Online reading group and book discussion forum
  HOME FORUMS BOOKS LINKS DONATE ADVERTISE CONTACT  
View unanswered posts | View active topics It is currently Wed Aug 20, 2014 11:19 pm




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Ch. 1: Introduction: The Panic of August 
Author Message
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Brilliant

Bronze Contributor 2

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 674
Thanks: 17
Thanked: 20 times in 15 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Canada (ca)

Post 
Yes, derivitives are know, or at leat they were to seemingly pull money out of nowhere. The allusion to the lottery or casino is apt indeed.

:book:



Sat Jan 10, 2009 5:59 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor 2

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4944
Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 1081
Thanked: 1040 times in 813 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Thanks for the resource. I'm still not sure what those who buy these derivatives are getting, so some of this mystery remains for me. Is all this stuff a little bit immoral, or is that my puritanism speaking?

I was thinking about my last post, and one thing I'd add is that we common people are not necessarily the victims of the financial mess, the biggest part of which was caused by bad mortgage debt (right?). We might be part creators. I mean that in any situation when the final decision is ours, we can't say that some "predatory" lender was responsible. If a lender tells me I qualify on $80,000 annual income for a $300,000 house with little down, it's still my fault if I sign the contract and then can't make payments later on. I've taken on too much housing expense relative to my income, and I should know this. The gleam was in my own eyes.



Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:44 pm
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Brilliant

Bronze Contributor 2

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 674
Thanks: 17
Thanked: 20 times in 15 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Canada (ca)

Post 
I am interested to what degree the American economic system with all its financial instruments reflects other characteristics of the "Americans" as people and as an empire - if you will excuse the blanket cultural stereotyping.

:book:



Tue Jan 13, 2009 10:31 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Thread Flintstone

Platinum Contributor

Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 887
Thanks: 122
Thanked: 191 times in 155 posts
Gender: None specified

Post 
DWill wrote:
Thanks for the resource. I'm still not sure what those who buy these derivatives are getting, so some of this mystery remains for me. Is all this stuff a little bit immoral, or is that my puritanism speaking?




As I understand it, investors do not "get" anything when they engage in the derivatives market or in the related futures market in a material sense. They enter into a contract, so they are acquiring a contractual right for a certain price. That's all they are getting, a right. The value of the right will vary over time according to changes in the market for rights of that type and so the contractual right will be bought and sold according to what the investors believe is in their best interest.



Wed Jan 14, 2009 1:44 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Likes the book better than the movie


Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 825
Location: Wyse Fork, NC
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: None specified

Post 
giselle wrote:
As I understand it, investors do not "get" anything when they engage in the derivatives market or in the related futures market in a material sense.


I thought real estate derivatives were like bonds and paid interest. Others were more speculative, like options.

Tom



Wed Jan 14, 2009 8:44 am
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor 2

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4944
Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 1081
Thanked: 1040 times in 813 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Grim wrote:
I am interested to what degree the American economic system with all its financial instruments reflects other characteristics of the "Americans" as people and as an empire - if you will excuse the blanket cultural stereotyping.

I'm interested in that, too. Phillips does give Great Britian some "credit" for financial innovation, too, though, back in the 80s.

A guy was on public radio the other day talking about the continuities of the current crisis with other episodes of financial crashing in earlier American history (pre-Depression). Maybe there is a strong American character link in all of this.


_________________
Man is an animal suspended in webs of significance that he himself has spun.

Clifford Geertz


Wed Jan 14, 2009 10:29 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Holy Smokes I'm Great

Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1614
Location: Hampton, Ga
Thanks: 240
Thanked: 305 times in 232 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
First off, this book seems like it was well researched, written hastily, and has an agenda.

I'm pleased with the book candidness about issues concerning the worst president ever, little georgy bush and his 'Imperial hubris'. Understatements and misstatements are the hallmarks of his administration. Mission Accomplished georgy!

Leadership can't be blamed for this is garbage. Republicans have a long history of running up debt and allowing big business supreme leniency and succor. Look at the national debt produced by Regan, Bush, and Bush. It's fact. One after another. R-e-a-d m-y l-i-p-s : THEY SUCK.

Electing any member of either party "wouldn't be prudent."

You know this man is a political writer. It shows in his work despite his confession and although I am with him 110% - it takes away from his work. Any emotional arguments or heavily opinionated views in non-fiction writing undermine the non-bias, factual, make your own assumptions style of non-fiction writing that I prefer. To read this book is to hear a man, complete with disheveled hair and clothes, beat a stack of papers while standing on a soap-box screaming we need to change or else.

