The US percentage was also lower in 2006 - 64%.



Sun Nov 23, 2008 8:30 am
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 71 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:



Featured Books

Books by New Authors


*

FACTS is a select group of active BookTalk.org members passionate about promoting Freethought, Atheism, Critical Thinking and Science.

Apply to join FACTS
See who else is in FACTS







BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.



Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2016. All rights reserved.
Display Pagerank