Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME FORUMS BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Mon Nov 24, 2014 4:19 am

<< Week of November 24, 2014 >>
Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday
24 Day Month

25 Day Month

26 Day Month

27 Day Month

28 Day Month

29 Day Month

30 Day Month





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 
Part I - Appendix A: Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
BookTalk.org Hall of Fame

BookTalk.org Owner
Diamond Contributor 3

Joined: May 2002
Posts: 14180
Location: Florida
Thanks: 2130
Thanked: 814 times in 646 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)
Highscores: 8

Post Part I - Appendix A: Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial
Part I - Appendix A: Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial

Please use this thread for discussing Part I - Appendix A: Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial, found on pages 59 through 68.



Sat May 02, 2009 1:00 am
Profile Email YIM WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Junior

Gold Contributor

Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 324
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanks: 4
Thanked: 6 times in 6 posts
Gender: Female
Country: Canada (ca)

Post Proving intentionality and anthropomorphism
I took a couple of degrees in Anthropology and one of the hard and fast “no-nos” was speaking anthropomorphically. So I found this “appendix” interesting. I think it is often beneficial to carefully go against deeply rooted “rules” because otherwise we never explore why we have the rules and what they do for us.

As I understood it all those years ago, the rule against anthropomorphism was based on the idea that we humans have a very strong tendency to read the world as if it were fundamentally like us and then, when it doesn’t live up to our moral/intellectual/behavioural standards, to think the world to be a defective place. This most definitely gets in the way of understanding.

When you read colonial literature, or early ethnography, that’s often what you get. It’s as if they went out to get to know the “natives” and found instead deficient Englishmen (or Frenchmen, or Americans). So I think the rule against anthropomorphism a basically good one. It goes astray, however, if you go out to get to know the natives and force yourself to not think of them as anything like you – so therefore they are not yet proven to be human. That (as history shows) carries its own risks.

So I think that de Waal is right to reopen the question of its usefulness. On page 61 of my text he says:

“Inasmuch as the absence of intentionality is as difficult to prove as its presence, and inasmuch as no one has ever proven that animals differ fundamentally from people in this regard, it is hard to see the scientific basis for such contrasting assumptions.”

Proving intentionality’s presence…if you take the open mind of anti-anthropomorphism far enough, can we really prove human morality or intentionality? I know I say that hitting these keys was intentional, but can I prove it? And if I can’t what does that say?

I think there may be certain assumptions we simply have to make in order to facilitate understanding (although all assumptions must remain open to poking and prodding). Assuming "natives" are human is one and I suspect assuming that what we humans can do is predicated on what other primates can do is another.

Agree or not?


_________________
I've always found it rather exciting to remember that there is a difference between what we experience and what we think it means.


Mon May 25, 2009 9:17 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
One more post ought to do it.

BookTalk.org Moderator
Gold Contributor 2

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 3255
Location: NC
Thanks: 1124
Thanked: 1174 times in 886 posts
Gender: Male

Post Re: Proving intentionality and anthropomorphism
MaryLupin wrote:
As I understood it all those years ago, the rule against anthropomorphism was based on the idea that we humans have a very strong tendency to read the world as if it were fundamentally like us and then, when it doesn’t live up to our moral/intellectual/behavioural standards, to think the world to be a defective place. This most definitely gets in the way of understanding.


Thanks for this very interesting post, MaryLupin.

I'm not reading de Waal's book currently, but last week when my wife and I were at the Bronx Zoo we were quite taken with the African Wild Dogs. These pack animals and are said to be ruthless killers, but they also remarkably cohesive in their social groups. (I would imagine humans evolved much the same way during their hunter-gatherer phase.) Food sharing is a critical part of pack life. The dogs have been observed to care for their injured and sick, returning after a hunt to feed them or defend their access to a carcass. We might be tempted to see this behavior as altruistic, but is probably guided by Dawkins' "selfish gene." In my brief few minutes of research I've read that if the pack is on the move it will abandon those who cannot keep up. Survival is always the key.

