Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME FORUMS BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Thu Aug 21, 2014 11:02 am



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
Smerdyakov on Napoleon: Karamazovian defence policy 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Book Slut

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4111
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1126
Thanked: 1169 times in 878 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post Smerdyakov on Napoleon: Karamazovian defence policy
From Smerdyakov With A Guitar
Quote:
“I don’t want to be a hussar, Marya Kondratyevna, and, what’s more, I should like to abolish all soldiers.”

“And when an enemy comes, who is going to defend us?”

“There’s no need of defense. In 1812 there was a great invasion of Russia by Napoleon, first Emperor of the French, father of the present one, and it would have been a good thing if they had conquered us. A clever nation would have conquered a very stupid one and annexed it. We should have had quite different institutions.”

“Are they so much better in their own country than we are? I wouldn’t change a dandy I know of for three young Englishmen,” observed Marya Kondratyevna tenderly, doubtless accompanying her words with a most languishing glance.


How does he get away with it? The man who wrote this treasonous treacherous sedition was celebrated by Russia as its greatest novelist, with tens of thousands attending his funeral in the bitter cold. Does he say what Russians secretly believe? Are some nations clever and some very stupid?



Thu Mar 10, 2011 11:42 am
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Holy Smokes I'm Great

Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1614
Location: Hampton, Ga
Thanks: 240
Thanked: 305 times in 232 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Smerdyakov on Napoleon: Karamazovian defence policy
Being from Australia, your question holds more weight than meets the eye. No one can really call the first nation in space "stupid". Russians do seem to have an issue with government and corruption. There are worse cases out there such as our Native Americans, Polynesians, your Aborigines, and almost a whole continent of Africans who were and in some cases still are very much behind the power curve of certain aspects of human progress and have never set up a successful government on the scale of Russia's.

Russia is trying to hold themselves up to European achievements and ideals. What if they were to hold themselves up to Indian, African, or Aztec achievements? They'd be super human.



The following user would like to thank President Camacho for this post:
Robert Tulip
Thu Mar 10, 2011 5:04 pm
Profile Email YIM
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Upper Echelon 1st Class

BookTalk.org Moderator
Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2467
Location: New Jersey
Thanks: 502
Thanked: 407 times in 325 posts
Gender: Female
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Smerdyakov on Napoleon: Karamazovian defence policy
I think you have to consider the source of this passage, this is Smerdyakov talking. Although Smerdyakov resented his heritage, held his father in distain, he was still his father's son. Smerdy's (I almost wrote: Swarmy) thoughts on Napoleon are consistant with how he and his father felt towards religion. Fyodor and Smerdy's distain for religion is almost as strong as their disgust for each other. Neither father or son believed in God, albeit for different reasons, however, Napoleon saw a value in religion, and this may have made France look weak in Smerdy's eyes.

Quote:
Religion
In terms of religion, Napoleon bordered between deism and atheism. I suppose you could say that Catholicism as a religion of salvation had little meaning to him. But, like Machiavelli, Rousseau, and Marx, Napoleon believed that religion was little more than the cement which held society together. Again, we are reminded of Marx when he remarked that "religion is the opiate of the people." According to Napoleon, religion promoted national unity and prevented class war -- it kept the people meek and mild instead of strong and independent. He made every effort to close the divide between the State and the Church, a divide created by the Revolution. The Temples of Reason (i.e., the churches) and the Cult of the Supreme Being, erected in the early 1790s, were too abstract for Napoleon. How could he expect the French common people to have understood them? So, his desire was to reconcile Church and State. Such a reconciliation would gain for Napoleon even greater approval of his people.

Shrewd, calculating and intelligent, Napoleon knew exactly what he was doing. It was for these reasons that he negotiated an agreement with the Pope. The Concordat of 1801 recognized Catholicism as the favored religion of France -- not the state religion. The clergy would be selected and paid by the State, but consecrated by the Church. So, in terms of religion, Napoleon basically guaranteed one of the rights mentioned in the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen -- religious freedom (see Lecture 12). However, the Church did not regain land confiscated during the Revolution, nor did they have the right to collect the tithe and the French clergy, though consecrated at Rome, remained under state control. Napoleon had achieved another of his aims -- Jews, Protestants and Catholics could freely practice their religion. But the Church was under state control. Although the people seemed to get what they wanted, so too did Napoleon.


http://www.historyguide.org/intellect/lecture15a.html

I have finished BK, and what I have found is that the characters may not represent Russia and certain qualities, but rather, the focus is on the characters belief or non belief in faith and religion and how this affects the lives of the characters.

