Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 5397 Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 1300 Thanked: 1334 times in 1039 posts
This will seem like either a naive viewpoint or a quibble about semantics, but I don't necessarily see any cons to our evolutionary heritage. I mean the fact that we have such and such abilities and not others is just the way it had to be for us to adapt for survival. That our 'design' is not in every way so intelligent doesn't mean that, for example, our spinal structure is a 'con.' It obviously served a purpose in creatures like us succeeding. It's much the same for visual perception inconsistencies and cognitive biases. They exist, but unless we can realistically expect that a 'perfect' creature could come about, the only criterion we should use to evaluate our evolutionary heritage is whether our kind survived, which we did in spades. We have what we could call weaknesses (such as our cognitive biases), but since we wouldn't have (would we?) the cognitive strengths without them, it doesn't seem that pro/con is the way to look at what we are.
Well, maybe at some far future point if our numbers decrease drastically due to our own actions (or inactions), we'll then be able to accuse some trait of being a culprit.
_________________ No, it is impossible; it is impossible to convey the life-sensation of any given epoch of one's existence--that which makes its truth, its meaning--its subtle penetrating essence. It is impossible. We live as we dream--alone.
Joined: Oct 2004 Posts: 6726 Location: California
Thanks: 998 Thanked: 1907 times in 1537 posts
Much like some aspects of physics that require a frame of reference, I think weighing our evolutionary heritage also requires one. If you weigh it against the "ideal" sentient creature, we have weaknesses. If you weigh each individual against the average, a bell curve will fill the spectrum. If you weigh us against an ape, our mental portfolio is all very strong. There is also the purpose for which our minds are weighed. For example, if we are contrasted for our ability to procreate, we are successful. If it is our speed at simple math, a computer performs better than us. At pattern recognition, we are without equal. At discovering the truth of our reality, we have a few weaknesses.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.