William James (Henry James' brother) in his seminal book, Principles of Psychology (published 30 years after The Origin of Species), discusses our tendency to believe that human beings are above nature. We believe only animals are ruled by "instinct" and that humans are ruled primarily by "reason". But James took the opposite view, arguing that human behavior is more flexibly intelligent than that of other animals precisely because we have more instincts than they do, not fewer. We tend to be blind to the existence of these instincts, however, because they work so well, because they process information so effortlessly and automatically. This tendency of ours to make the "natural seem strange" seems to be the same anthropomorphism that MaryLupin describes above.

James' work is one of the keystones of modern evolutionary psychology. Here's an excellent web site.

http://www.psych.ucsb.edu/research/cep/primer.html

William James wrote:
"It takes...a mind debauched by learning to carry the process of making the natural seem strange, so far as to ask for the why of any instinctive human act. To the metaphysician alone can such questions occur as: Why do we smile, when pleased, and not scowl? Why are we unable to talk to a crowd as we talk to a single friend? Why does a particular maiden turn our wits so upside-down? The common man can only say, Of course we smile, of course our heart palpitates at the sight of the crowd, of course we love the maiden, that beautiful soul clad in that perfect form, so palpably and flagrantly made for all eternity to be loved!

And so, probably, does each animal feel about the particular things it tends to do in the presence of particular objects. ... To the lion it is the lioness which is made to be loved; to the bear, the she-bear. To the broody hen the notion would probably seem monstrous that there should be a creature in the world to whom a nestful of eggs was not the utterly fascinating and precious and never-to-be-too-much-sat-upon object which it is to her.

Thus we may be sure that, however mysterious some animals' instincts may appear to us, our instincts will appear no less mysterious to them." (William James, 1890)


_________________
-Geo
Question everything


Mon May 25, 2009 10:45 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor

Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4234
Location: Canberra
Thanks: 1168
Thanked: 1221 times in 918 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Australia (au)

Post Re: Proving intentionality and anthropomorphism
MaryLupin wrote:
On page 61 of my text he says:

“Inasmuch as the absence of intentionality is as difficult to prove as its presence, and inasmuch as no one has ever proven that animals differ fundamentally from people in this regard, it is hard to see the scientific basis for such contrasting assumptions.”

Proving intentionality’s presence…if you take the open mind of anti-anthropomorphism far enough, can we really prove human morality or intentionality? I know I say that hitting these keys was intentional, but can I prove it? And if I can’t what does that say?


Intentionality is a philosophical concept discussed by Edmund Husserl, the founder of phenomenology. Husserl asks how human intentions can be assessed as phenomena. Animal intentions can equally be assessed as phenomena. Yes, human intentions are formed by reason, but they also derive from instinct. Geo makes a good point regarding the dogs' altruism as evidence of a selfish gene. Dogs are intentional in caring for the weak, but this behaviour is compatible with a primarily instinctive/genetic rather than a primarily rational decision process.

A related word is to intentionality is 'intentional'. It is used to describe behaviour informed by a set of intentions, including social and political goals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Husserl says
Quote:
Another important element that Husserl took over from Brentano is intentionality, the notion that the main characteristic of consciousness is that it is always intentional. While often simplistically summarised as "aboutness" or the relationship between mental acts and the external world, Brentano defined it as the main characteristic of mental phenomena, by which they could be distinguished from physical phenomena. Every mental phenomenon, every psychological act, has a content, is directed at an object (the intentional object). Every belief, desire, etc. has an object that it is about: the believed, the wanted. Brentano used the expression "intentional inexistence" to indicate the status of the objects of thought in the mind. The property of being intentional, of having an intentional object, was the key feature to distinguish mental phenomena and physical phenomena, because physical phenomena lack intentionality altogether.



Tue May 26, 2009 12:34 am
Profile Email WWW
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Likes the book better than the movie


Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 825
Location: Wyse Fork, NC
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: None specified

Post Re: Proving intentionality and anthropomorphism
Quote:
Proving intentionality’s presence…, can we really prove human morality or intentionality?