Where is the calm, matter of fact style of the person who really knows what it's all about. I feel like I'm being pulled rather than led. This man is a heated outsider for sure. Well, at least he was able to pump out another book toting his particular views.... not that I don't share them - which i do very very very much.

Anyway, enough about his writing style. It is what it is.

The securitization schemes seem to be where everything went wrong. I probably have this completely wrong as I don't know anything about this.. but it seems like bad mortgages were grouped together and sold based on some value - the veracity of the value, I'm sure, was questionable.

Then, as some derivatives are based on loans - some people might have gambled that the groupings would be worth a certain amount at a future time - in essence they bet on the value of the loans or how likely people were to pay them back. The banks sold loans to people they otherwise wouldn't because they also sold the risk to the people who bought derivatives.

At least, this is what I'm getting so far. This guess is akin to Colonel Mustard did it in the library with the candle stick.

The debt that this country is accumulating without producing is a no brainer for anyone on a fixed budget. I've been thinking about this ever since we went to Iraq. I've looked at our spending - it was set to be trillions - and no one was a bit concerned.

This is the big house doling out the cash - the house that all our houses are inside of - that is racking up a huge debt. It made me extremely nervous to see our money being spent so stupidly. It was a huge transfer of wealth. To know that the oil companies were pissed and colluded to raise prices is questionable, though truly believable and justifiable.

I'd like to think we did it to ourselves. Oil is a scarce resource and there was money to be had. If the financial sector got this out of control, what was to stop them from making exorbitant sums on oil?

Also...what better way to not pay off a debt than to raise inflation? You could have a war for 1/2 what it cost if you just devalued that hell out of the currency. I'm not saying that this is what happened but why not? I wouldn't put it past little georgy.

The part of the book where it talks about pegging our currency to oil was poignant in Phillips argument that finance is what we're sure is the future of America, not manufacturing. I'm not at all convinced that finance isn't the future. Sure there was a hickup but that's nothing a little oversight can't fix.

Poor companies sell their natural resources, the next rich sell what's produced from natural resources, the next manufacture, the next high technology, and probably the last is finance. We're trying to ensure hegemony by controlling the world's money. That's not at all a bad thing.

By pegging our currency to oil we raised the value of our currency. I believe it's called the dutch disease. It was named because the dutch did something similar that destroyed its manufacturing sector. We probably did the same thing but on purpose - the disease was self inflicted.

Except, the deals coming undone because we aren't keeping the dollar strong enough. We're sliding backwards. Maybe this is what needs to happen, maybe not. I don't know.... and I'm not convinced that Phillips knows either.

"Twenty First century risk turned out to be spread and distributed in a negative rather than a positive way." Money was being created that really wasn't there. Incomes were falsely stated, loans were given out based on that information, bad loans like these were grouped together, sold, and maybe insurance was taken out on them. Risk was being spread by banks, privateers, and the insurance industry. Everyone had a piece of sh*t on their plate.

Meanwhile, houses are getting built and the economy is booming because of all this IMAGINARY money. The American dream was coming true for almost everyone. - except those duped into buying these derivatives.

The gamble was fine - the odds weren't as described... At least this is what I'm seeing.

I think the reason no one new was because of it being too late. The consequences were too severe. It would be like the Fed saying "America is broke" the day after 9/11 happened. I think the market was doomed and there was almost nothing that could be done to begin a reversal - there was only time to ride out the storm. The pessimists, COULD and probably are wrong - they're probably overstating a very minor problem - it can't be that bad. It's our economy's equivalent to global warming. The costs to change are just tooooooo high.



Wed Jan 14, 2009 7:10 pm
Profile Email YIM
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Brilliant

Bronze Contributor 2

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 674
Thanks: 17
Thanked: 20 times in 15 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Canada (ca)

Post 
"It's also 'bad' to promote an overbearing financialization of America's economy and culture, lesser versions of which in both U.S. and world history have led to extremes of income and wealth polarization, a culture of money worship, and overt philosophic embrace of speculation and wide-open markets."

Here the open market is identified for the philosophy not the precise science it is. The pseudo-scientific maxim that the markets are self-regulating natural systems, where participants engage collective intelligence to foresee downturns or poorly designed instruments motivated through self-interest and personal preservation. Depending on irrational humans to behave rationally seems to have its short comings.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reflexivity_(social_theory)

DWill wrote:
I'm interested in that, too. Phillips does give Great Britian some "credit" for financial innovation, too, though, back in the 80s.