If you take Russia out of the characters and see them for their religious beliefs only, the above passage is not treasonous because it comes out of the mouth of a character, it is not the voice of Russia. It is however treacherous, because Dostoevsky views those who do not have faith in God to live a treacherous life.

Robert Tulip wrote:
Does he say what Russians secretly believe? Are some nations clever and some very stupid?


Smerdy believes that yes, those who have faith in God are not clever. Napoleon encouraged the French to pracice religion making it a country of stupid people in Smerdy's eyes. I don't think FD is writing about Russia, I think he is writing about people, and the universal personal conflict between faith and doubt.



Thu Mar 10, 2011 7:23 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Book Slut

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4111
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1126
Thanked: 1169 times in 878 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post Re: Smerdyakov on Napoleon: Karamazovian defence policy
Smerdyakov reminds me of the fool in Shakespeare's King Lear. He is highly intelligent and perceptive, but is regarded generally as an idiot. As a result he can say things that no one else could get away with. As in Lear, Smerdy makes outrageous political comments like this one about Napoleon, and the comments I mentioned earlier about Genesis. You have to wonder if Dostoyevsky is using Smerdy as a fool device to present ideas that he could not suggest any other way.



Thu Mar 10, 2011 9:32 pm
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Holy Smokes I'm Great

Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1614
Location: Hampton, Ga
Thanks: 240
Thanked: 305 times in 232 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post Re: Smerdyakov on Napoleon: Karamazovian defence policy
D. does present a wide range of political and religious views in this book which are expressed by various characters throughout the story. It's pretty obvious that smerdy is sneaky and tries to be clever but is of incredibly mean descent and is uneducated beyond knowing how to cook and read. His views are radical because, in my opinion, he's so uneducated. He's likely to be highly opinionated and champion whatever takes his fancy. His thoughts on there not being any light on the first day that god made the world came from Ivan if I remember correctly. I don't think these were his own thoughts.

He read Gogol and never smiled, although Gogol can be extremely funny. This book, Evenings on a Farm Near Dikanka, is about peasant life. Smerdy remarks that it's about a lot of things that aren't true. I've never read the book but if anyone knew about peasant life it would be Smerdy. To me, this could possibly mean he rejects or hates peasant life. Anyway, he tries to read a non-fiction book but it's too boring. He doesn't understand the reason behind poetry, thinks a nation can depend on its weather phenomenon for protection, and thinks another nation coming to take Russia over wouldn't be such a bad idea. He hates Russia an everything about it and says so in these exact words. He is extremely vain in respect to his appearance and never steals from his benefactor. Fyodor has complete trust in him.

This character is an enigma. He's 24, extremely proud - possibly too proud to steal. He dates a peasant girl that used to be wealthy and still has her dresses. The most I can tell about Smerdy is that he's trying to come up in life. He doesn't have all the answers, is more than willing to try and figure things out for himself, and is highly independent. He probably feels he is Fyodor's son and wants the respect he deserves but also knows who his Mother is and realizes he will never be a gentleman. He wants to escape stinking Lizaveta and become a success. He's very ambitious.

I still think he represents the upwardly mobile peasant. He is uneducated but ambitious. He is low brow but also displays some virtuous behavior. He wants nice material possessions and cares little for god. He's probably someone that every socialist wants to see squashed. He seems a capitalist to me.



Fri Mar 11, 2011 11:39 am
Profile Email YIM
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:


BookTalk.org Links 
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Info for Authors & Publishers
Featured Book Suggestions
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!
    

Love to talk about books but don't have time for our book discussion forums? For casual book talk join us on Facebook.

Featured Books






BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSBOOKSTRANSCRIPTSOLD FORUMSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY

BOOK FORUMS FOR ALL BOOKS WE HAVE DISCUSSED
Sense and Goodness Without God - by Richard CarrierFrankenstein - by Mary ShelleyThe Big Questions - by Simon BlackburnScience Was Born of Christianity - by Stacy TrasancosThe Happiness Hypothesis - by Jonathan HaidtA Game of Thrones - by George R. R. MartinTempesta's Dream - by Vincent LoCocoWhy Nations Fail - by Daron Acemoglu and James RobinsonThe Drowning Girl - Caitlin R. KiernanThe Consolations of the Forest - by Sylvain TessonThe Complete Heretic's Guide to Western Religion: The Mormons - by David FitzgeraldA Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man - by James JoyceThe Divine Comedy - by Dante AlighieriThe Magic of Reality - by Richard DawkinsDubliners - by James JoyceMy Name Is Red - by Orhan PamukThe World Until Yesterday - by Jared DiamondThe Man Who Was Thursday - by by G. K. ChestertonThe Better Angels of Our Nature by Steven PinkerLord Jim by Joseph ConradThe Hobbit by J. R. R. TolkienThe Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas AdamsAtlas Shrugged by Ayn RandThinking, Fast and Slow - by Daniel KahnemanThe Righteous Mind - by Jonathan HaidtWorld War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War by Max BrooksMoby Dick: or, the Whale by Herman MelvilleA Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer EganLost Memory of Skin: A Novel by Russell BanksThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. KuhnHobbes: Leviathan by Thomas HobbesThe House of the Spirits - by Isabel AllendeArguably: Essays by Christopher HitchensThe Falls: A Novel (P.S.) by Joyce Carol OatesChrist in Egypt by D.M. MurdockThe Glass Bead Game: A Novel by Hermann HesseA Devil's Chaplain by Richard DawkinsThe Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph CampbellThe Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor DostoyevskyThe Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark TwainThe Moral Landscape by Sam HarrisThe Decameron by Giovanni BoccaccioThe Road by Cormac McCarthyThe Grand Design by Stephen HawkingThe Evolution of God by Robert WrightThe Tin Drum by Gunter GrassGood Omens by Neil GaimanPredictably Irrational by Dan ArielyThe Wind-Up Bird Chronicle: A Novel by Haruki MurakamiALONE: Orphaned on the Ocean by Richard Logan & Tere Duperrault FassbenderDon Quixote by Miguel De CervantesMusicophilia by Oliver SacksDiary of a Madman and Other Stories by Nikolai GogolThe Passion of the Western Mind by Richard TarnasThe Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le GuinThe Genius of the Beast by Howard BloomAlice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll Empire of Illusion by Chris HedgesThe Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner The Extended Phenotype by Richard DawkinsSmoke and Mirrors by Neil GaimanThe Selfish Gene by Richard DawkinsWhen Good Thinking Goes Bad by Todd C. RinioloHouse of Leaves by Mark Z. DanielewskiAmerican Gods: A Novel by Neil GaimanPrimates and Philosophers by Frans de WaalThe Enormous Room by E.E. CummingsThe Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar WildeGod Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher HitchensThe Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco Dreams From My Father by Barack Obama Paradise Lost by John Milton Bad Money by Kevin PhillipsThe Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson BurnettGodless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists by Dan BarkerThe Things They Carried by Tim O'BrienThe Limits of Power by Andrew BacevichLolita by Vladimir NabokovOrlando by Virginia Woolf On Being Certain by Robert A. Burton50 reasons people give for believing in a god by Guy P. HarrisonWalden: Or, Life in the Woods by Henry David ThoreauExile and the Kingdom by Albert CamusOur Inner Ape by Frans de WaalYour Inner Fish by Neil ShubinNo Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthyThe Age of American Unreason by Susan JacobyTen Theories of Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson & David HabermanHeart of Darkness by Joseph ConradThe Stuff of Thought by Stephen PinkerA Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled HosseiniThe Lucifer Effect by Philip ZimbardoResponsibility and Judgment by Hannah ArendtInterventions by Noam ChomskyGodless in America by George A. RickerReligious Expression and the American Constitution by Franklyn S. HaimanDeep Economy by Phil McKibbenThe God Delusion by Richard DawkinsThe Third Chimpanzee by Jared DiamondThe Woman in the Dunes by Abe KoboEvolution vs. Creationism by Eugenie C. ScottThe Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael PollanI, Claudius by Robert GravesBreaking The Spell by Daniel C. DennettA Peace to End All Peace by David FromkinThe Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey NiffeneggerThe End of Faith by Sam HarrisEnder's Game by Orson Scott CardThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark HaddonValue and Virtue in a Godless Universe by Erik J. WielenbergThe March by E. L DoctorowThe Ethical Brain by Michael GazzanigaFreethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan JacobyCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared DiamondThe Battle for God by Karen ArmstrongThe Future of Life by Edward O. WilsonWhat is Good? by A. C. GraylingCivilization and Its Enemies by Lee HarrisPale Blue Dot by Carl SaganHow We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God by Michael ShermerLooking for Spinoza by Antonio DamasioLies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them by Al FrankenThe Red Queen by Matt RidleyThe Blank Slate by Stephen PinkerUnweaving the Rainbow by Richard DawkinsAtheism: A Reader edited by S.T. JoshiGlobal Brain by Howard BloomThe Lucifer Principle by Howard BloomGuns, Germs and Steel by Jared DiamondThe Demon-Haunted World by Carl SaganBury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee BrownFuture Shock by Alvin Toffler

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOur Amazon.com SalesMassimo Pigliucci Rationally SpeakingOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism BooksFACTS Book Selections

cron
Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2014. All rights reserved.
Website developed by MidnightCoder.ca
Display Pagerank