| BookTalk.org News |
| • A new forum has been created exclusively for discussing poetry! |
| • We now have a VIDEOS page featuring videos of our authors giving lectures, talks, interviews or engaged in debates. You'll find the link in the top green navigation bar. |
| • Guy P. Harrison, author of "50 reasons people give for believing in a god," has accepted our invitation to either a live chat session or an email interview! |
| Featured Videos |
Jodi Picoult
"My Sister's Keeper"

Robert Burton
"On Being Certain"

More Videos
|
| Show us where you live! |
 |
| Donate & Support BookTalk.org |
Please support our free community by making a credit card donation through our secure PayPal account. We appreciate and depend on the generosity of our members. Thank you!
•
See who supports us
|
|
| Author |
Message |
Mr. Pessimistic  Assistant Professor Silver Contributor


Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 3446
Gender: 
Location: NJ - www.myspace.com/mrpessimistic

|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 8:37 am Post subject: A slight variation on our discussion method
|
|
|
How about we make one of our quarterly discussion a debate style discussion.
We can select two books, on any one topic, that presents different opinions on said topic. Maybe we can all read the two books, or people can choose, or be assigned, which book to read and argue for.
Then we can see about getting BOTH authors into a chat!
The last part may be difficult due to schedules of the authors, but I really like the idea of having a discussion based on two books.
Of course...we would like AND NEED more participation in order for it to work best!
Any ideas or suggestions?
Mr. P. The one thing of which I am positive is that there is much of which to be negative - Mr. P.
The pain in hell has two sides. The kind you can touch with your hand; the kind you can feel in your heart...Scorsese's "Mean Streets"
I came to kick ass and chew Bubble Gum...and I am all out of Bubble Gum - They Live, Roddy Piper |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris OConnor  Rhodes Scholar BookTalk.org Owner

Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 6839
Gender: 
Location: Florida

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Mr. Pessimistic  Assistant Professor Silver Contributor


Joined: 16 Jun 2004
Posts: 3446
Gender: 
Location: NJ - www.myspace.com/mrpessimistic

|
Posted: Fri Jun 17, 2005 1:19 pm Post subject: Re: A slight variation on our discussion method
|
|
|
Yeah...I also thought more participation would be necessary...
Mr. P. The one thing of which I am positive is that there is much of which to be negative - Mr. P.
The pain in hell has two sides. The kind you can touch with your hand; the kind you can feel in your heart...Scorsese's "Mean Streets"
I came to kick ass and chew Bubble Gum...and I am all out of Bubble Gum - They Live, Roddy Piper |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris OConnor  Rhodes Scholar BookTalk.org Owner

Joined: 20 Oct 2000
Posts: 6839
Gender: 
Location: Florida

|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tarav  Stupendously Brilliant BookTalk.org Moderator Silver Contributor


Joined: 19 Jun 2003
Posts: 738
Gender: 
Location: NC
|
Posted: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:08 pm Post subject: Re: A slight variation on our discussion method
|
|
|
| I like this idea, Nick. It might work better if one of the books chosen was a book already read by many members. If we put up a poll asking something like, "What book have you already read that you would like to compare/contast to___________[the other, newer book we want to debate]? Then, if enough people have read a certain book, it would win. Another idea is to choose a book we have already read at booktalk(a past poll winner). Then, have a poll that says something like, "What new book would you like to read that would stimulate debate on this past booktalk selection, __________[a past winner]? In this way, many of us wouldn't actually be reading two books at once. I guess this would still work best with more active members. I think that either of these ideas are a good way of going about it, whenever we decide to try doing two books. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
| Recent Topics |
|
|
|