"The British acted first, electing in 1979 a Conservative Party government that chose free-market lioness Margaret Thatcher as prime minister. She immediately embraced a program of minimally fettered capitalism, and over more than a decade in office largely implemented it."

I feel that financial innovation will increasingly become a dirty word, essentially meaning a new way to profit that has not yet been fully understood or controlled by the regulators. The only "credit" I see Phillips giving to others comes in the form of a warning to the present day Americans about the factors and causes of fading global economic/cultural/military power dominance. Perhaps you can provide a quote or example at your own leisure, or is the quotation of "credit" meant to indicate your sarcasm?

:book:



Wed Jan 14, 2009 9:36 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor 2

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4944
Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 1081
Thanked: 1040 times in 813 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Yes, those are the quotation marks of sarcasm.


_________________
Man is an animal suspended in webs of significance that he himself has spun.

Clifford Geertz


Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:05 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
pets endangered by possible book avalanche

Gold Contributor 2

Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4944
Location: Berryville, Virginia
Thanks: 1081
Thanked: 1040 times in 813 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Comacho"You know this man is a political writer. It shows in his work despite his confession and although I am with him 110% - it takes away from his work. Any emotional arguments or heavily opinionated views in non-fiction writing undermine the non-bias, factual, make your own assumptions style of non-fiction writing that I prefer. To read this book is to hear a man, complete with disheveled hair and clothes, beat a stack of papers while standing on a soap-box screaming we need to change or else.
My reaction is different. I didn't hear the partisan tone that you did. I still see Phillips as hard to classify politically; in this--and reputedly in his other books--he bashes liberals and conservatives both, doesn't he? Political party doesn't seem to matter to him much. Notice how he deflates the lone Democratic administration of the past 30 years as he also skewers the Republicans. Like you, I've always focused on the government's yearly deficit and total debt, but Phillips tells us that the private debt that has metastisized is the origin of our current crisis (which of course he isn't reporting on, but he must be satisfied to see his predictions borne out.) It was Clinton, according to him, who really greased the wheels of the financial industry and got into bed with these guys (yeah, where are all the women?) in a major way, he says in Chapter 2, resulting in the enormous growth of private debt. The success Clinton had in balancing the budget in his last year was largely attributable to tax revenue from all the high finance.

I'm glad Phillips has a strong point of view in the book and doesn't try to be merely a reporter. This stuff is not in itself that interesting to me and badly needs some coloring.


_________________
Man is an animal suspended in webs of significance that he himself has spun.

Clifford Geertz


Thu Jan 15, 2009 9:24 am
Profile Email
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Holy Smokes I'm Great

Silver Contributor

Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1614
Location: Hampton, Ga
Thanks: 240
Thanked: 305 times in 232 posts
Gender: Male
Country: United States (us)

Post 
Partisan or not, he has an agenda - and it's a noble one!

What I've received so far:

1. Phillips seems to be in favor of the peak oil theory (a theory that's been tested and verified) and is concerned with who supplies it.

2. He's against dynastic politics.

3. He seems to be against spending in great excess of production (public/private debt).

4. He sees the Iraq war as a tragic blunder for American stability/prosperity and world peace.

5. He's concerned with the power of special interest groups, one of them being the religious right.

6. He sees the financial institution as getting too much of the GNP pie.

7. He wants us to think of the possibility of a devaluation of the dollar as it is pegged to oil.

There's more that I feel is implicit in this guy's writing.

The intro seemed to be a rant. It was a good rant. I enjoyed it a lot. I agree with this guy about most of the things he said.




:ninjafist:



Thu Jan 15, 2009 10:32 am
Profile Email YIM
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Brilliant

Bronze Contributor 2

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 674
Thanks: 17
Thanked: 20 times in 15 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Canada (ca)

Post 
Yes, while it is true that there is nothing astoundingly revelationary in Phillips writing, to this point anyway, you defiantly come away from his work much better informed than you may from many other sources. The style of this book recalls for me the writings of Bacevich in The Limits of Power - a deep respect for the macro-historical events that have led up to our present but are all too often easily dismissed or not learned.

Connections are made which seem obvious after their reading, prior to however; they were not even remotely related.