Quote:
. . .Brentano is intentionality, the notion that the main characteristic of consciousness is that it is always intentional.


Yes, intentionality is an objective phenomenon -- the style that discloses the hidden background of attitude and values.



Tue May 26, 2009 7:00 am
Profile
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Almost Comfortable


Joined: May 2009
Posts: 18
Location: Hiram, GA
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: None specified

Post Anthropomorphism and anthropodenial
I loved this book, and I don't see anything wrong with anthropomorphism. I have five cats and I anthropomorphicize with them all the time. I attribute human thoughts and feelings to them; they all have different personalities and identities, just like people. They are my best friends. I don't think that you can really care about animal welfare if you think anthropomorphism is wrong or inappropriate. Those who feel uncomfortable with anthropomorhpism (and this does not apply to me), may have self-esteem or control issues whereby they need to believe that they are better or smarter than animals. They may consciously or unconsciously applaud the fact that they have complete control of their pets' lives. I am a microbiologist and not an animal researcher, so to me, it doesn't matter whether animals act like humans with intent or not. I argue that they are the best of companions (having been married and divorced), and I am sure that I have learned more from them than they have from me.

I think we have to discern the difference between anthropomorphism during a research study (where you are trying to find truth - how much and to what degree do animals think like us) and anthropomorphism in our daily lives with our pets. In my opinion, the more we consider animals to be like us, the better we treat and love them, and the more responsibility and obligation we feel towards them. And that is only a positive thing. I agree wholeheartedly with Gandhi that, "The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated." Even in the US, we have a long way to go.



Wed May 27, 2009 9:32 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor 2

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4962
Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 1089
Thanked: 1060 times in 828 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
I can see an advantage in being careful about anthropomorphizing. We need to try to understand what, in a dog's nature, is distinct from ours and perhaps unique. We don't do justice to animals if we merely transfer human qualities to them. It may reflect our limitations, our lack of real knowledge and insight into other natures, when we try to make other animals too much like ourselves. The alternative to doing this should be something more subtle, though, than just saying that other animals are automatons, acting on command of instinct.

I thought de Waal did a good job in his essay of sketching out the development of anthropodenial. He didn't mention, though, the influence of Christianity, which in its separating of humans from all other animals created the belief that relatedness to animals was impossible. It was an affront to our cherished uniqueness to be told that we and apes have a common ancestor, and it still is an affront to many people.


_________________
Man is an animal suspended in webs of significance that he himself has spun.

Clifford Geertz


Sat Jun 20, 2009 10:00 pm
Profile Email
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average. 



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:

Recent Posts 
Why Do So Many Have Trouble Believing In Evolution?

Mon Nov 24, 2014 3:59 am

lehelvandor

Do you have a quote to share? Funny? Positive? Thought Provoking?

Mon Nov 24, 2014 2:29 am

Crystalline

Introduction

Mon Nov 24, 2014 1:38 am

Robert Tulip

Releasing a Book in Serial Format... Thoughts? Opinions?

Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:50 pm

Suzanne

Is God the epitome of both good and evil?

Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:16 pm

Movie Nerd

If you were God, would you give humanity moral free will?

Sun Nov 23, 2014 8:56 pm

Flann 5

Free Today Only - Lovers, Players, & The Seducer eBook: J. A. JACKSON: Kindle Store

Sun Nov 23, 2014 5:16 pm

J A Jackson

New Freebie, Romantic Suspense

Sun Nov 23, 2014 3:48 pm

katekelly

Faith closes the mind. It is pure idol worship.

Sun Nov 23, 2014 2:19 pm

Movie Nerd

Christmas gift for my brother in-law: in the style of the iron druid

Sun Nov 23, 2014 2:18 pm

Chris OConnor

Negotiating with terrorists for the release of hostages?

Sun Nov 23, 2014 2:02 pm

ClosetScribe

Savanna's Treasure: Animal Friendships, But Not Your Usual Picture Book Read

Sun Nov 23, 2014 12:14 pm

DianeD+

Why is there something and not nothing?

