|
Rationally Speaking.
N. 16, October 2001
Heart disease
and the myth of individual responsibility
When I say heart attack what are
your first thoughts in terms of causes? A good
bet is that you will consider cholesterol levels,
and immediately after that, diet. After a bit
more thought, you might want to add stress induced
by a job with too much pressure and responsibility,
and finallyjust maybeyou will consider
the possibility of a genetic predisposition. These
are all the causes we hear from the media are
associated with heart disease, and indubitably
there is a lot of research to back these claims
up.
However, and most astoundingly, research available
since the 1960s and repeated several times since,
also shows that all the above factors are actually
minor causes of heart disease. The best single
predictor of heart problems is indeed stress,
but of an entirely different and still widely
ignored type: the stress that comes not from doing
too much or being under self-imposed pressure,
but from being ordered around with little or no
control over your destiny.
A study conducted among 17,000 British civil
servants (and before that on a million employees
of Bell Telephones in the 1960s) clearly shows
that the status of a persons job is the
most reliable predictor of heart attack, more
than obesity, smoking or high blood pressure (though
these count as well, so dont rush to get
that triple cheeseburger just yet). High cholesterol
is also a risk factor, but only in people that
are genetically predisposed to it. It seems that
your heart is by and large at the mercy of the
size of your pay check.
The studies linking the pecking order on the
job with heart problems found that what happens
is that being ordered around diminishes your sense
of control over your life, which causes stress
mediated by the release of the hormone cortisol.
High levels of cortisol not only create problems
for your coronary arteries, but depress your immune
response, so that you are also more likely to
fall prey to an infectionwhich is not helped
by the fact that the rise in cortisol is accompanied
by a decrease in serotonin, meaning that you dont
sleep very well and you never feel rested.
Privatization can do that to you too. A follow
up study on British civil servants explored how
they were coping with the new 1990s concept of
no job security. Suddenly, these people could
loose their jobs for reasons that had nothing
to do with their performance and all to do with
the capricious oscillations of the market economy.
Predictably, the employees in question felt no
control over their source of livelihood, which
caused stress and eventually illnessall
of which had little to do with diet, drinking
and smoking.
Researchers have been able to explode another
myth related to heart attacks: the idea that it
is a disease of the rich, suffered by CEOs because
of the high pressure they experience on their
job for prolonged periods of time and the associated
responsibilities of such a situation. Well, if
you are a CEO and are planning on using that as
an excuse to raise your bonus this year, forget
it. While there are exceptions, the heart attack
rate in this category is actually much lower than
the population at large, presumably because these
people are actually very much in control of what
they are doing, since they are everybody elses
boss (and even when they fail they
get to retire with a few extra million dollars
in their bank accounts). This category becomes
at riskrather ironicallyonly after
retirement, possibly because their new relaxed
life style is actually associated with very little
control. Taking it easy for someone used to issue
orders and be in charge can be fatal, literally.
Human beings are primates, and evolutionary theory
teaches us to expect something similar in our
inter-specific cousins. Sure enough, studies on
baboons have shown an increase in stress level
and production of cortisol in males that join
a new troop, because when they do so they find
themselves at the bottom of the pecking order,
with little control over availability of food
and mates. The same is true for monkeys studied
in zoos, where researchers found a nice inverse
relationship between pecking order and the furring
up of arties. Next time you see a monkey or ape,
remember to empathize with their working conditions.
Amazingly, you can even demonstrate the effect
experimentally on humans by dividing people into
two groups, giving them the same tasks, but ordering
around one group and empowering the other with
self decision making. The latter group experiences
lower levels of stress hormones, blood pressure
and heart rate.
What are we to learn from all this? For one thing
it is interesting that we are experiencing a continuous
pressure in modern society to take responsibility,
follow a healthy life style, control our diet,
watch closely what sorts of habits and addictions
we develop, or else. While this is all good advice
in general, why dont we ever hear that the
single most important factor affecting our health
is the lack of control over our lives that modern
society forces upon us? I am no neo-luddite (see
my August 2001 column), but shouldnt we
question the social order at the least to the
extent that it makes us unhappy and possibly kills
us?
I am not of course suggesting that we are experiencing
a great media conspiracy to blame
us instead of the system. The danger is a lot
more subtle than that since the facts are out
there for anybody to check, if they only bother
to. What started me on this was reading a summary
of what I have discussed in the widely available
volume by Matt Ridley, Genome. Then again, no
newspapers, TV news, or talk show picks up on
this sort of information, disseminates it to the
public, and raises awareness. The reason is probably
that questioning the system and lifting the blame
from the individual goes directly against an entrenched
aspect of the American psyche, it challenges the
basic assumption of individualism and opportunity
for everybody that this country is all about.
Well, at least once in your life it is healthy
to question even the most fundamental assumptions.
Go for it, it might hurt less than you think.
Back
to Articles | Home
|