Another comment I have been making to myself is how Phillips appears to repeat himself. How many time is he going to say that certain experts (the slim/wide majority perhaps) have seen this all coming? How many times is he going to repeat that growth based on debt is an unstable way to develop an economy? I realized that all signs he brings up have pointed to several inescapable conclusions, conclusions which although not radical by any means at least deserve the concerted attention and a willingness to understand deeper exactly what causes and effects we are presently dealing with.

:book:



Thu Jan 15, 2009 7:51 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Brilliant

Bronze Contributor 2

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 674
Thanks: 17
Thanked: 20 times in 15 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Canada (ca)

Post 
And I suppose the best place to look will be the author's own thesis for his book:

"It is the thesis of this book that far-reaching economic and political events and consequences began to unfold in midsummer's melee-developments that at least in part followed the direction that many specialists had forseen - regarding U.S. housing prices, credit-bubble risk, the instability of so many financial innovations never crisis-tested, the ever-more-apparent inadequacy of global oil production, the related vulnerability of the dollar, and, behind it all, the false assurances of American 'imperial' hubris."

So many topics to choose from it is hard to imagine that anyone could not find anything to take away from this book. Of course there seem to be no stunning conclusions yet, meerly a furthered literation of the reality of risk Americans have been telling themselves and each other would eventually catch up to the pace of unconstrained development today.

"Banks, hedge funds, and lenders behaved as if home prices always rise, borrowers never miss a payment, and companies never blunder into bankrupcy."

I suppose it would be topical to point out the difference in the statement between behaving and believing. Where there is the misfortunate illusion that because things work today they can forever. An overt reliance on poorly rationalized certainty by a large enough majority, or perhaps minority, to make the disastrous causal difference.

"If markets are not always rational, the same can be said of their willingness to anticipate bad news."

:book:



Sun Jan 18, 2009 3:13 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Brilliant

Bronze Contributor 2

Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 674
Thanks: 17
Thanked: 20 times in 15 posts
Gender: Male
Country: Canada (ca)

Post 
A great quick and simple explaination of derivatives from author Niall Ferguson

Quote:
Drunk on Derivatives

Do you, however, know about the second-order effects of this crisis in the markets for derivatives? Do you in fact know what a derivative is? Once excoriated by Warren Buffett as “financial weapons of mass destruction,” derivatives are what make this crisis both unique and unfathomable in its ramifications. To understand what they are, you need, literally, to go back to the future.

For a farmer planting a crop, nothing is more crucial than the future price it will fetch after it has been harvested and taken to market. A futures contract allows him to protect himself by committing a merchant to buy his crop when it comes to market at a price agreed upon when the seeds are being planted. If the market price on the day of delivery is lower than expected, the farmer is protected.

The earliest forms of protection for farmers were known as forward contracts, which were simply bilateral agreements between seller and buyer. A true futures contract, however, is a standardized instrument issued by a futures exchange and hence tradable. With the development of a standard “to arrive” futures contract, along with a set of rules to enforce settlement and, finally, an effective clearinghouse, the first true futures market was born.

Because they are derived from the value of underlying assets, all futures contracts are forms of derivatives. Closely related, though distinct from futures, are the contracts known as options. In essence, the buyer of a “call” option has the right, but not the obligation, to buy an agreed-upon quantity of a particular commodity or financial asset from the seller (“writer”) of the option at a certain time (the expiration date) for a certain price (known as the “strike price”). Clearly, the buyer of a call option expects the price of the underlying instrument to rise in the future. When the price passes the agreed-upon strike price, the option is “in the money”—and so is the smart guy who bought it. A “put” option is just the opposite: the buyer has the right but not the obligation to sell an agreed-upon quantity of something to the seller of the option at an agreed-upon price.

A third kind of derivative is the interest-rate “swap,” which is effectively a bet between two parties on the future path of interest rates. A pure interest-rate swap allows two parties already receiving interest payments literally to swap them, allowing someone receiving a variable rate of interest to exchange it for a fixed rate, in case interest rates decline. A credit-default swap (C.D.S.), meanwhile, offers protection against a company’s defaulting on its bonds.

There was a time when derivatives were standardized instruments traded on exchanges such as the Chicago Board of Trade. Now, however, the vast proportion are custom-made and sold “over the counter” (O.T.C.), often by banks, which charge attractive commissions for their services, but also by insurance companies (notably A.I.G.). According to the Bank for International Settlements, the total notional amounts outstanding of O.T.C. derivative contracts—arranged on an ad hoc basis between two parties—reached a staggering $596 trillion in December 2007, with a gross market value of just over $14.5 trillion.