Sun Nov 23, 2014 12:13 pm

Interbane

Many thanks for having me, Joe

Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:08 am

Taylor

Visit To A Doctor

Sun Nov 23, 2014 10:00 am

mightynvaliant

Do you EAT while you READ?

Sun Nov 23, 2014 9:52 am

lucia_salemi

"What Book Changed Your Mind?"

Sun Nov 23, 2014 8:54 am

Movie Nerd

Why is evolution by natural selection a scientific explanation for alien life?

Sun Nov 23, 2014 8:50 am

Movie Nerd

a picture book about refugees

Sun Nov 23, 2014 8:13 am

lucia_salemi

Renewable energy - the old chestnut, puréed

Sun Nov 23, 2014 4:17 am

lehelvandor


BookTalk.org Links 
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Info for Authors & Publishers
Featured Book Suggestions
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!
    

Love to talk about books but don't have time for our book discussion forums? For casual book talk join us on Facebook.

Featured Books

Poll

Yes  66%  [2]
No  33%  [1]
Total votes: 3

Books by New Authors

Visual Help for Getting Started


Top Posters

Of all time: Chris OConnor (14180), Interbane (5583), DWill (4962), stahrwe (4610), Robert Tulip (4234), Mr. Pessimistic (3542), johnson1010 (3326), geo (3255), ant (3079), Penelope (2969), Saffron (2859), Suzanne (2479), Frank 013 (2021), Dissident Heart (1796), bleachededen (1680), President Camacho (1614), Ophelia (1543), Dexter (1451), tat tvam asi (1298), youkrst (1287)

Of the last 24 hrs: ant (18), Movie Nerd (18), lehelvandor (9), Chris OConnor (7), Flann 5 (6), Interbane (3), Robert Tulip (3), Dexter (3), Jokermagician (3), Gnostic Bishop (3), Suzanne (2), Crystalline (2), lucia_salemi (2), mightynvaliant (2), David Rain (2), ClosetScribe (2), CoolSummer (1), J A Jackson (1), katekelly (1), alfifi (1)




BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSBOOKSTRANSCRIPTSOLD FORUMSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY

