I stand by my original statement without the word doubt.
You are absolutely certain they don't exist. But you cannot prove it. That is an excellent example of faith. When will you ever admit that faith is far more a part of your life than logic and reasoning? Each and every one of your belief system axioms depends primarily on faith.
Even the most sound argument on Earth has room for doubt. But you do not doubt your own conviction.
"Inquiry is fatal to certainty." ~ William J. Durant
"Science has proof without any certainty. Creationists have certainty without any proof." ~ Charles Edward Montague
"To be uncertain is to be uncomfortable, but to be certain is to be ridiculous." ~ Chinese Proverb
“Doubt is uncomfortable, certainty is ridiculous.” ~ Voltaire
It is not shenanigans to discredit portions of a book which are obviously wrong. In fact it is empiricism to do so and if your 'belief' system wasn't so closely linked to that of Wright you should be supporting my efforts.
Nearly every item you have an issue with is nothing more than a difference of opinion. It's a matter of interpretation. I agree with you that if you read between the lines regarding Jesus explicitly saying he was the "Son of Man", the thread is tenuous. But how does this relate to the overall book?
You cannot criticize his overall thesis, so you claim that by nitpicking the molehills and proclaiming them to be mountains that the entire book is false. Your attempts are severely biased, and everyone in this discussion but yourself finds it absurd. At least be objective.