:book:



Sun Jan 18, 2009 7:57 pm
Profile
User avatar
Years of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membershipYears of membership
Pop up Book Fanatic


Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 10
Thanks: 0
Thanked: 0 time in 0 post
Gender: None specified

Post 
I also am not an economist, and the various financial instruments are bewildering. But the most confusing thing about the writing is the way Phillips jumps back and forth in time. He does this on a large scale, switching from 2007 to 19th-century Britain to 18th-century Holland. He also does it on a small scale, describing events in May as if they followed events in July.

Camacho called it a "rant," and I had the same impression: it's off-the-cuff, disorganized, and passionate; it's entertaining but also hard to follow in spots. I expect that future chapters will be a bit more focused, and that should help with organization.

I agree with Camacho's summary of the main points, except for a quibble on #7. My understanding is not that Phillips is concerned about the devaluation of the dollar as it is pegged to oil, rather the opposite. Phillips is concerned about the devaluation of the dollar as it comes unpegged from oil, as oil-producing nations maintain amaller reserves in U.S. currency. Or am I misreading?



Wed Jan 21, 2009 9:50 pm
Profile
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ] • Topic evaluate: Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.Evaluations: 0, 0.00 on the average.  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:


BookTalk.org Links 
Forum Rules & Tips
Frequently Asked Questions
BBCode Explained
Info for Authors & Publishers
Featured Book Suggestions
Author Interview Transcripts
Be a Book Discussion Leader!
    

Love to talk about books but don't have time for our book discussion forums? For casual book talk join us on Facebook.

Featured Books






BookTalk.org is a free book discussion group or online reading group or book club. We read and talk about both fiction and non-fiction books as a group. We host live author chats where booktalk members can interact with and interview authors. We give away free books to our members in book giveaway contests. Our booktalks are open to everybody who enjoys talking about books. Our book forums include book reviews, author interviews and book resources for readers and book lovers. Discussing books is our passion. We're a literature forum, or reading forum. Register a free book club account today! Suggest nonfiction and fiction books. Authors and publishers are welcome to advertise their books or ask for an author chat or author interview.