BOOK FORUMS FOR ALL BOOKS WE HAVE DISCUSSED
Atheist Mind, Humanist Heart - by Lex Bayer and John FigdorSense and Goodness Without God - by Richard CarrierFrankenstein - by Mary ShelleyThe Big Questions - by Simon BlackburnScience Was Born of Christianity - by Stacy TrasancosThe Happiness Hypothesis - by Jonathan HaidtA Game of Thrones - by George R. R. MartinTempesta's Dream - by Vincent LoCocoWhy Nations Fail - by Daron Acemoglu and James RobinsonThe Drowning Girl - Caitlin R. KiernanThe Consolations of the Forest - by Sylvain TessonThe Complete Heretic's Guide to Western Religion: The Mormons - by David FitzgeraldA Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man - by James JoyceThe Divine Comedy - by Dante AlighieriThe Magic of Reality - by Richard DawkinsDubliners - by James JoyceMy Name Is Red - by Orhan PamukThe World Until Yesterday - by Jared DiamondThe Man Who Was Thursday - by by G. K. ChestertonThe Better Angels of Our Nature by Steven PinkerLord Jim by Joseph ConradThe Hobbit by J. R. R. TolkienThe Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas AdamsAtlas Shrugged by Ayn RandThinking, Fast and Slow - by Daniel KahnemanThe Righteous Mind - by Jonathan HaidtWorld War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War by Max BrooksMoby Dick: or, the Whale by Herman MelvilleA Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer EganLost Memory of Skin: A Novel by Russell BanksThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. KuhnHobbes: Leviathan by Thomas HobbesThe House of the Spirits - by Isabel AllendeArguably: Essays by Christopher HitchensThe Falls: A Novel (P.S.) by Joyce Carol OatesChrist in Egypt by D.M. MurdockThe Glass Bead Game: A Novel by Hermann HesseA Devil's Chaplain by Richard DawkinsThe Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph CampbellThe Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor DostoyevskyThe Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark TwainThe Moral Landscape by Sam HarrisThe Decameron by Giovanni BoccaccioThe Road by Cormac McCarthyThe Grand Design by Stephen HawkingThe Evolution of God by Robert WrightThe Tin Drum by Gunter GrassGood Omens by Neil GaimanPredictably Irrational by Dan ArielyThe Wind-Up Bird Chronicle: A Novel by Haruki MurakamiALONE: Orphaned on the Ocean by Richard Logan & Tere Duperrault FassbenderDon Quixote by Miguel De CervantesMusicophilia by Oliver SacksDiary of a Madman and Other Stories by Nikolai GogolThe Passion of the Western Mind by Richard TarnasThe Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le GuinThe Genius of the Beast by Howard BloomAlice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll Empire of Illusion by Chris HedgesThe Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner The Extended Phenotype by Richard DawkinsSmoke and Mirrors by Neil GaimanThe Selfish Gene by Richard DawkinsWhen Good Thinking Goes Bad by Todd C. RinioloHouse of Leaves by Mark Z. DanielewskiAmerican Gods: A Novel by Neil GaimanPrimates and Philosophers by Frans de WaalThe Enormous Room by E.E. CummingsThe Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar WildeGod Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher HitchensThe Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco Dreams From My Father by Barack Obama Paradise Lost by John Milton Bad Money by Kevin PhillipsThe Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson BurnettGodless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists by Dan BarkerThe Things They Carried by Tim O'BrienThe Limits of Power by Andrew BacevichLolita by Vladimir NabokovOrlando by Virginia Woolf On Being Certain by Robert A. Burton50 reasons people give for believing in a god by Guy P. HarrisonWalden: Or, Life in the Woods by Henry David ThoreauExile and the Kingdom by Albert CamusOur Inner Ape by Frans de WaalYour Inner Fish by Neil ShubinNo Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthyThe Age of American Unreason by Susan JacobyTen Theories of Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson & David HabermanHeart of Darkness by Joseph ConradThe Stuff of Thought by Stephen PinkerA Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled HosseiniThe Lucifer Effect by Philip ZimbardoResponsibility and Judgment by Hannah ArendtInterventions by Noam ChomskyGodless in America by George A. RickerReligious Expression and the American Constitution by Franklyn S. HaimanDeep Economy by Phil McKibbenThe God Delusion by Richard DawkinsThe Third Chimpanzee by Jared DiamondThe Woman in the Dunes by Abe KoboEvolution vs. Creationism by Eugenie C. ScottThe Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael PollanI, Claudius by Robert GravesBreaking The Spell by Daniel C. DennettA Peace to End All Peace by David FromkinThe Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey NiffeneggerThe End of Faith by Sam HarrisEnder's Game by Orson Scott CardThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark HaddonValue and Virtue in a Godless Universe by Erik J. WielenbergThe March by E. L DoctorowThe Ethical Brain by Michael GazzanigaFreethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan JacobyCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared DiamondThe Battle for God by Karen ArmstrongThe Future of Life by Edward O. WilsonWhat is Good? by A. C. GraylingCivilization and Its Enemies by Lee HarrisPale Blue Dot by Carl SaganHow We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God by Michael ShermerLooking for Spinoza by Antonio DamasioLies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them by Al FrankenThe Red Queen by Matt RidleyThe Blank Slate by Stephen PinkerUnweaving the Rainbow by Richard DawkinsAtheism: A Reader edited by S.T. JoshiGlobal Brain by Howard BloomThe Lucifer Principle by Howard BloomGuns, Germs and Steel by Jared DiamondThe Demon-Haunted World by Carl SaganBury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee BrownFuture Shock by Alvin Toffler

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOur Amazon.com SalesMassimo Pigliucci Rationally SpeakingOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism BooksFACTS Book Selections

Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2014. All rights reserved.
Website developed by MidnightCoder.ca
Display Pagerank