Union of Concerned Scientists: Silenced

Dissident Heart

Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) http://www.ucsusa.org/

August 22, 2008

WASHINGTON (August 21, 2008) - Clear Channel Communications removed an anti-nuclear-weapons billboard at Denver International Airport yesterday, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) has learned. The company had already removed a companion advertisement in the Minneapolis airport after Northwest, the official airline of the Republican National Convention, forwarded complaints that the billboard there was "scary" and "anti-McCain."

Only yesterday, Chuck Cannon, director of public affairs at the Denver International Airport confirmed the airport did not have a problem with the ad. As reported in Advertising Age on Wednesday, Cannon said, "While no one has complained yet, my first response would not be to take it down."

Lisbeth Gronlund, a physicist and co-director of UCS's Global Security Program said the ads were meant to highlight an important issue. "The Cold War ended nearly 20 years ago, but the United States and Russia still have many thousands of nuclear weapons, and each keeps more than a thousand on hair-trigger alert, ready to launch within a matter of minutes," said Gronlund. "It is scary. We need a public debate about U.S. nuclear weapons policy, and that's why we developed these ads."

The UCS ads were directed at both presidential candidates, and urged each of them to make addressing the threat of nuclear weapons a high priority. The billboards at the Minneapolis and Denver airports were timed to appear during the Republican and Democratic conventions. The Minneapolis billboard had been on display since August 13. The Denver billboard was posted last Friday.

The Denver version features an image of downtown Denver with target crosshairs superimposed on it. "When only one nuclear bomb could destroy a city like Denver," the headline reads, "we don't need 6,000." The subhead states: "Senator Obama: It's time to get serious about reducing the nuclear threat." The Minneapolis billboard featured an image of that city and addressed the same statement to Sen. John McCain.

The billboards are a part of a larger UCS media campaign that includes smaller versions in bars and restaurants around the convention sites. The group also bought Web ads on Minnesota and Colorado political blog sites.

Interbane · Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:24 pm Post subject:

My job in the Air Force before I left was as an electromechanical team chief to repair those nuclear missiles. They give us a very thorough lesson on the ethics of the situation. The military mindset with regards to those missiles is that they are a "fake camera". There is no intention to use them, they are deterrence. But the public can't know that.

Dissident Heart · Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 2:35 pm Post subject:

Interbane: They give us a very thorough lesson on the ethics of the situation.

What did they identify as the situation , and what was the lesson in ethics?

interbane: The military mindset with regards to those missiles is that they are a "fake camera". There is no intention to use them, they are deterrence. But the public can't know that.

I suspect there are multiple dimensions to the military mindset, with more than a few inconsistencies and outright disagreements within it. But, since it is a political decision to use our military might (something decided by elected officials) I see little reason to think the intention to use these monstrosities doesn't exist...on the contrary, I suspect there are some who are aching for the chance and opportunity to see just how well all of this whiz-bang top-notch best-of-the-bunch technological genius can deliver...and some who simply want to see our enemies totally eviscerated...and, since we did drop two atomic bombs on largely defenseless populations, I see even less reason to think this wont happen again.

Interbane · Posted: Tue Oct 07, 2008 3:45 pm Post subject:

"I see little reason to think the intention to use these monstrosities doesn't exist..."

You'd be right. Of course there are people who'd love to see them used. My worry is that we'll vote into office a fanatically religious zealot who wants to destroy a Muslim country. Razz

What would you propose we do with them. How would you propose we eliminate them? Which, if you didn't know, we are in the process of eliminating them. I'd like to hear your plan, however.


	FORUMS	ABOUT	BOOKS	VIDEOS	ADVERTISE	LINKS	BLOGS	DONATE	CHAT	CONTACT