Navigation 
MAIN NAVIGATION

HOMEFORUMSBOOKSTRANSCRIPTSOLD FORUMSADVERTISELINKSFAQDONATETERMS OF USEPRIVACY POLICY

BOOK FORUMS FOR ALL BOOKS WE HAVE DISCUSSED
Sense and Goodness Without God - by Richard CarrierFrankenstein - by Mary ShelleyThe Big Questions - by Simon BlackburnScience Was Born of Christianity - by Stacy TrasancosThe Happiness Hypothesis - by Jonathan HaidtA Game of Thrones - by George R. R. MartinTempesta's Dream - by Vincent LoCocoWhy Nations Fail - by Daron Acemoglu and James RobinsonThe Drowning Girl - Caitlin R. KiernanThe Consolations of the Forest - by Sylvain TessonThe Complete Heretic's Guide to Western Religion: The Mormons - by David FitzgeraldA Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man - by James JoyceThe Divine Comedy - by Dante AlighieriThe Magic of Reality - by Richard DawkinsDubliners - by James JoyceMy Name Is Red - by Orhan PamukThe World Until Yesterday - by Jared DiamondThe Man Who Was Thursday - by by G. K. ChestertonThe Better Angels of Our Nature by Steven PinkerLord Jim by Joseph ConradThe Hobbit by J. R. R. TolkienThe Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas AdamsAtlas Shrugged by Ayn RandThinking, Fast and Slow - by Daniel KahnemanThe Righteous Mind - by Jonathan HaidtWorld War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War by Max BrooksMoby Dick: or, the Whale by Herman MelvilleA Visit from the Goon Squad by Jennifer EganLost Memory of Skin: A Novel by Russell BanksThe Structure of Scientific Revolutions by Thomas S. KuhnHobbes: Leviathan by Thomas HobbesThe House of the Spirits - by Isabel AllendeArguably: Essays by Christopher HitchensThe Falls: A Novel (P.S.) by Joyce Carol OatesChrist in Egypt by D.M. MurdockThe Glass Bead Game: A Novel by Hermann HesseA Devil's Chaplain by Richard DawkinsThe Hero with a Thousand Faces by Joseph CampbellThe Brothers Karamazov by Fyodor DostoyevskyThe Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark TwainThe Moral Landscape by Sam HarrisThe Decameron by Giovanni BoccaccioThe Road by Cormac McCarthyThe Grand Design by Stephen HawkingThe Evolution of God by Robert WrightThe Tin Drum by Gunter GrassGood Omens by Neil GaimanPredictably Irrational by Dan ArielyThe Wind-Up Bird Chronicle: A Novel by Haruki MurakamiALONE: Orphaned on the Ocean by Richard Logan & Tere Duperrault FassbenderDon Quixote by Miguel De CervantesMusicophilia by Oliver SacksDiary of a Madman and Other Stories by Nikolai GogolThe Passion of the Western Mind by Richard TarnasThe Left Hand of Darkness by Ursula K. Le GuinThe Genius of the Beast by Howard BloomAlice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll Empire of Illusion by Chris HedgesThe Sound and the Fury by William Faulkner The Extended Phenotype by Richard DawkinsSmoke and Mirrors by Neil GaimanThe Selfish Gene by Richard DawkinsWhen Good Thinking Goes Bad by Todd C. RinioloHouse of Leaves by Mark Z. DanielewskiAmerican Gods: A Novel by Neil GaimanPrimates and Philosophers by Frans de WaalThe Enormous Room by E.E. CummingsThe Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar WildeGod Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything by Christopher HitchensThe Name of the Rose by Umberto Eco Dreams From My Father by Barack Obama Paradise Lost by John Milton Bad Money by Kevin PhillipsThe Secret Garden by Frances Hodgson BurnettGodless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists by Dan BarkerThe Things They Carried by Tim O'BrienThe Limits of Power by Andrew BacevichLolita by Vladimir NabokovOrlando by Virginia Woolf On Being Certain by Robert A. Burton50 reasons people give for believing in a god by Guy P. HarrisonWalden: Or, Life in the Woods by Henry David ThoreauExile and the Kingdom by Albert CamusOur Inner Ape by Frans de WaalYour Inner Fish by Neil ShubinNo Country for Old Men by Cormac McCarthyThe Age of American Unreason by Susan JacobyTen Theories of Human Nature by Leslie Stevenson & David HabermanHeart of Darkness by Joseph ConradThe Stuff of Thought by Stephen PinkerA Thousand Splendid Suns by Khaled HosseiniThe Lucifer Effect by Philip ZimbardoResponsibility and Judgment by Hannah ArendtInterventions by Noam ChomskyGodless in America by George A. RickerReligious Expression and the American Constitution by Franklyn S. HaimanDeep Economy by Phil McKibbenThe God Delusion by Richard DawkinsThe Third Chimpanzee by Jared DiamondThe Woman in the Dunes by Abe KoboEvolution vs. Creationism by Eugenie C. ScottThe Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael PollanI, Claudius by Robert GravesBreaking The Spell by Daniel C. DennettA Peace to End All Peace by David FromkinThe Time Traveler's Wife by Audrey NiffeneggerThe End of Faith by Sam HarrisEnder's Game by Orson Scott CardThe Curious Incident of the Dog in the Night-Time by Mark HaddonValue and Virtue in a Godless Universe by Erik J. WielenbergThe March by E. L DoctorowThe Ethical Brain by Michael GazzanigaFreethinkers: A History of American Secularism by Susan JacobyCollapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed by Jared DiamondThe Battle for God by Karen ArmstrongThe Future of Life by Edward O. WilsonWhat is Good? by A. C. GraylingCivilization and Its Enemies by Lee HarrisPale Blue Dot by Carl SaganHow We Believe: Science, Skepticism, and the Search for God by Michael ShermerLooking for Spinoza by Antonio DamasioLies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them by Al FrankenThe Red Queen by Matt RidleyThe Blank Slate by Stephen PinkerUnweaving the Rainbow by Richard DawkinsAtheism: A Reader edited by S.T. JoshiGlobal Brain by Howard BloomThe Lucifer Principle by Howard BloomGuns, Germs and Steel by Jared DiamondThe Demon-Haunted World by Carl SaganBury My Heart at Wounded Knee by Dee BrownFuture Shock by Alvin Toffler

OTHER PAGES WORTH EXPLORING
Banned Book ListOur Amazon.com SalesMassimo Pigliucci Rationally SpeakingOnline Reading GroupTop 10 Atheism BooksFACTS Book Selections

cron
Copyright © BookTalk.org 2002-2014. All rights reserved.
Website developed by MidnightCoder.ca
Display Pagerank